Report One of Four
"The Resurrection of Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu"
By David Kirkwood
www.shepherdserve.org
david@shepherdserve.org
Soon after
it occurred in December of 2001, I heard the report of Nigerian
pastor Daniel Ekechukwus resurrection via e-mail from my friend,
pastor David K. Aboderin, of Lagos, Nigeria. I also heard
about this miracle from my friend Brent Regis, son-in-law of Reinhard
Bonnke. Bonnke had been preaching at the church where Ekechukwu
was resurrected a short time before it occurred. Brent told
me at that time some of the details of pastor Ekechukwus experience
in hell. Some months after that, I also watched the video
documentary of that miracle produced by Christ for all Nations,
which focused primarily on the miracle of the resurrection. I wanted to learn more about the incident. Since I was scheduled
to spend the first two weeks of September, 2002 teaching at three
pastors conferences in Nigeria, I told David Aboderin that
if it would be possible, I would like to meet pastor Ekechukwu,
and I prayed that the Lord would make it possible.
"Follow-up on the Daniel Ekuchukwu Report"
I learned that pastor Ekechukwu was from a village called Amaimo,
Imo State, and that he was pastoring a church in the city of Onitsha,
Anambra State, called Power Chapel Evangelical Church. Onitsha was about a three-hour drive from where our final conference
would be held, in the eastern Nigerian city of Umahia. So
I asked the pastors at that conference if any of them knew how we
could find pastor Ekechukwu. One young man raised his hand
and told me that he had a friend who had a friend who personally
knew pastor Ekechukwu. However, we also learned that pastor
Ekechukwu was very difficult to meet, as he is in great demand. To make a long story short, we eventually learned that pastor Ekechukwu
was temporarily staying at a hotel just five minutes from David
Aboderins home in Lagos, where I would be lodging during my
final three days in Nigeria. We were also given the opportunity
to meet him. So in a country of 130 million people, and in
a city of 12 million, the man I wanted to meet was lodging just
five minutes away from me! It was either great coincidence
or wonderful providence. I was given the favor of personally
meeting with Daniel Ekechukwu twice during those three days and
also talking with several people on his ministry staff who were
very familiar with his story.
The following report has been compiled from several sources: (1)
from pastor Daniel Ekechukwu himself by means of personal discussions
I had with him from September 12-14, 2002, while I was in Lagos,
Nigeria, (2) from his personal written testimony contained in his
own self-published booklet which he gave me, titled Miracle of
the 21st Century, (3) from listening to his public testimony
on September 13th at The Chapel of Glory, Lagos, Nigeria,
(4) from the documentary video produced and sold by the ministry
of Christ for all Nations, which includes the testimonies
of pastor Daniel, the doctor who pronounced him dead, Daniels
wife, Daniels father, the mortician who embalmed Daniel, and
several pastors who were present at his resurrection, and (5) from
a personal discussion with Ede Samuel, a long-time friend and personal
assistant to pastor Daniel, who also was an eye-witness of many
of the events surrounding Daniels death and resurrection. The events described in the following report are factual to the
best of my knowledge and memory. Ive sent this report
to a Nigerian man named Uche Chikezie, who was Daniel Ekechukwus
Public Relations Director, and he affirmed that all that I reported
is true. I am persuaded that due to complications from an
automobile accident, Nigerian pastor Daniel Ekechukwu physically
died in the late evening of Friday, November 30th, 2001, was dead
for at least 42 hours, visited heaven and hell during the time of
his physical death, and was raised from the dead between 3:50 P.M.
and 5:15 P.M. on Sunday, December 2nd, 2001 in the basement of the
Grace of God Mission, located in Onitsha, Nigeria. Pastor Ekechukwus resurrection is the greatest modern miracle
of which Ive heard.
Although some of what happened to pastor Ekechukwu is certainly
extra-biblical, none of it is unbiblical. Indeed, neither
the story of Daniel Ekechukwus resurrection or the story of
your salvation is found in the Bible, making them both extra-biblical,
but neither should be discounted on that basis.
The Account
On Thursday, November 29th, 2001, Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu and his
wife, Nneka, had a misunderstanding that degenerated into an argument
that ended in her slapping him. He was very offended by this
incident, to the point of not even acknowledging her attempt to
reconcile the next morning. Pastor Daniel admitted that throughout
the day of November 30th, he angrily thought about how he would
put his wife in her place when he returned home. He would
not, however, make it home that Friday.
As he was driving home that evening, the brakes on his 20-year old
Mercedes 230E failed as he was heading down a steep hill, and his
car crashed into a concrete pillar that was built to prevent cars
from going over a steep embankment. He was not wearing a seat
belt (few Nigerians did in 2001, but that changed in 2003, when
wearing a seat-belt become a national law), and his chest hit very
forcibly against the steering wheel and its knob, apparently doing
damage to his internal organs, as he was soon vomiting up blood
and having difficulty breathing (not to mention that he soon lost
all signs of life). Daniel was not able to remove himself
from his car, but frantic on-lookers pulled him out. One bystander
volunteered her car while another bystander offered to drive him
to St. Charles Borromeo Hospital, not far away on the outskirts
of Onitsha.
Within minutes of their arrival at the hospital, a doctor began
administering emergency treatment, but Daniel knew his body was
not responding to it. He began praying the prayer of a man
who knows he is going to die, asking God to forgive him of all his
sins so that he would be ready to stand before the Lord. He
also sent for his wife, Nneka, with whom he had refused to speak
when he left his home earlier that day. She fainted upon hearing
the news of her husbands accident and condition, but when
revived was taken by a Christian neighbor to the hospital. Daniels friend, Ede Samuel (whom I interviewed at length)
was with her and essentially witnessed everything that transpired
over the next three days.
Upon seeing Daniel in critical condition when she arrived at St.
Charles Borromeo hospital, Daniels wife burst into tears,
begging her husband not to die and leave her. The doctor admitted
that there was nothing he could do to save Daniels life (keep
in mind this was a Third World hospital), and so Daniel requested
that he be transferred by ambulance to Umezuruike Hospital at Owerri,
where his personal doctor practiced. The Umezuruike hospital
was 80 km away. Daniels wife arranged for the ambulance
against the advice of doctors at St. Charles hospital. It
was on the way to Umezuruike Hospital that Daniel died.
Daniel was lying in the back of the ambulance while his wife was
in the front passenger seat. He began to feel that he was
not going to survive, and so he called for his wife to come to him. He began to say goodbye, give her instructions about certain church
and personal documents, and admonished her to take care of their
sons and his church. She began sobbing greatly and amidst
her tears strongly rebuked him for such negative statements. He was a man of God and should have faith, and not be speaking of
dying!
As she was speaking, Daniel saw two large angels (they were so large
that he later wondered how they fit inside the ambulance---one was
as big as the ambulance) who were completely white (even the pupils
of their eyes). Daniel tried to speak to the angels, but one
held his finger to his lips, motioning for his silence. The
angels lifted him on either side, and Daniel realized that there
were now two of himself. The angels were holding him under
each arm of his spirit man (which was perfectly whole), while his
broken body was lying below. Once they left the ambulance,
Daniel became oblivious to the natural world.
When the ambulance arrived at Umezuruike Hospital with Daniels
body, it was now late at night (Friday, November 30th), and Daniels
doctor was not there. A member of the medical staff, however,
examined his body and sadly told Nneka that her husband was dead
and there was nothing that could be done. Nneka refused to
believe the bad report.
So they drove to the Federal Medical Center in Owerri, but found
no doctor there either. Finally they drove to the Eunice Clinic,
and there Daniel was confirmed to be dead by Doctor Jossy Anuebunwa. There was no breathing, no heartbeat or pulse, and Daniels
pupils were dilated and fixed. The doctor said that there
was nothing he could do. A death certificate was issued at
11:30 P.M., November 30, 2001.
They then drove Daniels corpse to his fathers house
in a nearby village, and naturally Daniels father and other
family members were heartbroken at the sight of Daniels dead
body, weeping profusely. Daniels father instructed them
to take his body to Ikeduru General Hospital Mortuary (now known
as Inyishi Community Hospital mortuary) not far away. They arrived there around 1:00 A.M. on Saturday morning. The
resident mortician, Mr. Darlington Manu, received the corpse and
the family members departed.
The primitive Nigerian mortuary where Daniels body was taken
had no cold storage facilities, and so the mortician injected embalming
chemicals into Daniels fingers and into his feet. He
then prepared to fully embalm Daniels body by cutting Daniels
inner thigh in order to insert a tube by which he could inject more
embalming fluid. As he did this, he experienced a shock that pushed
him away from the corpse. This did not surprise him, as he
had experienced similar forces before and attributed them to occult
powers. (Such things are widely practiced in Africa and highly
respected by all African pastors whom I know. Africans never understand
the skepticism of Americans regarding the reality of occult power.) After a second attempt and a second shock that somewhat paralyzed
his right arm, he concluded that Daniel must have been a member
of a powerful secret society. He assumed, however, that after
some occult sacrifices and incantations the powers in the corpse
would subside, and he could then complete his work. (This
mortician, of course, was not a Christian, but converted after Daniels
resurrection.) So he instructed an assistant to lay Daniels
body in the rear of the mortuary where many other corpses were already
laid. (Incidentally, Daniel said that people could smell the
embalming chemicals coming out of his body for two weeks after his
resurrection. They would hug him and hold their noses.)
Around 2:00 A.M. Saturday morning, the mortician, who lived very
close to the mortuary, was disturbed by songs of worship coming
from inside his mortuary, which stopped as soon as approached the
mortuary doorway. This occurred twice. Upon searching
for the musics source in his mortuary, he noticed some kind
of light emanating from the face of Daniels corpse. This completely unnerved him.
The mortician was so disturbed over what was happing that that he
located Daniels father on Saturday morning to inform him of
what had been happening and to request that he remove Daniels
corpse from his mortuary. Then, on Saturday night, while she
was sleeping, Daniels wife experienced a dream in which she
saw the face of her husband, and he was asking her why they had
left him in the mortuary. He stated that he was not dead and
that she should take him to Onitsha where German evangelist Reinhard
Bonnke was preaching. She determined to do so, even though
her family thought she was out of her mind. Daniel had been
dead for more than 28 hours. The family finally yielded, but
purchased a casket and brought funeral clothing for the mortician
to dress Daniel. Rigor mortis had fully set in by this time. An ambulance was hired on Sunday morning, December 2nd, and the
casket that contained Daniels body was taken to Grace of
God Mission (a large church) in Onitsha, about one and half
hours away, where evangelist Reinhard Bonnke was preaching at an
afternoon church dedication service. They arrived at the church
around 1:00 P.M.
The church grounds were being protected by swarms of federal, state
and local security guards for the sake of Reinhard Bonnke, who has
received many death threats, and who is hated by Muslims all over
Africa. (Not to mention the fact that the World Trade Center had
been destroyed by Muslim hijackers just weeks before.) For
this reason, the security guards would not allow the casket to be
brought onto church grounds, thinking it might actually contain
explosives. Daniels wife loudly pleaded with them, and
opened the casket to show them her dead husband, which resulted
in their mocking and even flogging her because of her persistence
to gain entrance. She caused such a disturbance that the senior
pastor was notified, and his son instructed that Daniels wife
be permitted to bring his body to the church without the casket,
and that it be placed in the basement. Daniels body
was laid there on two tables pushed together in a Sunday School
room.
Some believers gathered around Daniels body and prayed while
Reinhard Bonnke, who knew nothing of the dead body in the basement,
preached and prayed. Eventually, it was noticed that Daniels
corpse twitched, and then irregular breathing started. (By
this time, Reinhard Bonnke had left the premises entirely.) The attendant believers began praying fervently, and because his
body was stiff and cold, they began massaging his neck, arms and
legs. When those in the sanctuary got word that a dead man
below was coming back to life, the basement room was soon jammed
with people. Suddenly Daniel sneezed and arose with a jump. It was somewhere between 3:50 and 5:15 PM on Sunday afternoon. Daniel had died Friday night around 10:00 PM. He slowly became
fully coherent over the next few hours.
Do you doubt this account? A report on the web site of Christ
for all Nations declares:
Here are some hard facts that wont go away. For two days Daniel did not breathe, his heart had stopped beating. It was in a hot climate, not suspended animation in an ice chamber. He had been injected with a harsh chemical to keep back mortification. As a corpse he was carted around for hours, pulled about, and lay
in an airless narrow coffin for hours. He should have had
severe brain damage, but he is alive now without any ill effects.
This is no unsupported claim of bringing someone to life privately,
as in a house. Here was a public event, an open demonstration
of revival from death. If anyone has to be named, it is Nneka. Her incurable faith alone prevented Daniels burial simply
to bring him where she was convinced God could bring him back to
life. She regarded Reinhard Bonnke as a man of God and that
in the atmosphere of faith where he ministered this miracle was
possible. The faith of Nneka dictated the whole event and
her faith was honored. By whom? Who honored her faith? If not God, who else?
I would add to this defense that if the incident was a hoax, I doubt
that pastor Ekechukwu would have invented the story of what happened
to him when he was escorted to hell, which I will relate next. Pastor Daniels message is now one of repentance to the church,
to prepare the church to stand before Jesus, and many have indeed
repented after hearing his testimony. If his story is all a
hoax, the result of this hoax is real holiness. Finally, the
ministry of Reinhard Bonnke certainly needs no promotional hoax, as
his Nigerian crusades are already attended by millions. He in
fact states that he had nothing to do with the miracle, and wasnt
aware of the dead body in the basement of the church where he was
preaching.
As amazing as the story of his death and resurrection is, what Daniel
experienced after his death is even more amazing. To him, what
he experienced between his death and resurrection could have taken
only fifteen minutes, even though he was physically dead for almost
two days. After he was lifted from his body by the two angels
in the ambulance, he soon found himself momentarily alone, but was
soon joined by a different angel. Daniel stated that if he was
confused about something that he saw or experienced, or if he had
a question in his mind, this angel immediately gave him the answer. This angel first told him that they were going to Paradise. There was no time expended in getting anywhere the angel took him. As soon as the angel said they were going to Paradise, they were there.
Daniel stood with the angel and watched a multitude of worshipping
people who were dressed in sparkling white garments. He immediately
thought they were angels, but the escorting angel told him that they
were human beings who, while they lived on earth, served God
and had their faith focused on Christ Jesus and lived righteously. These people were all ageless and raceless. That is, none appeared
to be young or middle-aged or elderly, and none had any racial distinctives
in their appearance. All were focused on a very bright light
above them, and all worshipped in perfect unison. They would
all lift their hands at once and bow at once as if a sort of
electronic device was activating them.
Daniel did notice one man who looked elderly among the multitude,
and the thought occurred to him that perhaps that man was God, but
the escorting angel immediately corrected him. The man was father
Abraham. (Read Luke 16:19-31 for a story Jesus told that speaks
of Abraham in the afterlife.)
Daniel longed to join the worshippers, but the angel told him that
there were other things Daniel needed to see. He told Daniel
they would next go to see Jesus promise to His followers, the
mansion He had prepared for those whom He would find righteous
on the last day. Immediately they were there. Daniel
said there is no earthly way to describe what he saw. The mansion
had no apparent end to its height or width. It continually moved,
and each room also revolved in some manner. It was made of something
that was transparent like glass, and the floors appear to be made
of light. Daniel didnt see anybody in the great mansion,
but heard beautiful singing. Wondering where the music was coming
from, the angel immediately pointed him to the many flowers around
the mansion. When Daniel looked at them more closely, they were
moving and swaying and singing praise to God!
The angel told Daniel, The mansion is ready but the saints of
God are not. Jesus is being delayed because Christians in the
church are not ready yet. (This is entirely scriptural;
see 2 Pet. 3:12.)
Next, the angel took Daniel to hell, and they stood at the gate. When the angel lifted his hand and let it fall again, the gate opened,
and Daniel could immediately hear the awful sounds of people screaming
and weeping, but everything in hell was in total blackness. Then a bright light shone from the angel, and Daniel could see many
groups of people in anguish. He told me of several specific
groups that went through endless cycles of torment, held captive to
the same sins they practiced on earth. One group consisted of
people who would eat their own flesh and then vomit it out onto the
ground, at which time the vomit would fly back onto their bodies and
turn back into flesh that they would eat again. The angel told
Daniel these people were those who had eaten human flesh as an occult
practice. (Such things occur in Africa all the time.) Another group, who had stolen land from others while on earth, endlessly
dug rock-hard ground with their bare hands.
As I heard Daniel relate this scene, I couldnt help but thinking
of how many times Scripture declares that God will repay every person
according to his or her deeds, and also promises that everyone will
reap precisely what they have sown. I remembered the story Jesus
told of Lazarus and the rich man. In the afterlife, their roles
were exactly reversed. The rich man longed for a drip of water
from Lazarus just as Lazarus had previously longed for a crumb from
the rich mans table.
Pastor Daniel also saw the former military dictator of Nigeria. He saw a Christian who had dabbled in occult practices and fallen
away from the Lord, and a pastor who had embezzled money from his
own church and also lied about it. The former pastor pleaded
that he would return the money if Daniel could help him escape hell. Although there were different kinds of tortures, all of the people
in hell writhed in agony under an unseen force that would wrench them
repeatedly. All of them were shouting, wailing and gnashing
their teeth. Pastor Daniel told me that if every Christian could
see what he saw, there would be no need to preach the gospel, as every
Christian would become the gospel.
The most surprising thing is what happened next. The escorting
angel told pastor Daniel, If your record is to be called here,
you will in no doubt be thrown into hell. Pastor Daniel
immediately defended himself saying, I am a man of God! I serve Him with all my heart! But a Bible appeared in
the angels hand, and it was opened to Matthew 5 where Jesus
warned that if one calls his brother a fool he is guilty enough to
go into the hell of fire (see Matt. 5:21-22). Pastor Daniel
knew he was guilty for the angry words he had spoken to his wife. The angel also reminded him that Jesus promised that God will not
forgive our sins if we do not forgive others (see Matt. 6:14-15),
because we will reap what we have sown. Only those who are merciful
will obtain mercy (Matt 5:7). The angel told Daniel that the
prayers he prayed as he was dying in the hospital were of no effect,
because he refused to forgive his wife even when she attempted to
reconcile on the morning of his fatal accident.
Pastor Daniel wept at this revelation, but the angel told him not
to cry, because God was going to send him back to the earth to grant
the rich mans request (see Luke 16:27-30). A man would
come back from the dead and warn people of hell. The angel said
that Daniels resurrection would serve as a sign and be the last
warning for this generation.
Finally, pastor Daniel was led to the top of a mountain, at which
there was a large hole full of darkness. There the escorting
angel handed Daniel to a man standing there whom he did not recognize
at first, but soon realized it was German evangelist Reinhard Bonnke. The angel told Daniel that man would help him spread the gospel of
salvation.
Both Daniel and Rev. Bonnke fell into the hole, and that is when pastor
Daniel jumped up from the table where he lay at the Grace of God mission. He was back in his body after having been dead for at least 42 hours,
almost two full days.
As you may imagine, pastor Daniel greatly emphasizes in his preaching
the need to forgive those who have wronged us, lest anyone suffer
the fate he almost suffered. How important it is that we obey
Jesus commandments regarding forgiveness and walking in love
toward each other, as well as all the rest of His commandments. It is indeed time for the church to repent and pursue peace
with all men, and the holiness without which no one will see the Lord
(Heb. 12:14). Do not listen to false teachers who say that holiness
is not essential to ultimately gain eternal life. Jesus warned
that only those who do the will of His Father will enter the kingdom
of heaven (see Matt. 7:21). Do not listen to teachers who say
that if you are once saved you are guaranteed that you will always
be saved. Jesus warned His closest disciples (see Matt. 24:1-3)
of the possibility of their not being ready when He returned and being
cast into hell (see Matt. 24:42-25:46).
If we expect God to forgive us, we must forgive others. That
is what Jesus solemnly promised. Are you ready to stand before
Jesus, sincere and blameless?
By David Kirkwood
By David Kirkwood
www.shepherdserve.org
david@shepherdserve.org
So many people have asked questions regarding my report on the resurrection
of Nigerian pastor Daniel Ekechukwu that I thought I should write
a follow-up. Reactions have ranged from total unbelief to serious
self-examination and repentance. And because folks have forwarded
the e-mail version or copied the snail-mail version, Ive received
responses from far and wide. The report has, for example, been
posted on a web site in New Zealand and inquired about in Finland.
If youve forwarded my previous report to anyone, you may want
to forward this follow-up as well.
First, do I really believe that pastor Daniel Ekechukwu was dead for
at least 42 hours? Yes, and for two reasons. First, because
the evidence strongly indicates that this miracle actually happened.
It is documented by means of many credible witnesses. It didnt
happen secretly; it happened publicly. I personally interviewed
two of the witnesses, Daniel himself, and a friend of his, Ede Samuel,
who was there when he died and when he was resurrected. Daniels
friend said he thought Daniels wife was crazy thinking that
her husband would come back to life.
Second, I believe the report because my theology makes room for the
existence of God. It amazes me that people who see and experience
millions of unexplainable miracles every day refuse to accept the
fact that God performed one more little miracle in Nigeria.
When you can explain to me how your fingernails grow or how the leaves
change color in Fall, Ill explain to you how Daniel Ekechukwu
was raised from the dead! It takes millions of unexplainable
miracles for you just to read this sentence. To religious unbelievers,
Paul asked, Why is it considered incredible among you people
if God does raise the dead? (Acts 26:8).
If one does not believe that Daniel Ekechukwu was raised from the
dead, one must then believe that he was unconscious for at least 42
hours, and that medical personnel, a doctor, family members, pastors,
church members, and an experienced mortician were fooled into thinking
he was dead because of the fact that he was not breathing, had no
heartbeat or pulse, had fixed pupils and rigor mortis! One might
just as well claim that Lazarus wasnt dead, only unconscious,
and that he just happened to regain consciousness by the startling
sound of Jesus voice as he lay in his tomb. If I had been
there to examine Daniel Ekechukwu, I would have thought he was dead,
just like everyone else.
One discernment ministry attempts to discredit this miracle
by quoting Hebrews 9:27: It is appointed for men to die once
and after this comes judgment. Supposedly this verse proves
that Daniel Ekechukwu could not have been resurrected since the Bible
says that people only die once. This is a very weak argument
indeed. A quick look at the context of Hebrews 9:27 reveals
that the inspired author was not declaring an unalterable rule, but
using a general truth as an analogy for Christs one-time
sacrifice. The passage actually says, For inasmuch
as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes
judgment, so Christ also, having been offered once to bear
the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation...
If Hebrews 9:27 invalidates Daniel Ekechukwus resurrection,
then it also invalidates the experiences of those whom Jesus, Peter
and Paul raised from the dead and who later died again.
Another discernment ministry, splitting hairs, points
out that the rich mans request (recorded in Luke 16:27-28) was denied. This supposedly exposes the lie of pastor Daniels
claim that the angel told him that the request of the rich man had
been granted in Daniels resurrection. May I point out
that the rich man of Luke 16 specifically requested that Lazarus
be resurrected to warn his five brothers, but that request
was denied because Abraham knew they wouldnt believe,
since they, as Jews, ignored the Law and Prophets all their
lives. Abraham, however, never promised that no other people
in the future would rise from the dead as a sign in an attempt
to get other sinners (especially those who never heard any Scripture)
to repent of their sins. If Abraham was promising that God would
never resurrect anyone with the hope of leading people to repentance,
then we must deny the many later resurrections of which we read in
the Gospels and Acts, including even Jesus resurrection.
The angels statement to pastor Daniel Ekechukwu could be paraphrased,
Even though the rich mans request that Lazarus be sent
to his five brothers was denied several thousand years ago (and for
good reason), now God is mercifully going to grant even more than
the rich man requested, and also for good reason. You will be
resurrected and testify before more than five people who will not
repent---you will speak to millions, and many who hear you will
repent. So it is in that sense that God has granted
the rich mans request. And God certainly has the prerogative
to do that if He desires, even though some discernment minister might object.
It has been asked, How was it that Daniels body had no
visible marks from his accident when he came back to life?
I suppose that if God is able to raise someone from the dead, He is
also able to heal someones bruises, cracked ribs, and damaged
internal organs. In fact, if God did not heal the people He
resurrects, they would immediately die again of what originally killed
them.
Would not have Daniels body have bloated in the hot Nigerian
climate during those two days? another person asks. I dont
know what would have been normal, but as I pointed out in my report,
some Nigerians dont bury their dead for many weeks or even months
after death as they gather money from relatives for funerals.
They must load those bodies with embalming fluid. (When David
Aboderin, my Nigerian friend whom I mentioned in my previous report,
lost his mother about a year ago, she was not buried for three months
after her death.) Not only was Daniels body partially
injected with embalming chemicals, but it seems obvious from the morticians
testimony that supernatural things were occurring to Daniels
body even as it lay in the morgue.
Some of the discernment ministries have attempted to discredit
the entire miracle because of its association with Reinhard Bonnke,
whom they deem to be a false teacher. Bonnke, however, is a man who
has come close to death for his faith in Christ, and risks his life
every time he ministers in Africa, where Muslims hate him. He
was not permitted to minister in Nigeria for a number of years because
of Muslim rioting in the city of Kano, where many Christians lost
their lives and he almost lost his life just prior to a crusade there.
He proclaims a gospel that calls millions of people to repentance
and faith in Jesus Christ, and he prays for sick people, and numbers
of them are healed through their faith, a very biblical thing.
The truth is, as I said in my report, Reinhard Bonnke was nowhere
near the church when Daniel Ekechukwu was resurrected.
Many of the discernment ministers, although saying they
believe that God can heal someone or raise someone from the dead,
could not tell you of a single instance where they believe God has
actually healed someone or raised someone from the dead. Moreover,
they do their best to discredit every report of a healing or resurrection
if it is associated with someone whose doctrine differs from theirs.
And while these discernment ministers spread their judgments
to their little constituencies of fellow unbelieving believers, people
like Reinhard Bonnke just keep preaching the gospel to the lost multitudes,
risking what no discernment minister would dare risk,
as they safely tap away on their keyboards in their kitchens and bedrooms.
What about the theological implications of Daniels experience
in hell? For example, isnt the scene of people endlessly
eating their own flesh far-fetched? No, not really. God
has repeatedly promised in His Word that He will render to every person
according to his deeds. Paul wrote:
But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to each person according to his deeds: to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life; but to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation. There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek, but glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek (Rom. 2:5-10; emphasis added).
The people whom Daniel saw endlessly eating their own flesh were apparently
being judged for eating human flesh as an occult practice during their
lives. In the Old Testament, God promised He would judge wicked
people by leaving them no alternative but to eat the flesh of their
own dead children (see Deut. 28:54-57). As foretold in the New
Testament book of Revelation, when God will wrathfully turn the waters
of the earth into blood, an angel will declare, Righteous are
You, who are and who were, O Holy One, because You judged these things; for they poured out the blood of saints and prophets, and You have
given them blood to drink. They deserve it (Rev.
16:5-6). God is not the big teddy bear that so many think He
is.
Unless people repent, God is going to give them exactly what they
deserve. They will reap what they have sown, and thus Hell will
be customized for every sinner. Jesus warned of this: And
that slave who knew his masters will and did not get ready or
act in accord with his will, will receive many lashes, but the one
who did not know it, and committed deeds worthy of a flogging, will
receive but few (Luke 12:47-48).
Certainly the one aspect of Daniels experience in hell that
is the most sobering was the angels declaration that Daniel
would have ended up there because of his unforgiveness (if God had
not had mercy on him). Can unforgiveness actually cause a Christian
to end up in hell? Again, Scripture answers Yes.
Do you remember the parable of the unforgiving servant found in Matthew
18:21-35? When the master learned that his servant whom he had
graciously forgiven had refused to forgive a fellow servant, he was moved with anger, and handed him over to the torturers
until he should repay all that was owed him (Matt. 18:34).
That is, the servants formerly-forgiven and unpayable debt was
reinstated, so that he found himself once again owing what he could
never repay, under the wrath of his master and handed over to be tortured.
Jesus then warned, So shall My heavenly Father do to you, if
each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart (Matt.
18:35).
Clearly, this was a warning to Christians as proven by the
external context (see Matt. 18:1-2, 21; the parable was spoken to
believers, admonishing them to forgive their brothers),
and by the internal context, as the unforgiving servant obviously
represents a person who was previously forgiven by God, a Christian.
But that forgiven persons forgiven status was annulled.
He reaped what he had sown. Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu was no different
than the unforgiving servant in Jesus parable. So why
should we be surprised that an angel told Daniel Ekechukwu what Jesus
has told all of His followers?
All of this is to say that Christians can forfeit their salvation
by unforgiveness. If you are among those who believe that if
you are once saved you are guaranteed that you will always be saved,
you need to re-think your position. That view is not only disproved
by the parable of the unforgiving servant, but also by many other
scriptures. (See Matt. 24:4-5, 11-13, 23-26, 42-51; 25:1-30; Luke
8:11-15; 11:24-28; 12:42-46; John 6:66-71; 8:31-32, 51; 15:1-6; Acts
11:21-23; 14:21-22; Rom. 6:11-23; 8:12-14, 17; 11:20-22; 1 Cor. 9:23-27;
10:1-21; 11:29-32; 15:1-2; 2 Cor. 1:24; 11:2-4; 12:21-13:5; Gal. 5:1-4;
6:7-9; Phil. 2:12-16; 3:17-4:1; Col. 1:21-23; 2:4-8, 18-19; 1 Thes.
3:1-8; 1 Tim. 1:3-7, 18-20; 4:1-16; 5:5-6, 11-15, 6:9-12, 17-19, 20-21;
2 Tim. 2:11-18; 3:13-15; Heb. 2:1-3; 3:6-19; 4:1-16: 5:8-9; 6:4-9,
10-20; 10:19-39; 12:1-17, 25-29; Jas. 1:12-16; 4:4-10; 5:19-20; 2
Pet. 1:5-11; 2:1-22; 3:16-17; 1 John 2:15-2:28; 5:16; 2 John 6-9;
Jude 20-21; Rev. 2:7, 10-11, 17-26; 3:4-5, 8-12, 14-22; 21:7-8; 22:18-19.).
Jesus solemnly warned that if we dont forgive others, God will not forgive us. This is so vital that we should examine
ourselves in this regard at least as much as every time we pray
according to Jesus:
Whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone, so that your Father who is in heaven will also forgive you your transgressions. But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father who is in heaven forgive your transgressions (Mark 11:25-26; emphasis added).
This is so fundamental that the concept is included in the Lords Prayer:
And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors....For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions (Matt. 6:12-15; emphasis added).
Keep in mind that God does not expect us to do what He himself
does not do, that is, forgive people who dont humble themselves
and request our forgiveness. If a brother sins against us, Jesus
didnt say we should forgive him; He said we should confront
him. And if he refuses to listen to us, Jesus didnt
say we should forgive him. Rather, we should bring two
or three with us and confront him again. And if he refuses
to listen to those two or three, he should not be forgiven but
be confronted before the church. And if he refuses to
listen to the church, he should not be forgiven but be excommunicated
and treated like an unbeliever. Thus we can confidently
say that there are some people whom God does not want us to forgive.
Significantly, these steps of reconciliation and discipline I have
just mentioned are found in Matthew 18:15-17, just prior to the parable
of the unforgiving servant. These two passages certainly should
not be interpreted so as to contradict one another.
Forgiveness in its purest form can only be given when it is requested. Jesus said, If your brother sins, rebuke him; and if
he repents, forgive him. And if he sins against you seven
times a day, and returns to you seven times, saying, I repent, forgive him (Luke 17:3-4; emphasis added). In the
parable of the unforgiving servant mentioned earlier, note that both
first and second servants requested mercy.
In pastor Daniels case, his wife had sought for reconciliation,
Daniel had refused her, and then he experienced his ill-timed death.
Thank God that He had mercy on Daniel, and in so doing, God has shown
His mercy to all of us who are not ready to stand before Him because
of unforgiveness in our hearts.
Clearly, it is a very great evil in Gods eyes to refuse to forgive
a brother or sister in Christ who requests our forgiveness.
It is also an evil to not confront a brother or sister who sins against
us and harbor ill-will against him or her. This is, however,
commonly practiced by those of us who name Jesus as Lord. When
offended, we dont confront the offender. Rather, we harbor
a grudge and tell everyone of the offense, gossiping, adding sin to
our sin, and placing ourselves in the danger of being judged by God
(see Matt. 7:1-5). Jesus warned us that if our relationship
with our brother is not right, our relationship with God is not right
either:
Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering (Matt. 5:23-24).
If we realize that we have offended a brother, we should stop what
we are doing, even if we are performing some spiritual obligation,
and go to that brother to work towards reconciliation, just as Jesus
taught.
Thus, both the offender (if he realizes what he has done) and the
offended have responsibility before God to make no delay in working
for reconciliation. And if they cant reach reconciliation,
they should seek the help of others until reconciliation is reached
or until one party is excommunicated from the church, according to
Christs instructions in Matthew 18:15-17. Obviously, this
is serious stuff to God.
With unbelievers and false believers, of course, it is not the same. We can attempt to confront those who offend us, but we have very little
recourse if they refuse to be reconciled.
As our general rule, we should imitate God, who longs for sinners
to turn from their sins and be reconciled to Him, and so He always
is working towards reconciliation, patiently waiting for sinners to
repent. We, too, should maintain an open-heart policy,
always doing what we can to be at peace with others. In this
regard, Paul wrote, If possible, so far as it depends on you,
be at peace with all men (Rom. 12:18). Both Jesus and
Stephen prayed for God to forgive the very people who were killing
them. We, too, have the same capacity to love by the power of
the Holy Spirit.
Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu is now calling Christians to do what Christ
has been commanding all His followers to do for two thousand years:
forgive one another. And he is doing it with the passion of
a man who really believes that Jesus meant what He said. What
if the whole thing is a hoax? Then the worst thing that will
come out of it is that hundreds of thousands, and perhaps millions,
of Christians will examine their lives and obey Jesus commandments
regarding forgiveness. Thus they will be more ready to meet Him when
He comes. That isnt so bad, is it? And even
if we ignore everything that Daniel Ekechukwu says, we would be wise
to not ignore anything Jesus said. He had a lot to say about
the absolute necessity of forgiveness and the dire consequences of
unforgiveness.
By David KirkwoodIf you address as Father the One who impartially judges according to each ones work, conduct yourselves in fear during the time of your stay on earth; knowing that you were not redeemed with perishable things like silver or gold from your futile way of life inherited from your forefathers, but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ (1 Pet. 1:17-19, emphasis added).
Report Three of Four
"Concerning the Resurrection of Daniel Ekechukwu"
By David Kirkwood
www.shepherdserve.org
david@shepherdserve.org
One year after my interview of Daniel Ekechukwu, I returned to Nigeria
again, as I have every September of the past four years. I hoped
that I would once again be able to locate and interview Daniel, as
I would be teaching at a pastors conference about three hours
away from the city where he lived. (I should say, Where
I thought he lived, because I later learned that Daniel had
move to Lagos, a six to seven-hour drive from where I would be in
Port Harcourt.) I also hoped to interview his wife, as well
as the doctor who pronounced him dead and the mortician who partially
embalmed him, in order to find out first hand if the facts of Daniels
miracle that I had previously reported were accurate. I had
received some e-mail correspondence from some hostile and not-so-hostile
discernment ministries (as they call themselves), who
all attempted to discredit my reporting, saying I had not done a thorough
investigation. Report Four of Four
"Answering Skeptics"
This article is a response to skeptical statements and a comparison
chart concerning the resurrection of Daniel Ekechukwu that have been
publicly posted at "Deception
in the Church." Because
the creator of that website has taken the liberty to freely quote
from my articles on Daniel Ekechukwu, I knew he wouldnt mind
if I freely quoted from his articles. This is a comparison chart noting the divergent
details in five major sources of information regarding the alleged
dead raising of Daniel Ekechukwu in Nigeria in a church where Reinhard
Bonnke was visiting (emphasis added). Leo Igwe is the director of the Center for InquiryNigeria,
and the secretary of the Nigerian Humanist Movement. He is a strong
skeptic and a long-time critic of German evangelist Reinhard Bonnke,
a favorite among Nigerian Christians. The sale of the $35 video alone will bring in huge profits
to the coffers of CFAN (multiply the number of videos likely to
be sold--you do the math!). It will also make Daniel Ekechukwu a
rich man and his church will have plenty of money to preach the
Word-Faith gospel. It is true. I would say it this way. We have to say 'yes'
to Jesus. Many have done that, but when saying 'yes' to Jesus, we
must say at the same time 'no' to sin. Otherwise, that 'yes' to
Jesus is invalid. We cannot walk in two directions at the same time.
If we do, we fool ourselves. That would be very terrible, like that
pastor that was witnessed there. Say 'yes' to Jesus from the bottom
of your heart and turn around from unrighteousness. Repent of your
sins and receive forgiveness by the blood of Jesus Christ. Then
walk the path of righteousness. Whosoever calls upon the name of
the Lord shall be saved. Bonnke hardly
sounds like a false teacher, does he? He, in fact, has also
been greatly impacted by what happened to Daniel Ekechukwu.
My first stop was in the city of Owerri, Imo State, in Eastern Nigeria.
There I located the Umezurike hospital, the Federal Medical Center,
and St. Eunices Clinic, the three final medical facilities where
Daniels wife took his body on the night of November 30, 2001
(all of which I mentioned in my first article). They were all
in the same general vicinity of Owerri. When I arrived at St.
Eunices Clinic, Dr. Jossy Anuebunwa, who had pronounced Daniel
dead, was temporarily out, but I videotaped an interview of his personal
assistant, Peter Chinedu Anele. Peter told me that he had known
Dr. Anuebunwa for over twenty-two years, that Dr. Anuebunwa had received
his medical degree from the University of Nigeria, and that he had
been practicing medicine and gynecology for about twenty years.
St. Eunices Clinic was indeed a real medical clinic, with a
real nurse and real patients waiting to see Dr. Anuebunwa.

From there, I drove to the village of Ikeduru, to try to find the
Ikeduru General Hospital Mortuary, which I discovered is now known
as Inyishi Community Hospital Mortuary. There I interviewed
on video Mr. Darlington Manu, the mortician who had partially embalmed
Daniel in the very early morning hours of Saturday, December 1, 2001.
He is the chief mortician in Imo State, and always has between twenty
and fifty bodies in his mortuary that are awaiting burial. His
father was a mortician before him, and he has embalmed thousands of
corpses. He showed me many photos of corpses in various stages
of the embalming process.
Mr.
Manu showed me his ledger where he enters important information concerning
every corpse that is brought to his mortuary. It contained hundreds
of entries. He showed me Daniel Ekechukwus name listed
there, and the date his corpse was received was recorded as November
30, 2001. The date recorded that the corpse was taken by the relatives was December
2, 2001. Mr. Manu related to me the story of the arrival of
Daniels family with his body, and how he injected embalming
fluid into Daniels fingers in order to keep them straight.
He also related how he had twice attempted to cut Daniels inner
thigh to inject embalming fluid, and the shock he twice received.
The second time his arm became partially paralyzed, and remained so
through the night. He told me about the worship music
that emanated from his mortuary during the first night Daniels
body was lying there, and the light, something like little stars
that floated above Daniels head when he searched for the source
of the music in themortuary. He told me how he located Daniels
father the next morning, and urgently requested that he remove Daniels
body from his mortuary because of the strange occurrences. He
told me how Daniels father came early Sunday morning, December
2, with Daniels wife to take the body to Onitsha. He said
that he had dressed Daniels body in a white suit, stuffed his
nose with cotton, and laid his body in a coffin that the family had
purchased.
Then he told me something I hadnt known. Mr. Manu had
gone in the ambulance with Daniels wife, son and father to the
church in Onitsha. He was in the room when Daniel came back
to life, an eyewitness! Mr. Manu was not a Christian, and Daniels
resurrection so unnerved him that he immediately left the room and
the premises! He told me that he soon after repented and is
now serving the Lord. His wife, a long-time believer, had been
praying for him for years.
Incidentally, something I learned during practically all of my interviews
is that Nigerians, particularly rural Nigerians, are not nearly so
conscious of the time of day as most Westerners. Most dont
have wristwatches or clocks. So when you ask them what time
something happened, they can only tell you if it was early or late
morning, afternoon or evening. If they wake up in the middle
of the night, the next day they cant tell you what time it happened,
because they dont know. Mr. Manu was a perfect example
of this. So when discernment ministries attempt
to discredit the story by showing slight time discrepancies, it only
exposes what they dont know about rural Africans.
Mr. Manu also gave me a tour of his mortuary. I saw about twenty-five
corpses in the rear portion of his building, and he showed me exactly
where Daniels body had laid. Some of the corpses he showed
me had been in his mortuary for many months, yet the smell you might
expect was very faint, and none of the bodies were bloated, all having
been emblamed. (As I said in a previous report, Nigerians dont
bury their dead for weeks and sometimes months as they collect money
from relatives and prepare for elaborate funerals.) Mr. Manu
showed me one unclaimed corpse that had been lying in
his mortuary for five years! There were no cold storage facilities.
That evening, I stayed overnight in the Best Way Hotel in Owerri.
The next morning, I journeyed back to the St. Eunices Clinic
in Owerri. On my way there, I called Daniel Ekechukwu by cell
phone. I knew he might be preaching outside the country or anywhere
in Nigeria, but I hoped he would be at his home in Onitsha, about
an hour away. If he was in Onitsha, I was intending to tell
him that I would be coming there that afternoon, and to ask if I could
meet him at his home.
When I reached him by phone, he asked me if I was in the U.S.
I told him I was in Nigeria. He asked me if I was in Lagos.
I told him that I was in Owerri. He told me that he was in Owerri, and had been staying in the Best Way Hotel---where
I had just left minutes before! I could hardly believe it.
I had come to Nigeria not knowing if Daniel would even be in the country,
and thinking he was still living in Onitsha, when in reality, he had
moved to Lagos (a seven-hour drive away). However, he just happened to be in the Owerri area for his sisters wedding that weekend.
Because his fathers house was so crowded, he and his wife had
decided to get away for one night and drove forty minutes to stay
in one of many possible hotels in Owerri, a city of a two hundred
thousand people. The hotel he had chosen was the same
hotel I had randomly chosen, and we were both there the same night. It was another amazing coincidence or wonderful providence.
In any case, Daniel and his wife agreed to meet me at the St. Eunice
Clinic, where I was going to interview Dr. Anuebunwa. Once we
all arrived, Daniel invited me to join him later at his fathers
house in the village of Amaimo, about a forty-minute drive away, once
I had interviewed the doctor who wrote his death certificate.
I
videotaped Dr. Anuebunwa as I interviewed him. He is a Christian
man who gave me the same answers that his personal assistant had the
day before to my questions about his background. He stated that
during his seventeen years of practicing medicine, he had pronounced
hundreds of people dead. I asked him what were the chances that
Daniel was only unconscious the night he pronounced him dead.
He said that there was no chance. Daniel had no heartbeat, no
respiration, no pulse, and his pupils were fixed and dilated.
From
there I drove to Daniels fathers house, taking a dirt
road to the village of Amaimo, and actually arrived before Daniel
and his wife, Nneka. So I spent time interviewing Daniels
father on video. His story collaborated perfectly with the details
I had heard from everyone else. He told me how he fell to the
ground in anguish when his sons body was brought to his home,
crying out to God and asking, Why have You punished me like
this? He told me about the morticians desperate
request on Saturday morning for him to remove Daniels body from
his mortuary. He told me about Nnekas dream, and Daniels
resurrection. He was in the room when Daniel came back to life.
I asked him if he believed that Daniel would come back to life.
He admitted that he only took Daniels body to The Grace of
God Mission in Onitsha to please Daniels wife, because he
feared she would hold it against him for the rest of his life if he
didnt. (I later learned that according to their social
customs, Nneka would have had to remain a widow for the rest of her
life, living at her father-in-laws home. Her only option
to remarry would have been if one of Daniels brothers had proposed
to her.)
When Daniel and Nneka arrived, Daniel told me what had been happening
to him during the year since I had last seen him. He had traveled
to Austria, Finland, Estonia and the U.S. to preach. He had
been giving his testimony all over Nigeria at Reinhard Bonnkes
crusades. He had relocated to Lagos to be closer to an international
airport and a domestic airport that serves all of Nigeria. Someone
had given him a large sum of money to purchase a nice house in Lagos,
but he had used the money to purchase a generator, a sound system,
platform, and a truck to facilitate his own evangelistic crusades
in every state of Nigeria. He said that earthly things now mean
nothing to him.
I
videotaped a twenty-minute interview with Daniels wife, Nneka,
the true heroine of the story. Her details harmonized perfectly
with what everyone else had told me. She never lost faith in
her heart the entire two days of her husbands death, although
she faced incredible emotional challenges. She was in the room
when he came back to life. I asked her if it was possible that
God have her a gift of special faith (see 1 Cor. 12:9), because her
faith seemed so extraordinary. She said yes. However,
I must say that it seemed to me that she had stretched her own faith
about as far as she could right from the time she learned of her husbands
accident. She told me her faith had been strengthened during
a number of previous trials.
I asked her if her two boys knew that their father had died.
She said that the oldest one, a five-year old, did, and was always
weeping bitterly over the loss of his father. He rode with his
mother in the ambulance that took his fathers body to The
Grace of God Mission, knowing that his fathers body was
in the casket. Nneka said, however, that she deceived
her younger son into thinking that his father was in Onitsha. When Daniel came back to life, his oldest son met him with laughter
in the sanctuary of The Grace of God Mission.
I asked her if the Federal and State security police had literally
flogged her when she insisted that they permit her husbands
body to be taken into the church. She said yes, they beat her
unmercifully with wooden canes. She said that in Nigeria, they
have an expression that applied to what they did to her: They
beat the hell out of me! (I had never heard such an expression
in my life.) I asked her how much time transpired between
her arrival at the church and her husbands resurrection.
She estimated that it was about four hours. I have never met
anyone in my life with such persistent faith.
Finally,
I videotaped an interview of Daniel himself for almost one hour on
his experiences in heaven and hell. He is a passionate communicator.
There is no doubt that he believes his experience was from God.
He elaborated in much more detail than he had with me the previous
year. As I listened to him, I had the continual sense that Daniel
found it very difficult to describe to his own satisfaction what he
heard and saw because the spiritual realm is so different than the
material realm, and there is nothing to use as a comparison to provide
an explanation. (I get that same sense when I read any of the prophets
or Johns Revelation.) I also had the sense that he himself
could not understand everything he experienced while he was out of
his body, and he was still contemplating them and trying to figure
them out. He would tell me his speculations about certain things
he did not understand. For example, Daniel said that the angel
who escorted him always used the word we, speaking of
himself and at least one other person whom Daniel didnt see.
Daniel thinks that perhaps there were other angels around him of which
he was not aware. I suggested that perhaps that angel was speaking
on behalf of God, as we read in Scripture that angels often do, and
God was using the word we just as He used the word us
in the first chapters of Genesis. Daniel wasnt sure.
Daniel again told me that his whole experience out of his body seemed
like only fifteen minutes to him, and that when he was resurrected,
he thought his experience had just been a powerful dream. However,
his wife eventually convinced him that he had been lying in a mortuary
the previous two nights between two other corpses. If Daniels
experience was just a dream, it was a dream of amazing detail and
revelation.
I
also learned that Nneka had begged Daniel to forgive her for
slapping him prior to his departure from their home on the morning
of November 30, 2001. But he had refused. He said such
a thing (a wife slapping a husband) is never done in his country.
It is an abomination. His intention was to wait
until after church on Sunday to ban her for one years separation
from him to his fathers compound in the village of Amaimo. (Womens
liberation has not reached rural Nigeria yet.) After his resurrection,
however, Daniel told his wife that his forgiveness is like bread in
the refrigerator---if she wants it, she can come and get it anytime
she wants!
Daniel also gave me some information about the difference between
Paradise and Heaven, and hell and the lake of fire. For example,
he said that many people think that hell and the lake of the fire
are the same, but they are not. Hell is just a temporary holding
place, and eventually everyone in hell will be judged at the Great
White Throne of Judgment, and then will be cast into the lake of fire.
I already knew that, as it is contained in Scripture. We read
in Revelation 20:14 that death and hell (or as the NASB more accurately
says Hades) will be cast into the lake of fire.
Daniel said that prior to Jesus death and resurrection, the
saints who died went to a place in Hell. (I would prefer to
say Hades, as more accurately translated by the NASB.
Hades is the Greek word that is equivalent to the Old Testament Hebrew
word Sheol; compare Acts 2:27 with Psalm 16:10.
Sheol/Hades was the Old Testament abode of the wicked and righteous
after death, apparently consisting of a place of torment and a place
of comfort; see Luke 16:19-31.) Daniel said that after His death,
Jesus took the righteous with Him to Paradise. I have heard
the same doctrine taught many times in America by conservative Evangelicals.
I asked Daniel about the sign he saw over the gate of hell that he
saw which said, Welcome to the Gate of Hell. I told
him I had a hard time believing that God would put such a sign there,
as it would seem to be a sarcastic, out-of-character, mockery.
Daniel told me something that I had never considered, and still would
like to consider in light of Scripture. He said that Satan still
has authority over the unrighteous in hell, just as he did on earth,
and that hell is actually Satans domain. There the devil
tortures and torments his own, keeping them captive to the very sins
they were enslaved to while they served him on earth. Having
nothing to lose, Satan no longer deceives them about his true nature,
and so he fully reveals it to them, hating his own spiritual children
who have served him. God doesnt deal with the unrighteous
until they are brought before the Great White Throne of judgment,
after which they are cast into the lake of fire. That lake is
a manifestation of Gods judgment against them, and that
is why both hell and Satan himself are ultimately cast there.
One could wonder: If hell is Gods domain of punishment, why
would He not cast people into hell after their judgment at
His Great White Throne, rather than into the lake of fire? Why
wouldnt He cast Satan there as well, rather than into the lake
of fire as we are told He will do? And why would God cast hell itself into the lake of fire if it is something of His design?
Finally, why did Jesus promise that "the Gates of Hades"
(or "hell" as the KJV says) would not overpower His church
(see Matt. 16:18) if "the Gates of Hades" speak of or represent
a place of God's domain? Those are a few questions to think about.
Daniel
also indicated that Paradise and the place of the great mansion, the Fathers house that Jesus has prepared for His people,
are different places. Presently, believers who die go to Paradise,
not to the great mansion. He said it is only at the return of
Christ when Jesus will take believers from Paradise and the earth
and bring them into the mansion, His Fathers house
(as He perhaps implied in John 14:2-3). Daniel said that the
great mansion he saw is the New Jerusalem, or at least part of it,
that will one day come down from heaven to earth (see Rev. 21:2, 10).
In any case, I completed my investigation even more convinced that
Daniel Ekechukwu did die on the night of November 30, 2001, and came
back to life on the afternoon of December 2, 2001, in response the
persistent faith of his wife, Nneka. The evidence is very compelling.
I am also more persuaded that Daniels out-of-the body experience
was genuine, and that he did have a divinely-granted opportunity to
see parts of heaven and hell. And I have once again made certain
that I am harboring no unforgiveness in my heart!
By David Kirkwood
By David Kirkwood
www.shepherdserve.org
david@shepherdserve.org
My primary concern is that by discrediting a wonderful miracle performed
by the power of the Holy Spirit, the message that Daniel Ekechukwu
was divinely given to take to the church and the world will be missed
by those who believe the false facts of skeptics.The creator
of the "Deception in the Church" website has done no firsthand
research, nor has he interviewed any eyewitnesses to the miracle.
Even though I have sent him the results of my firsthand research done
in Nigeria that exposes the many errors posted on his website, he
continues to propagate his false facts and skepticism. He doesnt
seem to care about the truth, but only that his own agenda be furthered. As it is, his agenda could hinder an important and very biblical message
from being spread to people who need to hear it.
The "Deception in the Church" website has posted a comparison
chart of seven different sources that have reported details of Pastor
Ekechukwus resurrection (see www.deceptioninthechurch.com/ekechart.html).
The introduction to that chart states:
The author then immediately cites another web article on the story
that he says contains details that prove this story is a fabrication (emphasis added). Amazingly, he believes that the entire story
is a fabrication, but the only evidence he offers is a chart that
supposedly shows the differences in how the story has been reported.
Most people realize, of course, that any time different sources report
on the same incident, there are always some discrepancies. If
there were no discrepancies from seven different sources regarding
Daniel Ekechukwu, I would be suspicious that there was collaboration. Discrepancies prove there was no collaboration.
My first thought as I examined the comparison
chart was how many harmonious facts are revealed by the comparison
chart that actually help substantiate the story. The chart actually
reveals much more harmony than disharmony among the sources cited.
My second observation was that the one negative source cited was the
report of an atheist, Leo Igwe, whose article is found at the web
site address www.secularhumanism.org/library/aah/igwe_11_3.htm.
His article reveals his great bias against any miracles as well as
against the existence of God. His stated bio is:
In the article cited in the comparison chart, Leo Igwe calls the
resurrections of Jesus and Lazarus folktales! I wondered
why such a person would be considered a trustworthy source to be quoted
by a Christian.
My third observation, when I read the actual source articles
cited in the comparison study, was how harmonious all the articles
were. I would say the facts presented in each article/interview
were 98% harmonious among each other, if not more. Yet the creator
of the chart looked for the tiniest scrap of a disharmony with the
intention of disproving the miracle,and simply exposed his own bias.
My fourth observation, as I studied the chart further, were the obvious
intentional misrepresentations of what was stated in the source articles.
Numerous facts presented in the comparison chart are deceptive, which
is not good for a web site that claims to be dedicated to exposing
deception. I have reproduced that chart and added an additional
column on the left that includes my comments on each of the comparisons. In those comments, I also expose the misrepresentations of what was
stated in the source articles.
In the same article, the author states:
I dont doubt that CFAN has made money selling the video
about Daniels resurrection. But it seems somewhat hypocritical
for the creator of the Deception in the Church website
to be so critical when he sells plenty of videos from his own website.
If someone purchased everything he has for sale, it would cost hundreds
of dollars. Moreover, I dont believe that the Bible states
that making money legitimately is wrong. Rather, how it is spent
is the issue, and CFAN requires millions of dollars a year in order
to reach the millions of people it reaches with the gospel at every
African crusade. Additionally, the CFAN video has not made Daniel
Ekechukwu a rich man as the author states, which makes his statement
a published lie. Daniel doesnt receive any royalties from
the sale of the video. The truth is that, not too long ago,
Daniel Ekechukwu was given a large sum of money from a wealthy American
to purchase a very nice home in Lagos, Nigeria. He used the majority
of the money, however, to purchase a PA system, a generator, lights,
a platform and truck to use for his own evangelistic crusades where
he calls sinners to repentance. Daniel says that earthly things
now mean nothing to him. He lives in a crowded, dirty city in
a Third World country, while the creator of the Deception in the Church
website lives in Hawaii.
A second article found at the Deception in the Church website is also highly critical, titled, Raised From The
Dead by Reinhard Bonnke Oh Really? (see www.deceptioninthechurch.com/bonnke2.html).
The author first skeptically questions if Daniel Ekechukwu and the
name Dan Eke that is written on the death certificate
are the same person. The answer is, they are. Any Nigerian
could have explained that to him had he bothered to investigate it.
The author then alleges collusion between Bonnke and Ekechukwu, stating
that Bonnke was previously involved with the church that Daniel Ekechukwu
was pastoring at the time. However, he offers absolutely no
proof at all for his statement. It is pure speculation, and
because it is not true, it is a published lie. The truth is,
Bonnke never met Daniel until some time after Daniel was resurrected.
The author then makes many errors in recounting the story of Daniels
body being taken to various medical facilities, and then asks questions
based on his own wrongly reported information. For example,
he wrongly states that Daniel was first taken to the Federal
Medical Center in Boromyuo, and then asks concerning the report
of Daniels wife coming to the hospital after his accident, Was
she with him when he had his accident in the Mercedes? Or did she
have to travel 1 1/2 to 2 hours from her home in Onitsha? In either
case, why was this not mentioned?
It was, of course, never reported that Nneka was with Daniel when
he had his accident. Neither did she have to travel two hours
from her home in Onitsha to Boromyuo to see him in the hospital because
there is no place called Boromyuo nor was Daniel taken to a hospital
there. Daniel was first taken to a hospital in Onitsha called the
St. Charles Borromeo hospital, just a few minutes from his home and
the place of his accident. And to answer why this was not mentioned
is simple. There is no need to mention what didnt occur.
The authors speculations become almost comical as he continues.
He suggests that perhaps the embalming fluid that was injected into
Daniels body put him into a trance and also alleviated his pain
until he regained consciousness two days later, or that perhaps Daniels
body was injected with something else that put his body into a catatonic
state! Moreover, from simply looking at a CFAN photo of resurrected
Daniel and the mortician looking at the coffin where Daniels
body was laid for several hours, the author skeptically questions
if Daniel could fit into the coffin! (And the view of the coffin
is from the foot-end panel!)
The author questions why Daniels body didnt decay and
smell after two days. As I have stated in my reports from the
facts of my firsthand research, there were obviously miraculous things
happening to Daniels body while it lay in the mortuary.
The mortician twice heard angels singing at night in his mortuary.
Could they have been praising God for the great miracle He was about
to do, and the important message that would be forthcoming? And is
it not written in Scripture of Jesus body that His Father did
not allow it to undergo decay while He was dead? (see Acts 2:27; 13:35). Is not the God who can resurrect a dead body also able to keep that
dead body from decaying for two days?
The author asks if the Bishops son, Pastor Paul, is an authority
on rigor mortis. If not, the author says, then the report of
Daniels rigor mortis should not have been included in the CFAN
report! I would suspect that it wouldnt take an expert
on rigor mortis to determine if someones non-breathing body
is stiff.
The author asks why there are no scars evident on Daniel after his
resurrection as a result of his head allegedly breaking the windshield
of his car. First, it has never been reported by anyone that
Daniels head broke the windshield of his car. Secondly,
I dont think his head did hit the windshield. Everyone
I interviewed, including the mortician, never mentioned any cuts on
Daniels forehead. They all said there was blood coming
from his nose and mouth. Third, would it not be possible for
God to heal those whom He raises from the dead? In fact, if
God didnt heal those whom He resurrects, they would die from
what originally killed them.
After admitting that Bonnke stated publicly on TV that the miracle
was to Gods glory, the author then accuses Bonnke
of seeking glory for the miracle because of a Nigerian newspaper headline
he also showed on the same TV program that read, Bonnke Raises
Man from Death in Onitsha. The author asks, Is this
giving glory to the Lord or to Bonnke?
The answer, of course, is that Bonnke didnt write the headline
on that Nigerian newspaper. And what continues to become evident
is the authors absurd search to find the smallest fault with
Bonnke. For example, he next asks, If they claim that
simply bringing Dan Eke into the presence of the anointed
Bonnke effected his resurrection, then why did it effect the death
of countless others? He then goes on to list five web
addresses for newspaper articles in the same African newspaper that
report of people who have been trampled to death by the throngs of
people who attended some of Bonnkes African crusades.
This kind of logic is amazing. First, no person has ever claimed that simply bringing Dan Eke into the presence of the anointed
Bonnke effected his resurrection. Clearly it was Nnekas
God-given faith that effected her husbands resurrection, and
she believes she was divinely directed to take her husbands
body to a church where Bonnke was preaching. She believed that
the anointing would be so strong where Bonnke was preaching that it
could raise her husband, just as we read in Scripture of a woman who
believed that if she got her dead son to Elijah, he would be resurrected
(see 2 Kings 4:18-37). She believed that Elijah was anointed
by God, and her faith brought her son back to life.
Second, it was not because people were brought into Bonnkes
presence that some were trampled to death. It was the result
of crowds of people who, by their own choices, became uncontrollable.
I would suggest that the responsibility for those deaths lies with
those who started pushing against the crowds and the Nigerian authorities
for not preparing for better crowd control. Having been to Nigeria
many times, I know it is a lawless and dangerous place, and criminals
abound. One of the newspaper articles cited in this article relates
how ruthless men took advantage of the pandemonium and began raping
helpless women right in public. Westerners have no conception
of what can happen in Africa. It is very conceivable and even
probable that certain persons intended and succeeded in starting a
stampede that resulted in the deaths. It is quite possible in
Nigeria for such a thing to be done for the expressed purpose of gaining
bad press for Reinhard Bonnke.
Most Western evangelists would be afraid to preach in the kinds of
places that Bonnke holds his crusades. But who in their right
mind would place the blame on Bonnke for those deaths? We might as
well blame the owner of Fords Theater for the death of President
Lincoln. And what logical person would ever try to expose Daniels
Ekechukwus resurrection as a fraud because of the fact that
selfish people at some of Bonnkes crusades have become uncontrollable
and crushed other people to death under their feet?
The author asks, Why are there never dead raisings in America
where medical histories and authorities can be easily contacted?
That is a question only God could answer. He is the only one
who can raise the dead. I suspect that God knows, however, that
few sinners in the U.S. would repent as a result of anyones
resurrection. God cant even get alleged Christian ministers
to believe in a resurrection that occurred in Africa that is overwhelmingly
substantiated by many proofs.
Stooping to his lowest, the author asks where Reinhard Bonnke was
on September 11th, 2001, as if Bonnke could have saved the lives of
those who perished at the Twin Towers in New York! Bonnke has never
claimed power to resurrect the dead. He readily admits publicly
that he had nothing to do with the miracle of Daniels resurrection,
and wasnt there when it happened.
Finally, the author claims that Daniel Ekechukwus near-death
vision from heaven is patently unbiblical. However, he cites
not a single scripture to show that Daniels experience was unbiblical.
Rather he just asks some questions based on his own misunderstanding
of the facts and his unusual logic.
He asks, First, is a Christian pastor going to be taken to heaven
then to hell? Isnt hell only for the unregenerate?
I ask, Where does Scripture say that God will never take a pastor
who has died, one whom He intends to resurrect, to show him heaven
and hell? Arent heaven and hell two real places?
Doesnt God want everyone to believe those two places exist?
Arent they mentioned in the Bible repeatedly? Didnt
Jesus talk about those places? Didnt Jesus Himself descend
to hell (as Christians recite in the Apostles Creed) at some
time after His death and preach to the spirits in prison (see 1 Pet.
3:18-20). But (to quote the author) Isnt hell only for
the unregenerate? Then what was Jesus doing there? And didnt
the apostle John see the future Lake of Fire (see Rev. 20:10, 14-15)?
But, Isnt hell only for the unregenerate? And wasnt
Paul caught up into the third heaven? What was God doing, taking
these people to hell and heaven? Poor God didnt know He
was bound by the rules of a discernment minister who lives
in Hawaii.
The author says, Even Lazarus didnt go to hell.
So? Is Lazarus experience binding on every other human?
And incidentally, Lazarus did see into hell (just like Daniel) and
saw the torment of the rich man. But isnt hell only for
the unregenerate? the author asked. If this author is correct,
then Lazarus must have been unregenerate, because people who get to
look into hell like Daniel Ekechukwu must be unregenerate.
The truth is, being cast into hell is only for the unsaved.
But why cant God take someone else to the gate of hell to look
in?
The author says, If Daniel did go to hell then why would God
give him a second chance to come back and give a message that is already
warned of in Gods Word?
If such logic is valid, then why should any preacher warn of hell,
since it is already warned of in Gods Word? What kind of logic is this?
The message given to Daniel while he was dead was not only concerning
the realities of heaven and hell, but of the desperate need of the
church to get ready to stand at Christs judgment seat.
Specifically, Daniel was given an important message concerning forgiveness,
something Jesus solemnly spoke of and something that has been ignored
by much of the church. Daniel was sent back because God loves
us all, and He doesnt want anyone to die unprepared.
The author says, Second, the request to Lazarus will never be
granted. No one in hell will ever get a drink of water or be
saved.
Daniel Ekechukwu has never said that anyone in hell would get a drink
of water or be saved. Additionally, the rich man didnt request
to be saved, so the author misrepresents what Daniel has said and
what the Bible clearly states.
The specific request that the angel told Daniel would be granted was
the rich mans request that Lazarus, or someone, would come back
from the dead and warn his five sinful brothers to repent. His
request was denied because the five brothers all knew full well what
Moses and the prophets had said, and Abraham knew that they would
not repent if someone rose from the dead.
Obviously, when the angel told Daniel that the rich mans request
was going to be granted to this generation, he did not mean that Lazarus
would be resurrected for the sake of the rich mans five wicked
brothers. Anyone could see that. Rather, he simply meant
that Daniel would come back to life to warn the wicked people of his
generation. And that is what he has been doing ever since, and people
have been repenting by the thousands. If Daniel would not have
had his experience, it is safe to say that the large majority of those
people would not have repented.
The author writes, Third, the warning of hell from the Bible
is strong and consistent. Is the Gospel message not enough for
people to believe without angels having to allegedly take people on
a tour of hell, which has never happened in the Bible? If not
then God should have been sending people back from hell all along.
God has not limited Himself to only the written word of the Bible
or the gospel message being preached in order to accomplish His purposes
or to warn sinners. Many, many times He has given certain servants
special supernatural experiences and callings to accomplish His purposes.
He has also done many unusual things, miracles, to get peoples
attention in order to get them to repent.
If one accepted the logic of this author, one could ask, Why
would God need to speak to Moses through a burning bush, or give Ezekiel
and Daniel wonderful and complex and sometimes incomprehensible visions?
Why would God have to use a virgin girl to come into the world? Why
would God need to shine a great light on Saul of Tarsus to get him
to repent? Wasnt the Bible or the gospel message enough?
Why was Jesus transfigured before Peter, James and John? Why
did Jesus perform all those miracles? Wasnt just preaching
the gospel enough? Why was John given those strange revelations he
recorded in the final book of the Bible? And the list could go on
and on.
Every miracle in the Bible is a special testimony often designed to
get peoples attention. God has obviously never considered the Bible or the gospel message proclaimed to be enough.
And dont forget, it is in the Bible where we read about all
those miracles. If anyone should believe that God does miracles to
accomplish His purposes or to get people to wake up and repent, it
should be people who read the Bible. Yet so many who claim to
believe the Bible, like this author, ignore or deny the clear facts
of one of the greatest miracles God has done in a long time.
The author writes, I suspect that if this were a true vision
that God would be warning us about apostasy in the church and to stay
away from false teachers like Reinhard Bonnke
This, in one sense, is very true, and in fact, is what Daniels
experience was all about. Daniel is now warning us about
apostasy in the church. But he is not warning to stay away from
false teachers like Reinhard Bonnke who, for example,
said publicly during an interview with Pat Robertson regarding the
message Daniel Ekechukwu is preaching:
The kind of false teachers Daniel is warning about are those who,
like so many today, preach a false gospel of false grace that requires
no repentance and no holiness. He is warning against false teachers
who say that there is nothing Christians can do to forfeit their
salvation. He is warning the church that Jesus really meant
what He said about the necessity of forgiveness, and that God will
indeed reinstate our formerly-forgiven sins if we refuse to forgive
others, just as Jesus promised (see Matt. 6:14-15, 18:21-35).
Unfortunately, the creator of the Deception in the Church
website has taken a posture against Daniel Ekechukwu and what God
is trying to say through Daniel Ekechukwu. He is calling the
mighty, glorious, and holy work of the Holy Spirit in raising Daniel
Ekechukwu from the dead to be only a fraud, and he has no evidence.
By David Kirkwood