Heysham Arms

The Hissem-Montague Family
Montague Arms

Home | Gernet Forebears | In England | In America | Other English Colonies | Montague Family | Other Family's

The John Heesom Line

This page begins the story of my family in America. The earliest record is when John Heesom acted as a witness to a land sale in Burlington, New Jersey in October 1686. Because this is such an early date for this region I assume that John was an emigre and born in England.

I believe our John was born between 1640 and 1660. This would mean that John was between 27 and 47 years old when, in 1687, he and two other men bought the grist mill in Burlington. I'm guessing that 27 is about the lower limit of an age at which we would expect a man to have the extra cash to make such a purchase. It would also mean he was no more than 65 when he died in 1705.

Historical Timeline: The Commonwealth Period:
1649-1658 Oliver Cromwell

After Charles I was tried and beheaded, and after a tumultuous period of Parliamentary rule, the leading general of the Puritan cause, Cromwell, was made Lord Protector. He ruled England through Parliament, but his absoute power over the Army made him a virtual dictator.

1658-1659 Richard Cromwell

Richard lacked his father’s political skills and General Monk, one of the Civil War's great generals, engineered the restoration of the House of Stuart.


(18) John Heesom (c1650)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600)

My G-G-G-G-G-G-G-Grandfather. John's name has been in this genealogy for some time, but I had not fully appreciated his significance. Additionally, new information has become available that strengthens his position as a forebear for Thomas, below.

In America John was identified as either John Heesom, Heesome or Heesem in court records, and as John Heesham for the administration of his estate in 1705. Hesam and Heesam were very early versions of the name of the village of Heysham and of the Heysham family in Lancaster in the 13th century. The Hesom and Heesom spellings emerged in the late-16th / mid-17th century. Based on research into the Heesom family of Cheshire and Yorkshire, the Heesom name could also be a variant of Esom or Easam, though which came first I can not say.

Neither Hesom nor Heesom is found in southwestern England and a single occurence in London was the only one found in southeastern England until the 18th century. So it would appear that our John Heesom must come from northern England, with the probability highest for Yorkshire, where the Heesom usage was most common at this early date.

Contrarily, the Heesham name was found almost exclusively in Lancashire during the 1600's. There were only two occurences of the Heesham spelling in Yorkshire, recorded in 1693 and 1694, there were more in the neighboring Cheshire, but not until 1759, and none in the rest of England until the 19th century. I think that's a pretty strong indicator that John, who would have been born in the middle of the 17th century, could also have come from Lancashire.

The best fit, at this time, is the Hesom/Heesom family living in the West Riding of Yorkshire, in the villages of Crofton, Wragby and Ackworth. None used the Heesham spelling of the name, but they were a numerous family who lived just north of Sheffied, in today's South Yorkshire. They are impossible to ignore because, as you'll see below, so many of the Burlington emigree's came from this region.

I recently discovered a John Esume, the son of George Esume of Crofton, who was baptized on 17 March 1650 at the parish church of Crofton. While the spelling of the name is fairly far removed from what I've been used to, phonetically it's a 'dropped-H' match for Heesom. In such a small village as Crofton could there have been both a Hesom family and an unrelated Esume one, both headed by a man named George? The other children of George Hesom were, per their baptismal records, William Hesom, Elizabeth Esom, Anna Easom, and George Heesom.

I've just received an even stronger indication that this family of Yorkshire might be closely related. A set of DNA samples has linked a descendent of John Heesom of Burlington, that is an American, with a member of the Heesom family today living in the East Riding of Yorkshire. The match was of 35 of 37 markers. I'm not sure exactly what this means. At minimum it shows that our family had an English origin, as expected, but while it means that the East Riding family and the American family had a common ancestor about 12 or so generations back, it doesn't tell us whether that ancestor was necessarily in the Yorkshire line or that of Lancashire. It is as if we've gotten a single line of bearing; it gives us a direction, but not a location. We need results from members of the Heysham family, those descendents of the Indian Heyshams and the American, and the Heesom's of Cheshire to help us triangulate our origins. See Heysham's of the East Riding for more about that family's history. By the way, 12 generations back would be John Heesom's grandfather, or, as I have it above, (16) William Hesome (c1577).

Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings; Restoration of the House of Stuart:
1660-1685 Charles II

Charles II led a bawdy court famous for its royal mistresses. It was not famous of its intellect. Restricted in his income by Parliament, the King accepted money from France’s King Louis XIV.

Dutch colonies in America were seized and given to Charles' brother James, the Duke of York (hence New York city).

1665 - Bubonic Plague strikes London and 70,000 die. This was the last major outbreak of the disease.
1665 - The Great Fire levels London (and frees the city of the plague).

The Quakers found colonies in West Jersey and Pennsylvania in 1675 and 1682.

While still in England John learned a trade, as a carpenter. This was a skilled occupation, entry to which was controlled by a guild. John's father would have paid a fee to apprentice his young son to a master carpenter, and probably had to cover the cost of his room and board at the master carpenter's shop. This implies at least a moderate income. John's father was probably either a tradesman or a "statesman," that rising middle-class of farmers who owned their own land, or estate.

What Sort of Man was John Heesom?

At the time he emigrated, in the 1680's, John was probably in his mid-30's. He was probably about 5' 6" tall, or about average for the day, with brown hair and, perhaps, blue eyes - a family trait. At his age he should have saved enough money to get married, or to emigrate.

The greatest historical influences in his life had been the Civil War, both in its violence and vision of freedom, and, subsequently, the Restoration of the King. He had grown up immersed in the mythology of the War. Some of his parent's neighbors would have been in Parliament's army; others attacked and plundered the halls of the absent lords. John probably knew houses in the village that had cabinents or benches which had been "liberated" from some great house. Other effects of the war were less positive to a boy. The Puritans, who were in the ascendency, made certain that both church and school were stictly kept, and little enjoyed. Theater and music making were also proscribed.

When John was about 10 years old all of this changed. The King, Charles II, was restored. The Church of England brought back the pomp of ceremony. The lord of the manor returned and began to assert his ancient rights.

The greatest societal influence on John may have been the rise of Quakerism. These solid, sober men who would not doff their hats or swear an oath probably appealed to a man who was unsettled by the reassertion of ancient privilege. At the same time they did not scare him, as did the harsh certainty of the Puritans.

John was an optimist, because he could see a better future for himself in America. He was not a fatalist, because he was not resigned to living the life of his fathers. He was an indiviudalist, because he took his life and his future into his own hands. If not a Quaker himself, he was sympathetic to the Quakers' ideas about government.

John Heesom had emigrated to the town of Burlington, on Assiscunk Creek, in the Quaker colony of West Jersey by 1686, though this may have occurred as early as 1677. He may have been a Quaker himself. If not, then he had at least been surronded by their debate in the 1670's about finding a place of refuge for the practice of their religion.

John Heeson

A stray. Interestingly, while there are many variants of the name, the use of the ending letter "n" is rarely one of them, except as a transcription mistake. John Heeson was a servant of Charles Carroll of Maryland. "During the 1760's and 1770's three different men oversaw it. The first, John Heeson, was sent to Papa from England in 1763 as a gardener. Annoyed that Heeson had brought along a wife, Papa nonetheless retained him to manage the Folly, but at an annual wage of only twelve pounds sterling, plus a shore of the crop, arrangements that might have precipitated his sudden departure in 1771. Whatever the case, the abrupt exit . . ." - from "Princes of Ireland, Planters of Maryland: A Carroll Saga, 1500-1782"

While East Jersey was settled by English and Dutch colonists from New York, Long Island and New England, the West Jersey colony were settled initially by Quakers. The first revelation of James Fox, the father of Quakerism, occurred in Lancashire and the religion had a many adherents in northern England.

"Quakerism was a radical religion that attracted those generally independent by preaching the virtues of the family as the basic disciplining and spiritualizing authority in society as opposed to that of magistrates and church prelates. Thanks in part to their devotion to the decentralization of authority, many Quakers were more comfortable in the vast spaces of the American forests than were the New Englanders who had come from more densely populated villages in the southeast of England." - from "Daily Life on the Old Colonial Frontier" by James M. Volo and Dorothy Denneen Volo.

The Quaker Colony

In 1664, having seized the Dutch colonies in America, King Charles gave all the lands between the Connecticut and Delaware rivers to his brother, the Duke of York, the future King James II. The Duke in turn gave two court favorites, John Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret, the territory between the Hudson and the Delaware. It was called New Jersey in recognition of Carteret's governance and defense of the Isle of Jersey during the English Civil War.

About this time the Quakers, who were being discriminated against in England, had expressed the desire to find some peaceful place among the islands of the sea or in the wilderness of America where they might freely practice their religion and put into effect their ideas about government. In 1672 their mystic leader, George Fox, had come to America and crossed New Jersey, exploring the region for possible settlement. Fox related that

" . . . ye next day wee passed 50 miles, and found an old house, which ye Indians had forced the people to desert, and gott us some fire at ye heade of Dallaway bay; and the next day wee swam our horses over a River about a mile at twise [?], first to an Island & then to ye Maine land, the Island is called uper dinidocke [Mattineconk or Tennekonck]."
The deserted house was the tavern of Peter Jegou, who had been driven from it by Indians in 1670, and was located on the eventual site of Burlington. The island is today known as Burlington island.

John Lord Berkeley, insolvent as many of the sprendthrift nobles of Charles II's court were, sold his share of the Jersey colony for ready cash in 1673 to Edward Byllynge, a member of the Society of Friends, or Quakers. Byllinge, however, was not able to consumate the deal due to his own financial problems. Eventually three other Quakers, William Penn, Gawen Lawrie and Nicholas Lucas, were appointed as trustees of his estate. Penn thus became familiar with this tract of land which influenced his eventual choice for his own colony.

The leadership of the Society of Friends was eager to found a colony in America where they would be safe from persecution, and in which they could establish a commonwealth resting on the political, moral, and social tenets of their faith, what they called their "Holy Experiment." Byllynge and the trustees spent three years developing a plan for creating in New Jersey a haven for their fellow Quakers. A division line separating their lands, to be known as West Jersey [the Delaware river basin and southern New Jersey] from those of Lord Carteret's, then known as East Jersey [the coast and northern New Jersey], was established. West Jersey was organized as a joint stock company. The territory was divided into 100 properties to be sold at 350 pounds each. Any purchase of a share, or a part thereof, carried with it the right to participation in the government of the province.

The genius of the Quaker colonies, both in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, was that they were designed as not just asylums for Quakers, but for all Christians, of whatever country, who wanted to flee religious oppression. Their form of government, too, was liberal and this acted as a magnet for colonization. A constitution provided for the annual election of a representative assembly, guaranteed freedom of worship and trial by jury. Byllynge became the non-resident governor.

West Jersey was then opened for sale and the trustees circulated an advertisement throughout the kingdom inviting Friends and others to purchase the lands and promote emigration. The advertisement advised that,

"whosoever had a desire to be concerned in this intended plantation should weigh the thing well before the Lord, and not headily and rashly conclude on any such remove, and that they do not offer violence to the tender love of their near kindred, but soberly and conscientiously endeavour to obtain their good-will and the unity of Friends where they live."
Skilled artisans, Carpenters, Blacksmiths, Masons, Taylors, Weavers, Shoemakers, Tanners, and Brickmakers, were sought especially.

Commissioners were sent out by the proprietors with power to buy land from the natives. In contrast to the story of the purchase of Manhattan, the Indians of the Delaware river received much more than $24 in trinkets. For example, a tract of land extending twenty miles on the Delaware River, lying between Oldman's Creek and Timber Creek, was purchased from the locals for "30 match-coats, 20 guns, 30 kettles, 1 great kettle, 30 pair of hose, 20 fathoms of duffels, 30 petticoats, 30 narrow hoes, 30 bars of lead, 15 small barrels of powder, 70 knives, 30 Indian axes, 70 combs, 60 pair of tobacco tongs, 60 tinshaw looking-glasses, 120 awl-blades, 120 fish-hooks, 2 grasps of red paint, 120 needles, 60 tobacco boxes, 120 pipes, 200 bells, 100 Jews-harps, and 6 anchors of rum."

An earlier, independent, Quaker expedition led by John Fenwick sailed aboard the GRIFFIN [GRIFFITH] in the fall of 1675 and landed at what became New Salem, New Jersey.

In August 1677 a group of 230 Quakers from Yorkshire and London sailed on the KENT and founded the town of Burlington on Assiscunk Creek. The town was initially called New Beverley, for a village in the East Riding of Yorkshire northwest of Hull. This was later changed to Burlington, for a village on the North Sea coast of the East Riding called Bridlington, pronouned by the locals as Burlington. Of historical interest, as the KENT sailed down the Thames enroute to the West Jersey colony it passed the barge of King Charles II. He asked who they were and when told they were Quakers bound for America he gave them his blessing.

In October the WILLING MINDE [the name is theological, as in "a willing mind to serve God"], with 70 settlers from London, and the Flie-boot MARTHA, from Hull with 114 Yorkshire Quakers, arrived. The SHIELD followed, also from Hull, with another 100 in December 1678 [a total of about 500].

At the site of the Burlington settlement the Yorkshire and London Quakers divided the region between them. The Yorkshire commissioners "chose from the falls of Delaware [Trenton] down [to the Rancocas, or Raccoon Creek, south of Burlington], which was hence called the First Tenth [or Yorkshire Tenth]." In the town itself 20 properties were laid out, 10 for the Yorkshire proprietors and 10 for the London, with a main street, called High Street, down the middle. Each lot was ten or eleven acres which was for a house, an orchard and a garden. Farm and pasture land were outside the town.

"Here is good land enough lies void, would serve many thousands of families; and we think if they cannot live here, they can hardly live in any place in the world." - from a letter by "John Crips to Henry Stacy, written "from Burlington, on Delaware River,the 26th of the eight month, 1677."
Burlington would become the second most prominent Quaker community in America, after Philadelphia.

By 1679 there were 800 Quakers living along the Delaware. They were joined by Irish Quakers from Dublin in 1681 who settled in Gloucester county, afterwards known as the Irish Tenth. The influx after 1682 decreased dramatically when William Penn founded his colony, which became the new magnet for colonization. By the end of the 17th century the West Jersey population was more than 3300 with nearly 70% of them being Quakers of English or Irish origin.

In 1687 Byllynge was succeeded by Dr. Daniel Coxe (1640-1730), physician to Queen Anne. At about this same time a Quaker Meeting House was first built, hexagonal in shape. Prior to this the Quakers had been meeting in private homes. In 1691 the doctor sold out to the West Jersey Society, a London-based company of real estate investors. At this point affairs in West Jersey ceased to be dominated by the Quakers. In 1702 the Society surrendered control of the government to the crown.

See The Historic County of Burlington and The History of Nova Caesarea for early histories of the region.

I'm still trying to decide who our John Heesom was. Note that many of the Yorkshire Quakers came from the region around Sheffield, including George Hutchinson, Samuel Oldale, Michael Newbold, Thomas Schooley and Mahlon Stacy. At this time, just 20 miles north of Sheffield, there was a family of Heesom's living in the Yorkshire villages of Wragby, Crofton, and Ackworth. Could John have been from Yorkshire and come to Jersey as a skilled laborer in the employ of one of these men?

Ships Arriving from England

The GRIFFITH from London arrived in 1675. Its passengers, under John Fenwick, settled Salem. The PHENIX, Matthew Shearer master, arrived in 1677 with more Salem settlers.

The KENT, Gregory Marlow master, arrived from London at Newcastle in August 1677 with 200 passengers. "It should be noted that many passengers alleged to have been aboard were from Yorkshire, Northamptonshire, and other northern counties. They probably loaded at a northern port, perhaps Hull or Liverpool, before the KENT arrived at London, which is why they do not appear in the London loadings." - Donna Speer Ristenbatt.

Thomas Olive - of Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, haberdasher
Samuel Lovett - married in Devonshire house, London

The MARTHA, a "flie-boat," of Bridlington, Yorkshire, Thomas Wildtuys [Wildbuys, Wharcup] master, sailed from Hull in August 1677. It arrived in West Jersey in September 1677 bringing "114 passengers" for the Yorkshire Tenth, at Burlington. A flie, or fly, boat, right, was a flat bottomed Dutch vessel with a high stern and broad buttocks. They were of about 600 tons and mainly used for local coastal traffic. While a poor choice for ocean travel, note that Sir Walter Raliegh had one in his fleet that sailed to Virginia.

Thomas Wright - of Howden, East Riding, Yorkshire, about 20 miles west of Hull [9 miles northwest of Snaith], yeoman
Thomas Schooley - of Aston, West Riding, Yorkshire, about 10 miles east of Sheffield
Thomas Hooten [Houghton] - of London, chandler
Samuel Oldale [Odas, Otis] - of Sheffield, Yorkshire, mason
Joshua Boare - of Drainfield, Derbyshire
Marmaduke Horsman - of Yorkshire
Thomas Ellis and John Barts [Batts] - servants sent by George Hutchinson of Sheffield, Yorkshire

WILLING MIND[E], John Newcomb master, sailed from London with 60 to 70 passengers, arriving in November 1677. Some settled in Salem and others in Burlington.

The SHIELD, Daniel Tower [Towes] master, also came out of Hull in "tenth month," December, 1678.

John and Godfrey Newbold - of Woodhouse, Handsworth parish, Yorkshire
Thomas Revell - of Derbyshire, scrivener, gentleman
Mahlon Stacy - of Handsworth, Yorkshire, tanner. Handsworth is just southeast of Sheffield.
Godfrey Hancock - of Handsworth, Yorkshire
John and Thomas Lambert - of Handsworth, Yorkshire [Southwingfield, Derbyshire, joiner & tanner?]
Robert Schooley - of Hemsworth, Yorkshire, just a few miles from Ackworth [Notts?]
James Pharo[e] - of Drayton House, Nottingham, Burlington county
Richard Tattersal -
Thomas Potts - of Handsworth, Yorkshire or Chesterfield, Derbyshire [which is only 12 miles away, the parish is on the border with Derbyshire], Baptist, tanner
John Heyres [Heyers, Ayres]

Ship from London in 1678,

John Hollinshead, gent.
William & Abraham Hewlings
George Hutchinson - of Sheffield, distiller
Thomas Hutchinson - of Beverley, just north of Hull, Yorkshire, tanner

SUCCESS, Stephen Nichols master, from London, in April 1679.

ELIZABETH AND SARAH, Richard Friend master, in 1679.

ELIZABTH AND MARY, of Weymouth, Dorset, in June 1679. This may be the same ship as above.

JACOB AND MARY, Richard Moore master, in September 1679.

Richard Ridgway
After 1679 the arrivals were much more numerous.

It is interesting that a John Heyres, probably a single man, came to Burlington, New Jersey from Hull, Yorkshire aboard the SHIELD in 1678 - from "The History of Burlington, New Jersey," by William E. Schermerhorn. While Heyres may simply be a phonetic spelling of the common Ayres, as in Lew Ayres, it intriguingly contains elements of the Heysham name and could be a mistranscription. A John Ayres does show up in Somerset county in the record of New Jersey wills circa 1739. Shipmates of John Heyres on the SHIELD included Godfrey Hancock and Thomas Revell, who teamed together with John Heesom to buy a mill, below, and John and Godfrey Newbold, two other single men. John Newbold's father, Michael, eventually ended up owning John Heesom's share of the mill.

Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings, The Stuarts
1685-1688 James II

Brother to Charles. He publicy converted to Catholicism causing the people to fear a forced return of the Catholic religion upon his assension to the throne. The English Revolution followed the birth of a male heir to the King. The King and his household fled to France. The King's son, which the Protestant’s refused to believe legitimate, became known as the “Old Pretender.”

A John Haracis signed the Concessions and Agreements of the colony. Who was he? He, like John Heyres, disappears from history after this one appearance. I'd like to see the original document to check the spelling [the simplest explanation, of course, is that the name was Harris]. There are a number of names that appear to be mistranscriptions. These include Fospe Ontstont [Ontstout], Turrse Plese [Psese], Nethorp, Surege, and Pledger. William Heulings [Hewlings?] catches my eye as well.

Strange to say, however, I have found a reference to Fospe Ontstout in the records of Elsingburgh, an early Swedish colony near Salem, New Jersey where some of the Quaker emigree's settled. There is recorded a colloquy between Fospe and his wife Terrese, who spends all of his money looking after the needs of strangers, reducing him to beggary.

The Concessions and Agreements of the Proprietors, Freeholders and Inhabitants of the Province of West New Jersey In America

When the Quakers made their plans to settle their newly purchased colony of West Jersey they understood that there were already settlers in the area, mainly Dutch and Swedes. There was some question as to whether these earlier settlers would recognize the new proprietors and subject themselves to their government. The Concessions and Agreements were drawn up in 1677 as an agreement between the Proprietors, the new Quaker Freeholders and the current inhabitants. The proprietors and settlers about to sail for West Jersey signed it in England. The document was then brought to West Jersey where it was circulated and signed by many of the settlers already there.

The "Concessions and Agreements" reflected both the Quaker's religious beliefs and their adherence to the ideals of the Enlightenment. It was the most libertarian document of its age and has been called "the broadest, sanest, and most equitable charter draughted for any body of colonists up to this time." It established the West Jersey colony's common law and its civil liberties. These included annual elections with a secret ballot, an expanded concept of democracy through the establishment of a powerful Assembley elected by all free men, no taxation without the consent of the governed,

"They are not to impose or suffer to be imposed any Tax Custome or subsidie Tollage Assessment or any Other duty whatsoever upon any colour or pretence how specious soever upon the said Province and Inhabitants thereof without their owne consent first had or other then what shall be imposed by the authority and consent of the Generall Assembly and that only in manner and for the good ends and uses as aforesaid."
trial by jury, safeguards against bribery and corruption, open meetings ("sunshine laws"),
"That in every general free Assembly every respective member hath Liberty of speech that no Man be interrupted when speaking ... and that the people have Liberty to come in to hear and be witnesses of the votes and the inclination of the Persons voting."
equal property and legal rights for Native Americans and the most sweeping affirmation of religious freedom to that time.
"That no men, nor number of men upon earth, hath power or authority to rule over men's consciences in religious matters; therefore it is consented, agreed and ordained, that no person or persons whatsoever, within the said province, at any time or times hereafter shall be any ways, upon any pretence whatsoever, called in question, or in the least punished or hurt, either in person, estate or privilege, for the sake of his opinion, judgment, faith or worship towards God, in matters of religion; but that all and every such person and persons, may from time to time, and at all times, freely and fully have and enjoy his and their judgments, and the exercise of their consciences, in matters of religious worship throughout all the said province."
This generous document made the West Jersey colony an attractice haven for both economic adventurers and spiritual pilgrims.

This document was agreed upon and signed in England by 151 emigrants. These included Edward Byllinge, his trustees, William Penn and Gawen Lawrie, Yorkshire commissioners, William Emley and Robert Stacy, and Thomas Barton, William Biddle, Thomas Budd, John Butcher, Thomas Eves, Thomas French, Thomas Gardiner, Godfrey Hancock, Thomas Hooten, George Hutchinson, Samuel Lovett, John Newbold, Samuel Oldale [Oldaled], Thomas Revel, Thomas Schooley, Isaac Smart, John Snowden, Mahlon Stacy, and Thomas Wright. Many of these men would become the elected representatives of the colony in 1682.
- Note that William Budd had a brother, Thomas, who wrote "Good Order Established in Pennsylvania and New Jersey" in 1685. The Budds, including brothers James and John as well, arrived in Burlington in 1678. Thomas Budd was, with Thomas Gardiner, appointed one of the receivers general of the colony and a land commissioner and member of the governor's council. He lived "above the falls," in Trenton.

The original Council of West Jersey Proprietors was composed of men who had purchased large blocks of land, and were designated by the British crown to govern the surveying, granting, and purchasing of land within West Jersey. The Proprietors negotiated with the local tribes of the Lenape to purchase land in the Burlington area, and also approved the Concessions and Agreements of 1676, the original laws of the region.

Proprietorships have been transferred by inheritance and in some cases by sale of land, and the holders of proprietorships have met in Burlington every April since 1688. The complete records of the Council of West Jersey Proprietors are housed in the Surveyor General's office on West Broad Street near High Street.

John Heesom was not otherwise named as a passenger in any of the early vessels or as an owner of one of the original lots in the town. This may mean that he came over as a servant. Almost all of the proprietors were listed as "with his wife, children and servants." If he had come over as an indentured servant he would have served his master for 4 years to pay for his passage, say from 1678 to 1682. Samuel Smith noted in his 1765 book, "History of Nova Cæsarea,"

"Many that came servants, succeeded better than some that brought states [estates]; the first inured to industry, and the ways of the country, became wealthy . . ."
Note that records of the Burlington, West Jersey colony, after its initial settlement, begin in the fall of 1680 with the surveys of Thomas Revel.

John Heesom first enters recorded history when he witnessed a deed of sale of Peter Harvey to Thomas Curtis.

"10 October 1686, Peter & Sarah Harvey, yeoman, of First Tenth, West New Jersey to Thomas Curtis, husbandman, of Buggbrook, West New Jersey, L4, 40 acres . . . service of said Sarah to Benjamin Scott. Signed Peter Harvey and Sarah Harvey. Wit: Christopher Snoden, John Heesom & Thomas Revell" - from "West Jersey, New Jersey Deed Records, 1676-1721" by John David Davis
The service of said Sarah I take to be an indenture, perhaps for housework and sewing, though why it was given to Benjamin Scott I cannot say. This may be a confusion caused by the break in the text. I note that in 1681 Thomas Curtis' daughter, also called Sarah, had bound herself as servant for 4 years to Benjamin Scott for 40 acres. Perhaps this notation referred to that service. Another version of this deed makes this clear:
"1686 Oct. 10. D[itt]o [Bond]. Peter Harvey of the First Tenth yeoman and his wife Sarah to Thomas Curtis of Buggbrook, W.J., husbandman, for 40 acres in the Second Tenth, part of the land formerly belonging to Benjamin Scott dec'd, and by him assigned to Sara Harvey (supra, p. 111)." - from "Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State, 1614-1703" by William Nelson and Berthold Fernow
So Sarah, the daughter of Thomas Curtis, was the wife of Peter Harvey. Thomas Curtis, the son of John Curtis of Assiscunck creek, had held 150 acres on the south branch of Assiscunk Creek, adjoining Peter Harvey, since 1685.

Christopher Snoden was a later witness against John Heesom in a trial for non-payment of a bond in 1690. The next year Snoden took John to court for debt himself. John tried to argue that Snoden, who was a licensed inn-holder, got him drunk so he shouldn't be held responsible for his actions. John lost. Christopher may have been the son of John Snowden, who signed the Concessions and Agreements.

Six months later John Heesom purchased a one-third interest in a grist mill, and the adjoining land, in partnership with Thomas Revell and Godfrey Hancock, two estate-men and signers of the Concessions and Agreements.

"On April 20, 1687, Thomas Wright, then living in Chesterfield township, conveyed six acres of his Burlington plantations [including a mill] to "Godfrey Hancock of Steetly near Burlington, Thomas Revell of Baythorp W.J. [West Jersey], both yeomen, and John Heesom of Burlington, carpenter, on Assiscunk Creek in Burlington township, adjoining Samuel Oldale . . . " - from "Burlington, a Provincial Capital"
Assiscunk creek empties into the Delaware river at the town of Burlington. The name, from the language of the Lenni Lenape Indians, means "muddy place, or stream." To the right is a drawing of a typical water-driven mill of the era. Thomas Wright had originally come from Howden, East Yorkshire, which is about 20 miles west of Hull [9 miles northwest of Snaith], a yeoman. Godfrey Hancock came from Handsworth, Yorkshire, which is just southeast of Sheffield. Thomas Revell came from of Derbyshire, and was described as both a scrivener and a gentleman.

Of the mill, "The second gristmill in the neighborhood of Burlington was located on the Assiscunk Creek — probably on the south side of the creek — a good mile and a half from Burlington. There is some evidence [today] of the dam on both sides of the creek, particularly on Howard Birkett's farm on the southern side. . . . The mill was on the Thomas Wright plantation, on which the Masonic Home now stands." - from "Burlington: a Provincial Capital" by George De Cou. The Masonic Home was an orphanage, and now a retirement home - my, how the country has aged! - on Jacksonville road. The home itself is quite a distance from the creek so this must be a reference to the plantation, not the mill.

I've also seen this sale rendered somewhat differently in another source.

"1687 April 20. D[itt]o [Bond]. Thomas Wright of near Crosswicks, W. J., [which is between Burlington and Trenton] yeoman, to Godfrey Hancock of Steetley near Burlington, Thomas Revell of Baythorp, W. J., both yeomen, and John Heesom [Heeson] of Burlington, carpenter, for 6 acres on Assiscunck Creek in Burlington Township, adjoining Samuel Oldale." - from "Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey; Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State. 1614-1703" by William Nelson, Berthold Fernow or "New Jersey Colonial Records, West Jersey Records: Part 3 - Volume 21 Calendar of Records 1664-1703."
Yet another version of the deed has,
"20 Apr 1687, Thomas Wright, yeoman, of Crosswick, West New Jersey to Godfrey Hancock, yeoman, of Sheetley [sic], near Burlington, West New Jersey, Thomas Revell, yeoman, of Boythorx [sic], West New Jersey & John Heesom, carpenter, of Burlington, West New Jersey, L3, one acre on Assiscuk Creek for a mill. Signed Thomas Wright. Wit: Samuel Wright & Godfrey Hancock Jr." - from "West Jersey, New Jersey Deed Records, 1676-1721" by John David Davis
Note that this version is for one acre vice 6 in the other citations. A price of 3 pounds doesn't seem like a lot of money . . . Note also the witnesses, who were the sons of two of the principals.

John Heesom's Associates

The men John associated with in this land transaction were amongst the most important in this young community.

Godfrey Hancock

He arrived onboard the SHIELD in 1678 and was a signer of the Concessions and Agreements. He had a 200 acre plantation. The Hancocks and the family of Thomas Schooley may have been related. Thomas' father, John, married Isabelle Hancock, the daughter of Robert, in Sheffield, England. He joined Thomas Revell, below, in a lawsuit against Thomas Mann for trespass. Revell and Hancock were sued by Peter Jegou, an early Dutch settler, for the trespass of "these new comers, called Quakers," of his land. Godfrey was one of the first representatives to the West Jersey Assembley, along with Mahlon Stacy, Thomas Wright, and Thomas Revell. By the way, one of the requirements to be in the Assembley was ownership of at least one thousand acres of land.

Thomas Revell

Also Revel. Of Chesterfield, Derbyshire. Thomas was an Anglican and referred to as a "gentleman." He arrived onboard the SHIELD in 1678 and was a signer of the Concessions and Agreements. A cousin to Mahlon Stacy, one of the major creditors of Edward Byllynge. He and Mahlon also appear to have been close to the Thomas Wright family. Revell was active in West Jersey politics. He was appointed by a group of Proprietors as "Agent for the Honorable West Jersey Society in England" to survey and sell land and issue deeds. He served as Surveyor General, Registrar of the Proprietors of West Jersey, and Clerk of the Provincial Assembly. A member of the Governor's council. He was also a Justice of the Court. His house is today at 213 Wood street in Burlington. This house is the oldest building remaining in the region. It was constructed in 1685 by George Hutchinson, a wealthy Quaker distiller, and sold to Thomas Revell who used the house as an office from 1696 to 1699. Local tradition associates this house with young Benjamin Franklin who received gingerbread there as he was en route from Boston to Philadelphia. In the early 19th century the house was purchased by the Annis Stockton Chapter of the DAR to become their clubhouse. The Colonial Burlington Foundation acquired and restored it in the 1950s.

Thomas Wright

Of Howden, East Riding, Yorkshire, which is west of Hull. He and his wife, Ann, arrived from Yorkshire on the ship MARTHA in 1677. Before leaving England he purchased "one fourth part of a propriety of land in West Jersey" from the Yorkshire Quaker company. He was a signer of the Concessions and Agreements, though he was one of the last to do so. While most signed in England, the document was brought to America on the KENT and the later purchasers signed there. He had 500 acres on Assiscunck creek adjoining the town limits. Samuel Oldale held the land next to his. Wright later moved to Chesterfield township and built a plantation of similar size. He was a Quaker.

Samuel Oldale

Or O'Dell. He was a mason, born in Sheffield, Yorkshire and arrived in New Jersey in 1677 on the MARTHA. He was a freeholder and a signer of the Concessions and Agreements. He had a plantation on Assiscunck creek. He built a bridge across the creek and tried to get his neighbors to pay a toll on it. He was famously tried and sentenced in 1690 for having sexual relations with his step-daughter. He was given 30 lashes and she 21. He died in 1722 in Bucks county, Pennsylvania.

How did John fit into this group and what does this association say about John's time of arrival and status in the community? That is, did he come over as an indentured servant, a valued craftsman, or as a man with his own estate? While there is not enough information to really tell, I am willing to make some conjectures.
- First, John must have had some cash in order to take part in the purchase of the mill - there were no banks offering loans and no reason to think his associates would advance him the money. He could have obtained that through years of hard work and frugal living of course, perhaps arriving in the colony well before the 1687 purchase date, but John's subsequent history of indebtedness over a period of almost two decades argue's against this picture of industry and thrift. My guess is that John started with some amount of money, a legacy or a stake from his father, and then let it be frittered away.
- It now appears that John bought other properties as well across the river in Bucks county, Pennsylvania, so he may have had more than a little money. Again, note that John's partners, and those with whom he bought and sold property, were amongst the most well-to-do in the community. I don't think it is a stretch to assume that John belonged to this group.
- Also, I would not assume that just because John was a carpenter that meant he was from a lower, more penurious order. Many of the more successful men in the community had trades. Richard Ridgway, who at one time owned 600 acres in Maidenhead, was a tailor.

As a carpenter John should have been able to make a good living in a new and growing community. Note that the Quaker Meeting House in Burlington had been built by Francis Collins, carpenter, between 1682 and 1687. Did John help?

The Carpenter

Carpenters were considered to be highly skilled craftsman and made anything from furniture to entire houses.

"To become a Carpenter it was usually necessary to join a guild as an apprentice and learn the craft. Most items used during daily life in the Medieval Ages were produced and manufactured by carpenters. Homes, wagons, tables, furniture, tools and utensils were all the creations of these gifted workers. Knowledge of math, woodworking and the use of tools was required. Though many of the implements used were basic in comparison to those employed today, it can be argued that some fine examples of work were produced during the Middle Ages. Kings and nobles often sought out the finest carpenters and kept them retained on their staffs as specialists. Furnishing castles and estates was not only done for decorative purposes but also to demonstrate prestige and status to visitors. Thus a master carpenter was always in demand and could stand to earn high wages."

The Carpenter's Guild was formed in England in 1333 and is now one of the oldest existing social institutions in Great Britain. Craftsmen who knew their trade well and had their own shops were called masters. Lesser workers were known as journeymen and those learning the craft were apprentices. It took an apprentice from 2 to 7 years to become a journeyman. To become a master the journeyman had to pass an examination and make a piece that was judged a masterpiece by the other masters in the guild. Masters were jealous of their position and often made it difficult for journeymen to advance. A journeyman so thwarted might emigrate to America to find greater opportunity.

As towns became organized in the American colonies guilds were established. In 1724 the master carpenters of Philadelphia banded together in the Carpenters Company, the first builder's guild. The guilds played a large role in the coming Revolution. In Boston the carpenters were the "host" group for the Boston Tea Party in 1773. Carpenter's Hall in Philadelphia was built in 1770 to house the carpenter's guild. The Continental Congress met in Carpenters Hall and the Declaration of Independence was signed there.

Other trades also worked in wood. The sawyer sawed the wooden planks for building. A joiner was a highly skilled carpenter who made furniture, similar to a cabinet maker, and other fine-work. A boardwright made tables and chairs. The turner made lathe-turned items, like table legs. A cooper made wooden barrels. A woodcarver made decorative pieces. A wheelwright made wagon wheels. A cartwright built and repaired wooden carts. Here "wright" means craftsman or builder.

Geoffrey Heysome and his son, William, were carpenters of London in this period.

"Samuel wood the son of Tho: wood of waltham Abbey in the County of Essex malster hath putt himselfe appntice to Jeoffrey Heysome of Hounsditch for 7 yeares from michas day 1655 Dated the 28th day of Sept. 1655."

7 December 1669. "Willielmus Heyson filius Galfridi Heyson Civis et Carpenter London po: se appren eidem Galfrido Heyson ejus patri pro 7 ann a die ante diem Dat 7 Decem 1669." [William Heyson, the son of Geoffrey Heyson, citizen and carpenter of London, apprenticed to Geoffrey Heysom his father for 7 years from the day of 7 December 1669]

"Thomas Cocks filius Will. Cocks nuper de St Gyles in le Camps in Com midd waterman defunct po: se appren pred Jeffery Heyson pro septem ann ante Diem Dat 7 Decem 1669."

- from "Records of the Worshipful Company of Carpenters," Volume I: Apprentices' Entry Books 1654-1694. Note, names of Apprentices are distinguished by an asterisk.

The 1/3rd interest John had in the grist mill should have been of great value.

"Gristmills became an important industry in the new province and were frequently the foundation of substantial estates. The miller retained one tenth of the grain as toll and as his overhead was low, the mill being operated by water power, the arrangement proved to be quite profitable. The mill played an important part in the political and social life of the community. Not infrequently the miller was a leading citizen and politics as well as the weather and the crops were discussed while the farmers were waiting for their grist." - from "Burlington, A Provinicial Capital"
The miller has always been depicted in folklore as greedy and grasping because of this toll. See Symkyn, the miller, in Chaucer's "The Reeves Tale" or Sandyman, in Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" for typical examples.

It was at about this time that news was received from England that James II had been dethroned by William and Mary in the bloodless rebellion of 1688, sometimes called the "Glorious Rebellion." There was a great deal of agitation in the colonies, with some adhering to the old King, who became known as Jacobites. I suspect the Quakers, at least those not dependent on the Governor's patronage, were generally unconcerned.

Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings, The House of Orange
1689-1702 William & Mary

William of Orange and his queen, Mary, the daughter of James II, seized the throne without bloodshed, in part engineered by John Churchill, a forebear of William Churchill. James II fled to the court of France. This became known as the "Glorious Revolution." William was the son of William II, prince of Orange, in the Netherlands, and Mary, was the eldest daughter of King James II of England.

William III led a European alliance that worked ceaselessly, and successfully, to restrict the power of King Louis XIV’s France.

By 1700 the population of England and Wales had grown to 6 million.

Godfrey Hancock of Steetley,, one of John's partners in the grist mill, died late in 1687. Early in 1688 John and his other partner, Thomas Revell, acted as witnesses to a sale of land by Godfrey's widow, Mary.

"24 Jan 1688, Mary Hancock (widow of Godfrey Hancock), of Steetley, Burlington Co., West New Jersey & her daughter Judith Hancock, of same to William Foster, planter, L11.35, 100 acres. Signed Mary Hancock & Judith Hancock. Wit: John Heesom, Thomas Torry, Isaac Hargrave, Robert Butcher & Thomas Revell." - from " West Jersey, New Jersey Deed Records, 1676-1721" by by John David Davis
So, at this point the mill owners were apparently on good terms. The next year, in May 1689, Mary sold off 100 acres for L10, this time to John Tueley. The witnesses, Thomas Torry, Thomas Revell and William Foster, did not include our John. Interestingly, three days later Tueley sold the same property to John Parker Sr. for L12. A John Butcher signed the Concessions and Agreements.

The following record is from the courtbook of Bucks county, Pennsylvania. I can't access the book and there is no preview available, but I have been able to draw out a few lines. The document is dated from 1688 or 1689 and I think, for various reasons, that it is for a period just before the events depicted in the Burlington courtbook, below. It shows that John owed a debt to Richard Ridgway, of Bucks county, Pennsylvania. While it is not absolutely clear, I believe the debt was incurred when John purchased a property from Ridgway, who was a large landowner in Bucks county. I think the debt was resolved through cancellation of the deed for that property. That assumes that John got the deed initially without making full payment.

". . . actions Mary Beakes pit agt [plaintiff against?] Thomas Coverdale deft [debt]
Richard Ridgway pit agt John Heesome deft by the pits ordr withdrawn
withdrawn by the pits ordr a deed of i25 acres of land in fee dated the . . .
. . .
was acknowledged and Delivered by Henry Paxfon grantor to William Plumley grantee a deed of i00 acres of land in fee dated the 10th day of the 12th month 1688
. . .
was acknowledged and delivered by Thomas Coverdale Grantor to Henry Siddall Grantee
Constables appointed for the Succeeding yeare ' the upper part of the River Peter Worral the falls Joseph Chorley . . .
. . .
month 1688 was acknowledged and delivered by William Plumley grantor to Henry Paxson grantee a deed of 3iO acres of land in fee dated the 8th day of the 7th month 1689
was delivered and acknowledged by Richard Noble — grantor to Moses Masley Grantee a deed of mortgage for 3i0 acres of land in . . ."

- from "Records of the Courts of Quarter Sessions and Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 1684-1700," page 204
Alternately, the Google preview of this book may have confused the issue. I may be treating two lines, about separate issues, as one case. This may have been a simple case of debt that was resolved out of court. The 125 acres may be a separate case for another set of men. The name Heesem is listed in the book's index along with Heesome though I haven't been able to find it in the body of the book. Richard Ridgeway was a large landowner, and also the first tavern keeper in Bucks county. His properties were, at this time, near present-day Morrisville, directly across the river from Trenton.

Richard Ridgeway

A native of Berkshire, England, Richard arrived in Burlington, West Jersey, on the JACOB AND MARY, of London, in September 1679. Soon thereafter he crossed the Delaware river and purchased land and established a town near "ye falls of Dellaware," in what became Falls township, Bucks county, Pennsylvania - today's Morrisville on the map to the right.

"None of the early settlers of Pennsylvania and New Jersey was more successful and influential than Richard Ridgway." - from "Genealogy and Descent of Thomas French" by Howard Barclay French
Thomas and Robert Schooley, early settlers of Burlington, had, by 1680, moved there as well. Settlers who had arrived in the MARTHA, WILLING MINDE and SHIELD also settled there. The Quakers amongst them crossed the river to attend services in Burlington. Richard's first wife died in Bucks county.

"Richard Ridgeway, who lived on the river in Falls, opposite Biles' island, was probably the first landlord in the county, being licensed to keep an "ordinary" August 3d, 1686." Ridgeway arrived in the county before 1682. Later of Maidenhead, Burlington county. - from "The History of Bucks County" by William Watts Hart Davis

A very successful speculator, in 1690 Richard purchased 600 acres in Maidenhead, just north of Trenton, New Jersey, moving there with his second wife. He made several more large purchases and trades of land in the coming years. He finally retired to Springfield township, Burlington county, dying there in 1722. - from "Genealogy of the Descendents of Thomas French" by Howard Barclay.

Mary Beakes

The wife of James Hambleton, she was a daughter of Stephen and Elizabeth (Biles) Beakes, both of whom were natives of England, the former born April 28, 1665 . . ." - from "Records of the Courts of Quarter Sessions and Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 1684-1700," page 131. James was a Quaker, of Solebury township, Bucks county.

Thomas Coverdale

Prosecuted and fined 5 shillings for contempt by appearing in court drunk.

Bucks county

The county was one of the original three established by William Penn in 1682. Until broken up in 1752, it extended from Philadelphia county to the New York colony line.

The following paints an unfortunate picture of John Heesom's inability to handle money. Had he over extended himself with the purchase of the mill in 1687 and [maybe] the 125 acres in Bucks county in 1688/9? As to the latter, I suspect if John defaulted he lost any money he had invested. Also note the recurring theme of innholders, that is tavern keepers like Ridgeway above, and acts occurring under the influence of alcohol.

"Court of Common Pleas, held May 8th 1689."
- "Abraham Senior [of Burlington, dyer, innholder. Senior was indeed his last name] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Action - Debt - Withdrawne." pg 100
- "Thomas Revell - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Action - Debt - Withdrawne." pg 100
- this, and most of what follows, is from "The Burlington Court Book: A Record of Quaker Jurisprudence in West New Jersey, 1680-1709"

"Court of Common Pleas, held August 6th 1689."
- "Joan Huff [Mrs. Thomas Brock, see below, innholder] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Action - Debt - Withdrawne." pg 100
I suspect these withdrawn actions were indicative of an out-of-court settlement of debts owed. How did John get himself into such a pass that everyone, including his mill-partner, were dunning him for payment? Can we assume that the charges brought against John were valid? They were, afterall, withdrawn.

Thomas Brock

Thomas Brock was landowner and innholder in Bucks county. He was on record as owning cattle in the county as early as 1684. He was a founder, along with Samuel Oldale, of the town of Bristol, across the river from Burlington. "Next to Richard Ridgeway the earliest recorded petitioner to keep a public house in this county was Thomas Brock. On the 15th of February, 1705, he petioned the court to recommend him to the governor for a license to keep a house of entertainment in Bristol the ensuing year, stating that he had been in the county about twenty years, and had been principally occupied in keeping public house [sic], and that he is "now grown ancient, and is destitute of any other employment."" Thomas Brock was sheriff of the county 1693-5.

Joan Rossell, the widow of Michael Huff, late of the "Ferry House over against Burlington, Innkeeper," married Thomas Brock, innholder, in 1688. Thomas may have obtained the ferry with his marriage.

While John was suffering these problems his partners in the mill sold their shares. Godfrey Hancock's widow sold her share in November 1689.

"12 Nov 1689, Mary Hancock, widow of Godfrey Hancock, and their daughters, Judith & Mary Hancock, all of Burlington, West New Jersey [sold her third interest] to Joshua Newbold, carpenter, of Burlington Co., West New Jersey . . . Thomas Revell and John Hoesam [sic] building mill. Signed, Mary Hancock, Judith (X) Hancock & Mary (X) Hancock. Wit: Abraham Senior, John Smith & John Curtis." - from "West Jersey, New Jersey Deed Records, 1676-1721" by John David Davis
Mary Hancock's deed definitely stated that the six acres had been purchased by Godfrey Hancock, Thomas Revell and John Heesom from Thomas Wright on April 20, 1687, "for mill purposes" - from "Burlington, a Provincial Capital"

And again, slightly different in another reference.

1689 November 12. "Mary Hancock of Steetley, Burlington Co., widow, as executrix of her late husband, Godfrey Hancock, and of her son Godfrey Hancock, both dec'd, Judith and Mary Hancock, her daughters, to Joshua Newbold of Burlington Co., carpenter, for one third of the land bought by said Godfrey Hancock senior with Thomas Revell of Boythorp and John Heeson [sic] of Burlington of Thomas Wright of near Crosswicks Creek April 20, 1687, for mill purposes. 265 1689 Nov. 12. Do." - from "New Jersey Colonial Records, West Jersey Records: Part 4 - Volume 21 Calendar of Records 1664-1703."
Thomas Revell sold his interest to Joshua Newbold on the same day, leaving John Heesom a minority holder against the Newbold's. Thomas got L33 for his share of the land and mill.

John's problems with money continued.

"Court of Common Pleas. held June 3, 1690."
- "William Fryley [a successful carpenter of Burlington whose name is on a number of deeds] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Declaration and bond Read and the bond proved per 2 evidences (vizt) [viz, vizt = videlicet, namely] Christopher Snoden and John Fleckna, both Attested, The Court thereupon Award judgement upon the bond for payment of 12l. [pounds] 13s. [shillings] the principall Debt with dammages and Costs of suite. And execution made out." pg 103

"Court of Common Pleas, held June 5, 1690."
- "Edward Hunloke [a judge of the court and deputy Governor] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Withdrawne." pg 111

"Court of Common Pleas, held August 6, 1690."
- "[Renew Execution] William Fryley - Plaintiff - John Heeson [sic] - Defendant - Execution satisfyed in parte." pg 112
- "John Heeson [sic] - Plaintiff - James Blake - Defendant - Withdrawne." pg 113
Sometime in 1691 John finally decided to sell out his share of the mill.
"March 21th 1690/1691. Att a private Court then held at the House of Richard Bassnett [innholder and Justice of the Peace] in Burlington for the County thereof in West Jersey." pg 122
- ". . .The Sheriffe then made his returne of the warrant of Execution against the Estate of Samuell Oldale for his Fyne of Twenty pounds and Costs and Charges of Court wherein judgment past against him last Court held February 20th last: Upon the said Oldales refusall of payment of the said Fyne and Costs and Charges. Vizt, The Sheriffe hath Seized the Third part of his Mill and of the Land belonging thereto with the Utensills and Appurtenances And hath sold the same by publick proclamation and burning of an Inch of Candle or Auxion the 18th instant to Edward Hunloke for Twenty Eight pounds: Whereupon John Heesom haveing bargained heretofore with the said Samuell Oldale for the said Third parte of said Mill Land and premises, and haveing onely given a Bond to said Oldale for the makeing a Tytle of the same premises: by the appointment and free consent of said Oldale (who alsoe gave and delivered in the said Bond) made and Executed the Deed of Conveyance of said Third parte of Mill Land and premises to the said Edward Hunloke." pg 123
What this appears to mean was that in 1691 John had made a deal to sell his third part of the mill to Samuel Oldale, but that while ownership of the mill had been legally passed, payment for it was only in the form of a bond, or promise, to pay. Remember, Oldale owned the land adjoining the mill. It is not clear whether John got properly paid, but Edward Hunloke ended up with the mill. I suppose that the bond, i.e. mortgage, that Oldale gave to John for the property was paid by Hunloke. That, or the lien that Oldale discharged in trade for the property was honored by Hunloke.

Edward Hunloke quickly sold this property to the Newbolds who became the sole proprietors.

1691 April 14. "Do. Edward Hunloke of Wingerworth, Burlington Co., merchant to Michael Newbold of said Co., yeoman, for one third of the land on Assiscunck or Birch Creek, bo't by Godfrey Hancock, Tho: Revell and John Heesom of Thos: Wright April 20, 1687; also 1/3 of the corn mill on the said land, which thirds grantor bought of said John Heesom March 21 last past." - from "Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State. 1614-1703" by William Nelson, Berthold Fernow

The Men Who Bought John Heesom's Share

Edward Hunloke

A justice of the court, member of the Governor's council, and Deputy Governor of West Jersey from 1688 to 1690 under Dr. Coxe. In 1691 Coxe sold his interest in the province to the West Jersey Society and Hunloke lost his position.

Michael Newbold (1623)

Or Newbould. Michael was a landowner of Woodhouse, the parish of Handsworth, Yorkshire. This is about 4 miles southeast of Sheffield. His wife was Ann Topping. He sent his son, John, with a relative, Godfrey Newbold, onboard the SHIELD to investigate conditions in the New World. John Newbold signed the Concessions and Agreements [for his father?]. In the same year he purchased over 800 acres from the West Jersey proprietors and, in 1680, arrived in Burlington with his wife and 9 of their 11 children. At his death in 1692 he was one of the largest landed proprietors in New Jersey. The inventory of his estate was valued at almost 800 pounds. He was not a Quaker, attending instead the Church of England.

Of Michael's sons, Michael Jr. was the only to leave a male line intact. He served on the traverse jury [a kind of grand jury], and was a justice for Burlington county. Joshua Newbold, who inherited the grist mill, married Hannah Revell, probably the daughter of Thomas Revell.

And John's problems continued . . .

"Court at Burlington, held May 8th 1691."
- "Thomas Brock [innholder] - Plaintiff - Versus - John Heesom - Defendant - Continued. [i.e. from the Joan Huff action, above?]" pg 124

- "Christopher Snoden [yeoman, licensed innholder in Burlington] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant. Jury Attested, declaration read, and Bill obligation for 9l. 14s. 7d. Debt. The defendant declares hee beleeves the Bill was Executed by him, but saith hee was drunk when hee did it. Henry Pope Attested saith hee sawe John Heesom the Defendant seale etc. the Bill, and that to the best of knowledge hee was sober; And as to the 34s. 11d. in the declaration mentioned due per booke, the Plaintiff produced his booke but it makes nothing out, John Fleckna [a friend of John Heesom's? Also attested at the Fryley case] Attested saith that the Defendant and hee the deponent, and others came to the Plaintiffs house and brought Rum with them at their owne charge, And that they drunke the same at the Plaintiffs And the said Plaintiff putt the same Rum to their charge, at the same rate as sold in an ordinary: The Letter of Attorney alsoe Read from the Defendant to the Plaintiff wherein it appeares the Defendant impowered the Plaintiff to Act for him as in the Plaintiffs declaration mentioned. The Jury are agreed of their Verdict, and for for the Plaintiff, vizt, as to the Bill under hand and Seale they find 7l. 14s. 7d. remaining due, As to the 34s. 11d. the booke debt they find nothing thereof due, And as to the Charges paines etc. mentioned in the declaration as Attorney for the defendant they find 4l. 18s. 0d. with 6d. dammages and Costs of suite. Judgment thereupon Awarded." pg 124

"November 3th 1693 Court of Quarterly Sessions"
- "Richard Bassnett [gentleman, justice of the peace, innholder, he arrived in Burlington in 1678] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Action - Case withdrawne." pg 157

"Court of Quarterly Sessions and Pleas held August 8th 1694." pg 167
- "Isaac Marriott [a prominent Quaker merchant, he served in the Assembly] - Plaintiff - Versus - John Heeson - Defendant - Action - Debt Withdrawne." pg 170. By the way, Isaac Marriott's "negro man servant" was convicted of buggering a cow. Just thought you'd want to know.
- "William Righton [a Quaker merchant & mariner, he had a plantation called Bermuda on the Delaware river] - Plaintiff - John Heesom - Defendant - Continued." pg 175
So, John Heesom was brought to court about a dozen times for debt and he brought one man to court for the same. Interestingly, tavern keepers were often associated with John's debt issues. Was this because he ran up large bar bills, or simply because so many men ran taverns?
- Richard Rideway, innholder of Bucks county
- Abraham Senior, innholder of Burlington
- Joan Huff, the wife of Thomas Brock, innholder
- Thomas Brock, innholder of Bucks county
- Christopher Snoden, innholder of Burlington
- Richard Bassnett, innholder of Burlington

I have no further information about John until his death, in 1705. This is, I suppose, a good thing since the Court Book, referenced above, goes through 1709, meaning that John got into no further troubles with the law. It is also true that poor men are rarely taken to court for debt since they cannot pay.

Burlington in 1698

"Burlington is now the chiefest Town in that Countrey, by reason that the late Governor Cox, who bought that Countrey of Edward Billing, encouraged and promoted that Town chiefly, in settling his Agents [Revell] and Deputy-Governors [Hunloke] there, which brings their Assemblies and chief Courts to be kept there; and, by that means it is become a very famous Town, having a delicate great Market-House, where they keep their Market . . . There are kept also in the Famous Town several Fairs every Year . . . There are also two handsom Bridges to come in and out of the Town called London and York-Bridges. The Town stands in an Island, the Tide flowing quite round about it." - from "History" by Gabriel Thomas, 1698.

I think the following could be a mistranscription for our John's name. This survey mentions a John Huson. It would not take much to mistake the double-e of Heesom for the two uprights of the u in Huson, especially if the letters were drawn in a thin and crabbed fashion. The m, of course, was often mistaken for an n. Then Huson=Heeson.
- However, there was a John Hudson, carpenter, living in Wellingburrough, Burlington county. He had land fronting on Northampton river which later became known as Rancocas creek.
- While that appears to kill this conjecture, there was also a place called Easom, circa 1695, "on the Eastside of the South branck of Ancocus [Rancous] Creek, next Tho: Paine." - from "Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State" by William Nelson and Berthold Fernow. Could this have been the site of a homestead of a man named Easom [or Heesom]? This spot was also known as Eshem or Evesham.

"1699-1700 Jan. 30. return of survey by Tho: Gardiner, for Nathaniel Pope, of 545 a. on one of the Southerly branches of Rancocus [Rancocas] Cr. between John Huson and Christopher Weatherill." - from "Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of State. 1614-1703" by William Nelson, Berthold Fernow
- Thomas Gardiner, a Quaker, signed the Concessions and Agreements. He founded the Gardiner family of New Jersey, including Richard Gardiner, commander of the New Jersey Frontier Guard in which John Heesom's grandson, Thomas Hesom, served, below.
- Nathaniel Pope, tailor, of Burlington, West Jersey, was the son of Joseph and Elizabeth Pope. Joseph died in about 1692 and Elizabeth secondly married Christopher Wetherill. Nathaniel died in 1713 and, according to his will, had a personal estate valued at 507 pounds.
- Christopher Weatherill, a tailor of Burlington, had extensive properties in the colony and was a noted Quaker.
"In 1661, Elizabeth Dawson, Elizabeth Brown, Jeremy Burton and Christopher Weatherill were committed to Beverley [East Yorkshire, England] gaol for religious meetings at the house of Thomas Hutchinson, and because they would not promise to refrain from so meeting in future."
Thomas Hutchinson was the brother of George Hutchinson; both were from Yorkshire and came to Burlington in 1678 together in a ship out of London and became proprietors of the colony. Christopher died in 1711.
- Thomas Gardniner, of Burlington, became Nathaniel Pope's trustee upon his mother's death. Thomas was the Treasurer of West Jersey; he died in 1712 with a personal estate valued at almost 1,000 pounds.

The south branch of the Rancocas extends into the Pine Barrens.

Rancocas Creek

The south branch is a tributary of Rancocas creek. It rises in central Burlington county, near Chatsworth, and flows generally northwest, passing through Vincentown, Eayrestown, Lumberton, and Haines port. It meets the north branch just west of Mount Holly. Tributaries, Friendship creek, Stop the Jade Run, Haynes creek, and the southwest branch of the Rancocas, join just north of Leisuretown.

John Heesom, under the surname Heesham, died in 1705.

Name: John Heesham, Date: 08 November 1705, "Administration on the estate of, granted to Margaritt Loveridg [Loveridge], principal creditor." - from the "Calendar of New Jersey Wills," Vol. I, 1670-1730, Part I, page 221
This probably meant that John died intestate and that an adminstrator was appointed by the court. From 1680 it was the general practice to deposit wills, inventories of estates, accounts of executors and administrators, and other papers pertaining to such matters, as well as odd documents, like nuptial agreements and marriage licences, with the Provincial secretaries. An interesting comment on the conditions of the colony was the inclusion of a "muscatoes curtain" and a "musketernett" in many of the inventories.

Margaret Du Mont Loveridge was the widow of William, an innkeeper living in Perth Amboy. Just because William was an innkeeper - and John Heesom had proven he was familiar with the inside of a tavern - does not mean that John's debts were just very large bar bills. William was also a land speculator.

William Loveridge

William Loveridge was from the parish of Wool, in Dorsetshire, England. He died at Perth Amboy, in 1703 - from "Revised History of Harlem: Its Origin and Early Annals" by James Riker. His brother was Samuel Loveridge of New York, a shipwright. William married Margaret Du Mont of Ulster county, New York before 1682. - from "Revised History of Harlem: Its Origin and Early Annals" by James Riker. She was baptized on 28 December 1664.

"1702-3 Feb. 18. Loveridge, William, of Perth Amboy, inn holder; will of. Wife Margaret sole heiress and executrix of real and personal estate. Children--William, Walran, John, Margaret, Temperance, Hannah and Sarah. If the wife should remarry, Samuel Loveridge, Michael Direckson van Veightie and Thomas Gordon to advise her as executrix. Witnesses--Zachariah Weekes, John Barclay, Thomas Gordon. Proved September 15, 1704.
1704 Nov. 1. Inventory of the personal estate (L141.13.4 1/2); made by Miles Forster and George Wilcocks. (In duplicate)" - from "Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey"
"William Loveridge of Perth Amboy, vintner, sole heir and executor of real estate (a bank-lot in Perty Amboy) [of the late Charles Goodman, collector of his majesty's customs] . . . " - from "Calendar of Records in the Office of the Secretary of Sate, 1664-1703" by Berthold Fernow and William Nelson. He was indicted for keeping a disorderly house - from "First Settlers of Ye Plantations of Piscataway and Woodbridge, Olde East New Jersey" by Orra Eugene Monnette.

Perth Amboy is about 40-50 miles northeast of the Burlington-Trenton area. Piscataway is about 7 miles west northwest of Perty Amboy.

John probably had a wife and family, most everyone did in those days, but I know nothing of them. He clearly left them impoverished. While it may only be a common legal term, "principal creditor" implies that there were other creditors and that there was not enough money to discharge all of the debts. In other wills of the period I've seen the wife was left as the administrator. That John's wife was not may mean either that the debts were so great the court simply dumped the estate on the most indebted or that she was illiterate. The courts were not kind to debtors in this era and John's family may have been hounded or even jailed to force them to meet all of his commitments.

John's significance is that he lived in West Jersey, just south of Trenton, where his grandson, Thomas Hesom, was born in about 1720. Many residents of Burlington did move to Trenton as it began to surpass the older town in commercial importance.

Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings
1702-1714 Anne

Sister and heir of Mary and daughter of James II. She died without issue.

In 1704 the Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill, defeated the army of Louis XIV at the battle of Blenheim. His many victories over the French crippled the power of the Sun King in his final years on the throne and restored the balance of power in Europe.


How Our Name Evolved in America

From its first recording in this country, in 1687, through 1745 the family surname was rendered as Heesham, Heesom or Hesom. This was in line with general practice in England prior to 1700. Heesom and Hesom were common throughout England, while Heesham (and Heisham) were found in northern England. The Heysham spelling only became standard after 1700 with the prominence of Robert and William Heysham, wealthy sugar merchants of London, who were also Members of Parliament.

1687-1694 - John Heesom / Heeson - Burlington county court cases
1688/9 - John Heesome - Bucks county court case
1705 - John Heesham - his will
1745 - Thomas Hesom - marriage record (with Catherina Kleyn)
1746 - Thomas Heson - petition

Thomas Hesom's marriage to Catherina Kleyn would introduce a Dutch element into the name, which was the double-s. When an Englishman heard "He-som," he spelled Heesom, Hesom or, later, Heysham (remember, Thomas probably wasn't literate so he couldn't give advise on spelling). When a Dutch man heard "He-som," however, he spelled Hessom or Hissom because there was a Dutch language analog. The village of Hessum, or Hessem, is in Overijssel, in the central Netherlands, and the surnames Hessum and Hessem (sometimes with the Van prefix) are current in that country. Daniel Coste van Hessom was the pseudonym of a Dutch writer in 1738. Hissem-Reifen is a trading company in Utrecht today. So, when Thomas' children were baptized, the Dutch minister, Johannes Fryenmoet, would tend to write their names in the Dutch fashion and the double-s stuck.

1746 - Thomas/John Hisson - son John's birth record (mother: Catherina Kleyn)
1748 - Thomas/Ann Hesson - daughter Ann's birth record (mother: Catherina Kleyn)
1754 - Thomas/William Hisson - son William's birth record (mother: Catherina Kleyn)
1755 - Thomas Hisson - witness to a baptism
1756 - Thomas Heson - milita muster report
1776 - John Hessam/Hesam - New York militia reports
1776 - Thomas/Abner/William Hissom - milita musters throughout 1776

During the Revolution, from 1777, and up to 1800, the family name was often rendered as Heysham or Hysham. This was the name of the more famous Captain William Heysham family of Philadelphia who were related to Robert and William Heysham, above. Though our family was only distantly related to them, if at all, I think the "gravitational pull" of that family's fame as Revolutionary leaders caused our line's name to be altered during this period.

1778 - Thomas Heysham - militia muster
1780 - Thomas Hysham - militia muster
1782 - David/Thomas Hysham - militia muster report
1783 - Thomas Hissam - list of householders in Wyoming valley
1783 - Thomas Heysham - court records
1784 - John/Thomas Hysham - militia muster report
1784 - Thomas Heysham - petition for arms lost
1785 - Thomas/Thomas Jr./John Heysham - Federal tax rolls
1786 - Thomas/Thomas Jr. Hisham - Federal tax rolls
1786-1790 - Thomas Heysham/Hysham - military pay reimbursements
1788 - Thomas/Thomas Jr. Hissom - Federal tax rolls
1788 - Thomas/Elizabeth/James Sullivan Heysham - grandson's baptism
1789 - Thomas Hysham - land survey
1790 - Thomas/Thomas Jr./John Hysham - Federal census
1793 - Thomas/Thomas Jr. Heysham - land survey's
1800 - David Hysham - Federal census (Northampton county, Lower Smithfield township)

Around 1800 the family name drifted back to the Dutch-influenced Hissom, Hissam or Hissem, again with minor variations. In David's family the Heysham name continued in use the longest. Why would this be? My guess is that it had to do with the ages of the brothers. Thomas, born in 1750, was 26 years old when the war began and he used the Hissom spelling in military muster reports throughout 1776 and probably became habituated to its use. I believe this would tend to anchor the use of this spelling and, even if for a short period a different spelling was used, he would tend to return to the spelling he had used so often, so early in life. The eldest brother, John, showed a similar pattern. David, born in 1762, was only 14 when the war began and probably never signed his name using any but the Heysham spelling and so became habituated to it. While the census and tax rolls would record his name as Hissam/Hissem, his own signature and his tombstone were as Heysham.

1800 - John Hissim/Thoms Hissem - Federal census
1810 - John/Thomas Hissem - Federal census
1814 - James Hissam/James Hissom - enlistment papers
1820 - John/Thomas/David Hissem - Federal census
1825 - John/Thomas/David/Jesse/Levi Hissam - Tyler county tax records
1830 - John Hissim - Federal census (Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania)
1830 - David/Thomas Sr./Thomas Jr. Hisam - Federal census (Tyler county, Virginia)
1830 - James Hisum - Federal census (Monroe county, Ohio)
1833 - Jesse Hissam - deed book
1834 - David Heysham - signed declaration for obtaining a pension
1834 - David Heysham - his tombstone
1838 - Jesse Hisham - land survey
1839 - Jesse/Levi Heysham - deed
1845 - Jesse Hissem - deed
1840 - James Hissam/Jesse Hissem/Thomas Heysham - Federal census
1850 - Thomas Heysham/James Hisum/Jesse Hissam - Federal census
1853 - Thomas Heysham [of David] - his tombstone
1853 - Thomas Hissem [of David] - his will
1860 - David/Abner/Francis/James Hisam/Jesse Hissam - Federal census
1870 - Abner Hissam/Frank/James Hissem - Federal census
1880 - Abner Hisam/Frank Hissam/James Hissom - Federal census
1881 - James Hissom - biography

My family, of the David Heysham branch, only began to use the Hissem spelling late in the 19th century when (23) Abner Hissam (1830) consciously made the change circa 1878. The same thing occurred in the Thomas Hissom branch when (24) Joseph A. Hissam (1860) made the change before 1886.


(19) Unknown Heesom (c1687)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650)

My G-G-G-G-G-G-Grandfather. This man would be the missing link between (18) John Heesom of Burlington and (20) Thomas Hesom of Trenton, below. He may have been born in either England or America. His dates of birth may have been anywhere from 1670 to 1700, that is he could have been born to a father who was from 20 to 50 years old at his birth. In turn his son, Thomas Hesom, would have been born to a man between 20 to 50 years old - not unreasonable either. There are no records of land transactions so he was probably a laborer or a carpenter like his father. Was he raised as a Quaker?

He married unknown and at some point before 1720 settled in the village of Trenton, then known as the Falls of the Delaware, on Assunpinck creek, where Thomas was born. It is likely that he had other children, but they also are unknown.

I also don't know when he died, but early in 1756 his son, who had been living in Northampton county, Pennsylvania, is found in the Hunterdon county, New Jersey militia. This was in the immediate aftermath of savage Indian attacks on frontier Pennsylvania and New Jersey that drove most of the settlers south, out of the region. Since Trenton was then in Hunterdon county, is it possible that the young man brought his family back to live with his folks? The old man would have been 56 to 86 years old.

Other Immigrants in West Jersey

Emigres from Long Island, East Jersey and New England came into the West Jersey region starting in the 1690's. They were by religion, Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Church of England.


The Delaware Indians

The regions natives were known to the colonists as the Delaware, and to themselves as the Lenni Lanape. They claimed all the lands from the river to the sea. They were predominantly hunters and fishers, though they grew corn, beans, sweet potatoes and squash, along with tobacco. They lived in wigwams. These were temporary structures that could be easily moved. They were never very numerous and after the arrival of the Europeans, even less so. In 1648 it was estimated they had 2000 warriors, giving them a total population of about 8000. By 1721 there were few left, having been decimated by smallpox and rum. From the journal of a woman who came to America as a young girl, settling in Burlington:

"It may be observed how God’s providence made room for us in a wonderful manner in taking away the Indians. There came a distemper among them so mortal that they could not bury all the dead. Others went away, leaving the town. It was said that the old Indian king spoke prophetically before his death, and said, “the English should increase and the Indians decrease.”


Historical Timeline: Colonial America
1706 Benjamin Franklin born on 17 January in New England.
1720 Colonial population reaches 475,000. Philadelphia is second largest city with a population of 10,000.
1740-1748 King George's War / War of the Austrian Succession involves colonies in conflict with the French and their Indian allies.

Timeline: The Reign of Kings, The House of Hannover
1714-1727 George I

George was the Elector of Hanover and the first of the Hanoverian line of British rulers. He spoke only German. His mother, Sophia, was the granddaughter of King James I of England.

1715 - First Jacobite rebellion. From Jacobus, the Latin name for James, the deposed King James II of England. The Jacobites wanted James II's son, James Francis Edward Stuart, known as the "Old Pretender," to be King. He was a Roman Catholic.

A Heeson Stray in the Delaware Valley

(19) Plunket Heeson (c1700)

His surname is more often rendered as Fleeson, an upholsterer "lately from London and Dublin," circa 1739 - from "Irish Furniture" by James Peill. Other researchers claim he was born in Philadelphia in 1712. He was a shopkeeper and his shop's sign was recorded:

"Easy-Chair, by Plunket Heeson, upholsterer, 1739." - from "Annals of Philadelphia and Pennsylvania: Being a Collection of Memoirs, Anecdotes, and Incidents..." by John F Watson.
His shop was on Chestnut Street, in Philadelphia. He was described as an upholsterer or wallpaperer, circa 1789 per "Wallpaper, Its History, Design and Use" by Phyllis Ackerman. There was also a Plan [Plun?] Heeson in the list of merchants of Philadelphia who subscribed to the Non-Importation Agreement, along with Captain William Heysham.

During the war he made the tent that was used by General Washington at Valley Forge, circa 1778. He was a Justice of the Peace and President of the Court from 1782 to 1785. He died in August 1791.


(20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687)

My G-G-G-G-G-Grandfather. Note that some old English documents refer to the town of Heysham as Hesom. Hesom and Heesom are obvious variants of each other, as are Heesom and Heesam. According to the record of his marriage, Thomas was born in Trenton, New Jersey. I would assume the date to be around 1720 since he was referred to as a “young man.” I'm taking young to mean 20 to 30 years old, or a birth date of 1715 to 1725. There were three denominations active in Trenton at the time when he might have been baptized.

The Chesterfield Meeting of the Society of Friends

The Quakers of Trenton were from the beginning affiliated with the Monthly Meeting in Chesterfield, or Crosswicks as it is now known. This is south of Trenton, between it and Burlington, where John Heesom had lived. The original minute book of this Meeting is preserved at the Trenton Meeting House. The Chesterfield Meeting was settled about the year 1680. A meeting house was built at Chesterfiled in 1693 and replaced by a brick structure in 1707. By 1736 the Meeting had branches at Chesterfield, Springfield, Mansfield, Stony Brook, Bethlehem, Bordentown and Trenton. A meeting house was finally built in Trenton in 1739. The leader of the Trenton Meeting at that time was William Morris, who had come from Barbados and established himself as an importer of West Indian products. A burying ground was also established that became part of the present Riverview cemetary of Trenton.

It is possible that Thomas' parents were Quakers. The movement got its start in northern England and there were a number of adherents in Lancashire. The Quakers settled the Trenton area as early as 1679. I don't, however, see any evidence from Thomas' later life that would indicate a Quaker upbringing. He was certainly not a pacifist.

The Hopewell Episcopalian Church

The Reverend John Talbot, a missionary of the Church of England's Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, had a congregation at Burlington, New Jersey at St. Mary's church, as early as 1702, but also served the people living around the Falls, starting in 1703. Eventually, in about 1705, a church was erected in Hopewell township, just north of Trenton. It was probably a rude affair of log construction. No trace of this church exists today, having been superceded in 1747 by the present St. Michael's church in Trenton. The original church, known as Christ Church, did not have its own minister. The names of the some of the itinerant ministers who conducted services and attended to the pastoral needs of the congregation were gleaned from the records of the S.P.G. They included the Rev. Thoroughgood Moore 1705-07, the Rev. Mr. May before 1714, the Rev. Thomas Holliday 1714-17, the Rev. Robert Walker, the Rev. William Harrison 1721-23 and the Rev. William Lindsay 1735-45. See Schuyler, "A History of St. Michael's Church, Trenton." This implies that the congregation was never large.

All of the baptismal records of the Heysham family in Lancaster are from St. Marys church, which is Church of England, or Episcopalian. The only baptisms recorded for the Heesam family of Yealand Conyers were from St. Oswald's church, also Church of England. Many of the settlers, especially those of Ewing, just north of Trenton, had come from Long Island and Newtown, and would have been Church of England. Note also that not all of the settlers in the Quaker colonies were Quakers.

The Maidenhead, Hopewell & Ewing Presbyterian Churches

The Presbyterian faith in West Jersey got it start from two sources, emigration by the Puritans of New England and Presbyterians out of Scotland and Ireland.

There were four Presbyterian churches in the vicinity of Trenton. The oldest was in Maidenhead township, due north of Trenton, now in the town of Lawrenceville. In Hopewell township, northeast of Trenton, in the village of Carleton, which is now known as Ewing, was another. It was founded in 1708 and its first facility, a log cabin, was built in 1712. This was replaced by a frame structure in 1728. In 1726 congregation members who lived in Trenton village complained about the long walk to Carleton and built their own church. Still part of the Carleton congregation, it was referred to as the 'town' or 'new house' church while the parent church was called the 'country' or 'old house' church. There was another 'daughter' congregation in Hopewell township in what is now the village of Pennington. In 1719 the township was divided in two, the southern half becoming Trenton township. Both the old house and new house churches were in this region. The Pennington church was now the only church in the Hopewell township and became known by the Hopewell name.

Reverend Orr, of Ireland, was the first pastor of these churches, serving them all from 1715 to 1720. He was followed by the Reverend Moses Dickinson from 1720 to 1722. There was no minister for some years until the Reverend Joseph Morgan took over. He served from 1729 to 1737. All of the Trenton area churches were then in the Presbytery of Philadelphia.

By the 1690's the region's Quakers were being joined by settlers from Long Island and East Jersey. These were of English and Scotch ancestry, with a sprinkling of Welsh, Dutch and French Huguenots. Other English families came from Burlington, to the south, and the New England colonies. These included members of both the Church of England and the Presbyterian faiths. The Puritan Congregationalists that settled Massachusetts Bay colony were Presbyterians, but were governed by their 'congregations' instead of a by a ruling group of 'presbyters,' or elders. Note, however, that the Congregationalists, lacking a hierarchy, tended more to doctrinal drift, moving into Arminianism, unitarianism, and transcendentalism. In England the Congregationalists and Presbyterians formed the United Reform Church.

The Baptists

The Baptists, another Reform movement, may have had a congregation in Hopewell as early as 1715, probably meeting in the homes of its members.


Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings
1727-1760 George II

The Seven Years War in Europe, called the French & Indian War in America.

1745 - Second Jacobite rebellion. James II's grandson, Charles Edward Stuart, known as the "Young Pretender" or "Bonnie Prince Charlie", leads an attempt to overthrow Protestant rule.

In 1750 the population of England and Wales has grown to 6.5 million.

Thomas' name was spelled variously throughout his life. He was Thomas Hesom in the record of his marriage in the Smithfield Reformed Dutch Church (RDC) in 1745; as Thomas Heson in a petition of 1746, Thomas Hison in a muster report of 1756, as Thomas Hisson or Hesson in the Walpack RDC church records of three of his childrens’ baptisms, as Thomas Hisham in the 1786 Tax rolls, as Thomas Heysham in the baptismal records of two of his grand-children in 1788, and as Thomas Hysham in the 1790 Federal census. All of these differences may be ascribed to two basic causes, (1) spelling just wasn't that important, nor were rules of spelling established, in the 18th century, and (2) these entries were made, for the most part, by semi-literate clerks and ministers who commonly spelled the names phonetically. As I research his birth, I am looking at almost any two-syllable surname whose first syllable starts with an H, and whose second syllable starts with an S and ends in an M or N.

I do have another theory about the Heysham name. I used to think that my branch of the family were just back-country yokels, simple farmers perhaps too dumb to spell their own names correctly. It was their city cousins, those educated men of business who lived in Philadelphia and in Lancaster, England who spelled it properly. I now think differently. In 1687, when my forefather first showed up in America, I don't think there was a correct way to spell the name; any spelling that phonetically sounded like Hee-shom was "good enough." It was only around 1700, after John Heesom had emigrated, that the spelling in England began to standardize around Heysham. Why would that happen? I think it was because it was around that time that a branch of the family that normally spelled their name that way became famous as rich merchants and members of Parliament. All other spellings, including that for the town of Heysham, tended to codify around this now well-known version. When people thought Hee-shom, they spelled Heysham. In America, outside the sphere of influence of this branch of the family, the name progressed from Heesom through the variants mentioned above. However, at the time of the Revolution it was, for a short time, spelled more often like Heysham. Why was that? I think it was because it was around that time that a branch of the family, cousins of the famous Heysham's above, became famous in Philadelphia as patriots. When my family moved west, away from that sphere of influence, the spelling drifted away again.

I'm not sure who Thomas' parents were, but at some point they left Burlington, New Jersey, where Thomas' grandfather, John Heesom, had originally settled, and settled just a little further north, in Trenton.

Trenton, New Jersey

The Delaware river divides Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and stretches on into New York. The river basin had first been settled by colonists from the Netherlands and Sweden. The Dutch settled to the north and on the eastern shore of the Delaware [which they knew as the South river], spreading out from their colony in New Amsterdam [on the North river, or Hudson]. The Swedes settled to the south along the mouth of the Delaware. The area of Trenton, however, was settled late, starting in the late 1670's after England had exerted her dominance and forced the Dutch and Swedish colony's to swear allegiance to the British King. Under English control the area, first known as Nova Caesarea, was divided by its proprietors into East & West Jersey. West Jersey was settled by the Quakers, who began to arrive before their famous settlement of Pennsylvania.

Old Trenton was located at the northern bank of the Assunpink creek where it joined the Delaware river. This marked the river's fall line. While the town was originally called the 'Falls of the Delaware,' there is no actual waterfall, just a stretch of shallow, rocky water that denies passage further up the river to deep draft ships. The fall line is a classic 'break in transport' point where one mode of transportation, such as ocean-going ships, must transfer their cargo to another, either barges or mule trains in this case. It creates ideal conditions for the establishment of a city.

The first permanent settlement at the falls was that of Mahlon Stacy and other Quakers [none of whose names are known] in 1679. The Stacy party, who were from Yorkshire, sailed aboard the SHIELD from Hull and landed at Burlington in December 1678. Many of these colonists were named, but the list also includes many unnamed servants who probably later moved out on their own. [One of the SHIELD's passengers who was named was John Heyres. I'd love to think this is a misprint for Heysham] The Stacy party then moved north to the Assunpink creek to take up their claim. Mahlon Stacy appears to have laid out his lands as a manor with tenements, which were occuppied by renters, clustered close together for mutual protection. From the "Journal of a Voyage," by two Dutchmen who passed through the nascent town in 1679:

"Resuming our route, we arrived at the falls of the South river about sundown, passing a creek where a new grist-mill was erected by the quakers, who live hereabouts in great numbers, and daily increase. But it seems to us as if this mill could not stand long, especially if the flow of water were heavy, because the work was not well arranged. We rode over here, and went directly to the house of the person who had constructed it, who was a quaker, where we dismounted, and willingly dismissed our horses. The house was very small, and from the incivility of the inmates and the unfitness of the place, we expected poor lodgings. As it was still daylight, and we had heard so much of the falls of the South river, or, at least, we ourselves had imagined it, that we went back to the river, in order to look at them; but we discovered we had deceived ourselves in our ideas. We had supposed it was a place where the water came tumbling down in great quantity and force from a great height above, over a rock into an abyss, as the word falls would seem to imply, and as we had heard and read of the falls of the North river, and other rivers. But these falls of the South river are nothing more than a place of about two English miles in length, or not so much, where the river is full of stones, almost across it, which are not very large, but in consequence of the shallowness, the water runs rapidly and breaks against them, causing some noise, but not very much, which place, if it were necessary, could be made navigable on one side. As no Europeans live above the falls, they may so remain. This miller’s house is the highest up the river, hitherto inhabited. Here we had to lodge; and although we were too tired to eat, we had to remain sitting upright the whole night, not being able to find room enough to lie upon the ground. We had a fire, however, but the dwellings are so wretchedly constructed, that if you are not so close to the fire as almost to burn yourself, you cannot keep warm, for the wind blows through them everywhere. Most of the English, and many others, have their houses made of nothing but clapboards, as they call them there, in this manner: they first make a wooden frame, the same as they do in Westphalia, and at Altona, but not so strong; they then split the board of clapwood, so that they are like cooper’s pipe staves, except they are not bent. These are made very thin, with a large knife, so that the thickest end is about a pinck (little finger) thick, and the other is made sharp, like the edge of a knife. They are about five or six feet long, and are nailed on the outside of the frame, with the ends lapped over each other. They are not usually laid so close together, as to prevent you from sticking a finger between them, in consequence either of their not being well joined, or the boards being crooked. When it is cold and windy the best people plaster them with clay. Such are most all the English houses in the country, except those they have which were built by people of other nations. Now this house was new and airy; and as the night was very windy from the north, and extremely cold with clear moonshine, I will not readily forget it. Ephraim and his wife obtained a bed; but we passed through the night without sleeping much. "

Mahlon Stacy died in 1704. In 1714 Mahlon Stacy Jr. was bought out by William Trent and by 1719 the area was being called Trent’s town or Trenton, perhaps because the original name was such a mouthful. At the time of Thomas Hesom’s birth it was still a very small village, containing perhaps fewer than fifty houses, but large enough in relation to the rest of the colony to have been recently made the seat of the royal courts. In 1719 William Trent built a fine house which he named Bloomsbury Court. It passed through several owners, including a Dr. John Cox [Uncle of Francis Bowes Sayre, a son-in-law of William Heysham of Philadelphia]. This fine old house was the scene of many social gatherings in Colonial days and afterwards. It is said that, “General Washington and his lady enjoyed the hospitality of Bloomsbury Court, and the Marquis de La Fayette, Rochambeau, and other noted Frenchmen, were entertained there.” The home still stands today.

It is not clear whether Thomas Hesom actually grew up in Trenton, nor do I know what became of his parents, but they were probably farmers, as were most of the early settlers in New Jersey. They were not listed among the large stake-holders in the colony so they may have been tenant farmers or farm laborers, working the land of one of the large landowners, like Mahlon Stacy.

At some point prior to 1745 a young Thomas Hesom, he was probably only 18 to 20 years old at the time, decided to strike out on his own and moved north up the Delaware river. Pennsylvania had the reputation as "the best poor man's country;" the land was cheap and plentiful, taxes were low, and no state church hounded religious dissenters.

Thomas may have poled a raft against the current of the river or, more likely, hiked up one of the Indian trails that meandered through the dense forests. He arrived in Lower Smithfield township, in Northampton county, on the Pennsylvania side of the Delaware river. The area north of the Blue Mountains had just been opened up to general settlement starting in 1737, though the local Indians did not vacate the area until 1742. At left is a photograph of the Delaware river on the route to Smithfield. During the 18th century the entire area was thickly forested.



As travelors went north on the river they entered the Delaware Water Gap, right, a region of high cliffs where the river cuts through the Kittatinny, or Blue Mountains. These mountains extend diagonally, from the northeast to the southwest. If Thomas had hiked north, he would have passed through the Wind Gap, a pass in the mountains not far to the west of the Water Gap.

Immediately past the gap, as the Delaware river turns to the right, a large stream, the Broadhead [Brodhead] creek, opens to the left. It flows out of the northwest, then loops back southwest, then west again as it meets the Pocono creek coming out of the southwest. It was here, at the joining of the two creeks, that Jacob Stroud later settled and built his stockaded home which became the present-day town of Stroudsburg. Thomas settled some miles up Broadheed creek.









Northampton county, Pennsylvania

Smithfield township was originally in Buck’s county, but due to the breakup of large counties and the shifting of county borders, it was successively part of Northampton county, starting in 1752, and of Monroe county, starting in 1853.


Buc = Bucks county, Nhm = Northampton

Northampton county was split, diagonally, by the Blue mountains, today known as the Kittatinny Range. To the south was the rich Lehigh valley. To the north the sparsely populated land was cut by a succession of ridges and narrow valleys.

The settlement of this section of Pennsylvania was controversial. In 1686 William Penn, the colonies proprietor, had agreed to buy land in what became Bucks county from the Indians "as far as a man could walk in one and a half days." The Indians understood this to mean about thirty miles. Penn’s sons, however, trained two athletes in 1737 to walk at a record clip, cleared brush from their path, had horses to carry their supplies and provided transportation for them at river crossings. In the end the “Walking Purchase” was doubled in size by this ruse. Feeling cheated, the Indians refused to leave. It was only in 1742 that the Iroquois, the overlords of the local tribes, were convinced, or perhaps bribed, to force their clients to move. However, the Quaker peace with the Indians was destroyed and the settlers were to suffer from Indian attacks during the years to come.

The first white settlers north of the Blue Mountains had been Dutch and Huguenots out of New York and New Jersey in Mininsinck in the 1720's. They were followed in Northampton county by Scotch-Irish Presbyterians who settled Allen, Washington and Mount Bethel townships in the latter part of the decade. These were followed by the Germans in Milford, Macungie and Saucon townships - by the end of the century Northampton was a German colony. Amongst the mainly Lutheran Germans were Mennonists, Dunkers, Schwenckfelders, Reformers and Amish. Finally, the Moravians arrived beginning in 1740.

For an excellent history of the county, see History of Northampton County.

Did Thomas Hesom buy land in the "Walking Purchase" from the Pennsylvania proprietors before he left Trenton? If so there may still be records of the purchase. William Allen, a land agent, was a principal in the "Walking Purchase." Another land agent who specialized in the region north of the Blue Mountains was Robert Levers, of Lower Smithfield. The early Dutch and Huguenot settlers, such as the De Pui's, had been forced to repurchase the land they had lived on since 1725.

Lower Smithfield Township

One of the earliest settlements in the "Walking Purchase," north of the Blue Mountains, otherwise known as the Kittatinny Range, was Lower Smithfield township, just west of the Delaware river on Brodhead creek. While southeastern Pennsylvania, around the city of Philadelphia, was heavily Quaker, northeastern Pennsylvania was dominated by the Dutch, who spread out from their Hudson river valley colony of New Amsterdam, across the northern New Jersey county of Sussex, and into Bucks county. Later Moravian Germans entered the region in great numbers so that the "Pennsylvania Dutch" dialect became as frequently heard as English.

Brodhead creek, which flows through the center of the township, was originally named the Analomink. This creek and its watershed were famous for brook trout when the Minnisink tribes camped and fished on these waters.

Peter LeBar was the first white settler to build a home in the area. His log house was built in 1730. Daniel Brodhead, whose family had come to the New York colony in the reign of Charles II, negotiated with the heirs of William Penn for a large plantation tract in 1734 and settled in the lower area of the Analomink, soon to be renamed Brodhead Creek in his honor. His Dansbury Mission, erected for use by Moravian missionaries, was attacked and destroyed by local Indians in 1755 during the opening phases of the French & Indian War. Fort Hamilton, a wooden stockade, was built in response in 1756, part of a line of forts built by the colonial government, but it fell into decay after the war. In 1760 Jacob Stroub settled there and built a large stone house. He built a stockade around it in 1776 and named it Fort Penn. His son, Daniel, founded the town of Stroudsburg.

"...Lower Smithfield, on the Delaware, above the present village of Stroudsburg, had but a few clearings opened in 1751, occupied by Charles Broadhead, Samuel Dupue, John McMichael, John Carmeckle, John Anderson, James Tidd, Job Bakehoren, and Henry Dysert. The were held under proprietory auspices." - from "History of the Lackawanna Valley" by Horace Hollister, 1869
Roads from Bethlehem and Easton in the south were established in the 1750's to join the area forts together, but there had been Indian trails through the mountains long before the white man came. These included the 'Wind Gap' pass at Fort Penn.
"The Wind-gap, unlike the far-famed Water-gap in the same cluster of mountains, is a deep depression of the summit of the range, is quite level on both sides of the road for a considerable distance, and exhibits none of the majestic precipices of the latter. The earth is covered with masses of angular rocks, among which shoot up cedar and other trees and shrubs, chiefly of the coniferæ order; but the road, by industry, is made quite smooth. The hills rise on each side of the Gap to an altitude of eight hundred feet, clothed and crowned with trees. It was through this pass in the mountains that two expert walkers crossed to a spur of the Pocono when measuring the extent of a district of country northwest of the Delaware, for the proprietors of Pennsylvania, in 1737 . . . The turnpike road through the Wind-gap, and across the valleys and mountains, to Wilkesbarre, was made by [General] Sullivan for the passage of his troops in 1779, when marching to join General Clinton on the Tioga [this was the Sullivan campaign in revenge for the Wyoming massacre]. Before that time the pass was little more than a rough Indian war-path, and its obscurity made the hurried flight of the people from Wyoming over the solitary region more perplexing and dreadful than it would be now." - from Lossing's "Field Book of the Revolution"
Trails also existed along the valley creeks. Dupui, an early settler, spoke of using the frozen Delaware river as a road into New Jersey. On the east side of the Delaware an old mining road paralleled the river up into New York.

Much of the previous information came from the site Search for the Parents of the North Carolina Helms Brothers.

I suspect Thomas arrived in Smithfield a couple of years prior to his wedding, say in 1743. This would be just after the Delaware Indians finally quit the area, ordered out by the Iroquois, and would allow him time to build up a farm and the assets sufficient to support a wife. Farmsteads tended to be scattered along rivers and streams, about half a mile apart. Population density in Northampton county averaged fewer than twenty people per square mile.

A man had to move carefully in courting a woman. Custom dictated that he request the father's approval before he approached the woman. Intermediaries were often used to help determine if the woman would accept the man's approaches before he made that awesome step. Any father would want to know that his daughter would be well cared for, so he ascertained whether his prospective son-in-law was of good moral character and could support the girl. Dad also didn't want his daughter coming back home later with grandchildren in tow for him to support. If the suitor proceeded without the father's approval he could be brought to court by the parents for stealing the affections of their daughter. Watch the move "The Quiet Man" for some aspects of this circumspect ritual.

A Dutch bride would be domestic and self-effacing, thrifty in managing households and eager to raise a large family. If possible, the Dutch in America preferred to marry within their own church and ethnic group. This may say something about the Kleyn's social position.

On 3 February 1745 the banns were read and on 24 February Thomas Hesom, "a young man," married Catherina Kleyn, "a young woman," in the Reformed Dutch Church of Smithfield township, Bucks county, Pennsylvania. She was born in Smithfield, but both were dwelling there at the time of their marriage.

The terms young man and young woman, usually listed in their Dutch abbreviations, j.m. & j.d. [junge mensch und junge dochter - young man and young daughter], were common phrases in RDC registers and meant "not previously married." Banns were a custom of the RDC and had to be registered three Sundays before the marriage was to take place. This announcement was made from the pulpit in the presence of the congregation and well as in the church register.

A Dutch Wedding

The great majority of Dutch Americans married relatively young, before the age of twenty-five, and they tended to marry within their own ethnic and religious group. Their weddings were affirmations of the extended Dutch American family.

Before the wedding day the bride and groom's parents would host a party. The guests would bless the couple and wish them happiness. The bribal shower we know today originated in the Netherlands. If a Dutch bride did not have her father's blessing for the wedding, her friends would "shower" her with gifts to help compensate for the lack of a dowry.

As soon as an engagement was made public, the banns were announced in church for three successive Sundays, and the marriage was celebrated with dispatch. This was usually done on a Sunday amid the whole congregation as part of public worship and as a communal blessing of the union. However, the Reformed church distrusted ceremony and the church service was used for teaching and exhortation rather than for show. The Calvinist doctrine believed that sin was everywhere and that sorrow was unavoidable. The marriage liturgy began,

"Married persons are generally, by Reason of Sin, subject to many Troubles and Afflictions."
but quickly reminded the couple that you "may be assured in your Hearts of the certain Assistance of God in your Afflictions." The ceremony that followed described the duties of the husband and wife toward each other, toward their community, and toward God. Three vows are given, the weddings vows of husband to wife, and wife to husband that we are familiar with, but also the couple's vow to God. The couple then joined hands as the symbol of their union.

The Dutch ceremony was not an exchange of property between father-in-law and groom; the father of the bride did not give away the bride. Dutch women enjoyed stronger inheritance rights and a more elevated status than their English peers. In cases of Dutch-English intermarriage, the couples usually ended up Dutch Reformed.

After the wedding there was a communal feast which was, in its excess and boisterousness, decidedly un-Calvinist.

The marriage service was performed by Reverend Johan Caspar Freynmuth. An excellent resource for area birth, death and marriage information is My Raub Ancestry.

The Kleyn Family

The name Kleyn is a form of klein, a nickname for a small man - Hugh Barents de Kleyn of New Amsterdam, for instance. Also, as Klein, Kline, Klyn, Klyne, de Kleyn, Kleyne and Cline.

The family may be either Dutch or German. An Ulderick Kleyn [Cleen], born in Staden, Hesse, in Germany, came to New York in 1640 as a soldier. On 28 July 1641 "Ulderick Cleen, jm Uyt Hessen" and "Aefje Pieters, jd van Amsterdam" were married in the New Amsterdam RDC. They moved to the Dutch community of Albany after 1642.

The following are the Kleyn's of Smithfield that I've identified so far. We know that Anna Kleyn was the daughter of Johannis Kleyn and Elsjen Leydekker of Kingston, Ulster county, New York. I tie Anna to Johannis and our Catherina as siblings through the Smithfield RDC and their shared witnessing duties. Margriet Kleyn may have been another sister because she too ended up in Smithfield having children in the mid 1740's, though that is a bit more tenuous. Kleyn’s, Klein’s, Kline’s, and Cline’s continued to live in Smithfield for another hundred years.



(18) Joa: Jacob Kleyn (c1678)

Joa: equal Johann. He could be the father of Johannis, below, if we push his date of birth back a bit. Otherwise he may have been an older brother or uncle.

"Perhaps this family [Thomas Hesson] belongs with Johann Jacob Klein and his descendents." - from "The Palatine families of New York" by Henry Z. Jones and Hank Jones
Johann was born in about 1678 in Kingston, Ulster county, New York. He married Anna Orsela Keyser in about 1703 in New Hurley, Ulster county, New York. She was the daughter of Dirck Corneliszen Keysler and Agniet Jacobsen Coens, born in about 1682 in Kingston. Their children were,
(19) Jacob Kleyn (1704), born in Hurley, Ulster county, he married first Margriet Stokraad and next Cornelia Sluyter, of Hurley, on 28 January 1733 in Kingston. He was still living in Kingston in 1733.
(19) Anna Margriet Kleyn (1713), baptized on 1 March 1713 & witnessed by Willem Stokkeraat [father-in-law of Jacob Jr.?] and Anna-Margriet. "Reys Thomas, jm, of England, liv Poughkeepsie" married "Margriet Kleyn, liv Rosendale" in the Kingston RDC on 1 June 1733.
(19) Elisabeth Kleyn, perhaps. She married Niclaas Brandauw

(19) Johannes Kleyn (1690)
(18) ?? Kleyn

Johannes was born in about 1690 in Ulster county, New York. He first married Elsjen Leydekker. Elsjen was born in about 1695 and died before 1728. Johannes second married Angenietjen Bosch [Bush], both of New Marbletown, on 11 February 1728 in the Kingston RDC - from "Baptismal and Marriage Registers of the Old Dutch Church of Kingston" by Estelle Stewart J. King and Roswell Randall Hoes. Note that Thomas Hesom and Catherina Kleyn were witnesses at the baptism of Johannes Bosch and Mary Johnson's daughter in 1755. Dies this indicate a family relationship? Johannes children were,
(20) Anne 'Antje' Magdalena Kleyn (1714)
(20) Margriet Kleyn (c1715), perhaps
(20) Johannes Kleyn (c1720?), perhaps
(20) Catherina Kleyn (c1720), perhaps

(20) Anne 'Antje' Magdalena Kleyn (1714)
(19) Johannes Kleyn (1690)

Anna Magdalena, the daughter of Johannes Kleyn and Elsjen Leydekker, was baptized on 26 September 1714 in the Kingston RDC, Ulster county, New York. Witnesses were Harmen Bietser and Anna Magdalena [no surname given].

Anne married Thomas Brink [Brinck] in about 1740. Thomas Brink's first wife was Francis Schoonhoven and his second was Anne 'Antje' Kleyn, who I believe was Catherina Kleyn's sister. Thomas had originally come from New Marbletown, Ulster county, the grandson of of Lambert Huybertsen Brink, through his eldest son, Huybert Lambertsen Brink (see the Brink Family, below). Anna was his second wife.

Though Thomas Brink was of the generation before Thomas Hesom and Catherina Kleyn, I believe Catherina and Anne were sisters, mainly because they were having children at about the same time.
- 18 July 1741 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn baptized their daughter, Rachel, at the Walpack RDC.
- In 1744 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn baptized their daughter, Sara, in front of witnesses Dirck Van Vliet and Rachel van Keuren, syn H. vr. at the Walpack RDC.
- In 1746 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn baptized another daughter, Jenneke, in front of witnesses Alexander Thomson and Arriaentje De Long syn Huys vr. at the Walpack RDC.
- In 1746 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn, syn Huys vr. were witnesses at the baptism of John, the son of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn at the Walpack RDC.
- In 1748 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn baptized their son, Johannes, in front of witnesses Johannes Kleyn and Catherina Kleyn at the Walpack RDC.
- In 1752 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn were witnesses at the baptism of Thomas, the son of Niclaes Brinck and Catherina Decker at the Walpack RDC.
- 4 February 1752 they baptized their son, Thomas, in front of witnesses Thomas Swartwout and Jenneke Swartwout at the Walpack RDC. Note that Thomas Brink's mother was a Swartwout. - from "The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record."

(20) Margriet Kleyn (c1715)
(19) Johannes Kleyn (1690)

She was born in Esopus, Ulster county, New York. Margriet first married Benjamin Eekerli [Ekele]. Their son Benjamin was baptized in the Kingston RDC on 4 September 1743, no witnesses named. Benjamin Sr. died and Margriet then married Jan [John] Gerritsz Decker, widower of Barbara DeWitt, on 8 November 1747 at the Lower Smithfield RDC. This was two years after Catherina Kleyn's Smithfield marriage to Thomas Hesom. Margaret was John's second wife. John had been born in Kingston, Ulster county, New York in 1688.
- 31 December 1749 Margriet and John were witnesses to the baptism of James McGomery at Lower Smithfield RDC.

(20) Johannes Kleyn (c1720?)
(19) Johannes Kleyn (1690) ??

He probably married Eva Brink.
- In 1754 Johannes Kleyn and Eva Brink were witnesses at the baptism of William, the son of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn.

(20) Catherina Kleyn (c1720)
(19) Johannes Kleyn (1690) ??

She married Thomas Hesom in 1745 at the Lower Smithfield RDC.
- In 1746 Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn, syn Huys vr. were witnesses at the baptism of John, the son of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn.
- In 1748 Dirk Kermer and Jacomyntje Keyser, syn Huys vr. were witnesses at the baptism of Ann, the daughter of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn. The Keyser's may have been relations of the Kleyn's.
- In 1754 Johannes Kleyn and Eva Brink were witnesses at the baptism of William, the son of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn.

I group Anna, Johannes and Catherina as children of Johannes since it was common for siblings, or parents, to act as witnesses.

Why were Thomas and Catherina married in the Dutch Church? The Kleyn family was Dutch and this was undoubtedly their church. It may also indicate that Thomas was a Presbyterian/Calvinist. The Presbyterian and Reformed Dutch Churches were both part of the Reformed church movement. They were organizationally independent, but shared the Calvinist doctrine, the RDC rigidly so. Where churches were few, Presbyterians, Reformed Dutch, Reformed German, Huguenots and Congregationalist adherents, all Calvinists, would use the same facility. If Thomas' parents were Presbyterian or Puritan, and raised their son as such, this would help explain why he was married and had his children baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church. The alternative theory is that it was his wife's church and/or it was the only church available. Note also that Lancashire was a bastion of Puritanism [especially the village of Bolton to the south of Lancaster], as it was of many anti-Anglican sects, and Scotland, so close to Lancashire, was the home of Presbyterianism, known there as the Church of Scotland.

The Dutch Reformed Church

Four Dutch Reformed Churches in the Minisink were organized in the Delaware river valley in 1737 by the Reverend George Wilhelmus Mancius [Mansius] of Kingston, New York. They were,

The Mahackemeck church in the town of Deerpark, formerly known as Minisink, in Orange county, New York, at the northern end of the Minisink valley. It was about half a mile south of Port Jervis, near the junction of the Neversink and Delaware Rivers. It was burnt during the Revolutionary war. The present church is known as “The Reformed Dutch Church of Deerpark."

The Minisink church, pronounced Minnising by the Dutch, was eight miles south east of the Mahackemeck church in the present-day Montague township, Sussex county, New Jersey.

The Walpack [Walpeck, Waulpeck] church was also in Sussex county, New Jersey, about fifteen miles south of the Minisink Church.

The Smithfield church was about eight miles from the Walpack Church, in Northampton county, Pennsylvania, across the Delaware river. It is now known as the Shawnee Presbyterian church. In 1750 William Allen, a land agent and principal in the "Walking Purchase" fraud, granted five acres in Shawnee for use as a "Presbyterian Meeting House." Two years later, in 1752, a new church was built with native stone under the direction of Nicholas and Samuel Depui, and Abraham Van Campen. It was dubbed the "Stone church." This was about two miles away from the original log church. The rebuilding was probably an endevour in which all the members of the church, including the Heysham's, lended a hand. It was used by Presbyterians, Dutch Reformists and Lutherans - from "The Decker Journal" of October 1980. Today the site is still occupied by the Shawnee Presbyterian Church, rebuilt in the 1850's. For more information see History of Orange County.

The sermons at Reformed Dutch churches were notorious for their length, and the dreadful seriousness of their parson's delivery.

The Reverend Johannes Casparus Fryenmouth

In 1741 the first regular pastor was Johannes Casparus Fryenmouth. He serviced all four congregations from his parsonage at Nomanock, near Minisinck village, in Sussex county, New Jersey. The first 20 baptisms at the church, from 1741 to 1744, were judged by the Classis of Amsterdam to have been unlawfully done. Those beginning in December 1744 were marked as "By me, Joh. C. Fryenmuth, beginning the lawful service."

Also as Fryenmoet or Freynmuth. Johannes was born in Switzerland in about 1720 and emigrated to America circa 1740. He married Magdalena Helena Van Etten on 23 July 1742 at the church in Port Jervis. By the way, Magdalena's sister, Jannetje Van Etten, married Manuel Gonsalus who was associated with Thomas Hesom's family, below. Reverend Fryenmouth performed the marriage of Thomas Hesom and Catherina Kleyn, and baptized their children John, William and Anne.

"He [Fryenmouth] was very popular as a preacher. So great was his popularity that quite a strife occurred between certain churches which wished his services. The churches of the Delaware and of Ulster county were the contestants. A correspondence took place between them of a very spicy nature, and evincing no little spirit of rivalty as to wealth and worldly standing . . . In 1756 an Indian massacre compelled him [Fryenmouth] to flee from his home, and he went to Raritan . . ." - from "A Manual of the Reformed Church in America"
Reverend Fryenmouth's last baptism at Smithfield was dated 22 September 1755. Johannes became pastor of the Claverack and Kinderhook churches, in New York in October 1756. He quit the Claverack church in 1770, but continued to minister at the Kinderhook church until his death in 1778.

The Reverend Johannes Henricus Goetschius

Though never listed as the minister of this church, he preached and gave baptisms in Smithfield from 12 February 1758 to 26 November 1759. "He was below the middle size, of a vigorous constitution, abrupt in speech, but his language was clear and expressive. He was a man of much erudition, a thorough Calvinist, and an accomplished theologian." Other sources more bluntly call him a man of violent passions who once wore a sword into the church anticipating a violent reaction to his sermon. He was pastor of the Church of Hackensack from 1749 until his death in 1774. He also taught at Queens, now Rutgers, College.

The Reverend Thomas Romeyn

After the treaties of Tadeuskund ended the Minisinck war in 1758, a new pastor, the Reverend Thomas Romeyn [Romain, Romien], was installed. "The Colonial Clergy of the Middle Colonies" by Frederick Lewis Weis says that Thomas was in the Minisinck in 1760 and his first baptism was given on 15 April 1760.

The Romeyn family had emigrated from Rotterdam in about 1661. Thomas was born at Pompton, New Jersey on 2 March 1729. He studied theology and graduated from the College of New Jersey in 1750. He was ordained in the Reformed Dutch Church in Holland in 1752. He initially preached in Long Island, then moved to the Minisinck, where he served from 1760 to 1770, his last baptism being given in October 1770. Thomas moved to the Fonda church in 1771. He died on 22 October 1794 at Fonda, New York.

The Reverend Elias Van Benschooten

Or Van Bunshoten. After Thomas Romeyn's departure in 1771 the churches of the Minisinck were unserved until the Reverend Van Benschooten [Benschoten] arrived in the fall of 1785, a period of fifteen years. He continued his services until 1795. One half of his services were in Dutch, the other in English. It was he that baptized Thomas Hesom's grandchildren, James Heysham Sullivan and Joab Heysham.

As early as November 1745 Thomas and Catherine's first child, Mary, or Molly, was born. A frontier woman could expect to be pregnant or nursing from the time of her marriage until the menopause. First wives often did not live that long.

I suspect that Thomas' household was bilingual, the children favoring the Dutch, or German, of their mother and of most of the community over the English of their father. The sermons they heard in the church were most often given in Dutch as well. With the large German and Moravian population then moving into Northampton county the children may have also picked up many words or phrases from those languages.

The first attempt to organize Smithfield township administratively was in 1746. In June the inhabitants petitioned for a township

"to begin at the gap in the [Blue] mountains where the river Delaware runs through, and from thence five or six miles, a north and by west course, and from thence to the north corner of Christoffel Denmark's plantation, and from thence with a straight line to the river Delaware, and thence the several courses thereof to place of beginning."
The following names were signed to the petition [including]:
"Bernard Stroud . . . James Hyndshaw . . . Nicholas De Pui, Daniel De Pui . . . Aaron De Pui . . . Redolphus Schoonover . . . John Houay . . . Thomas Heson." - From "The History of Bucks County, Pennsylvania," CHAPTER XXXVII, by W. W. H. Davis, 1905.
Some of these surnames would be important in the county for decades to come. This petition appears to have been rejected, or ignored, because similar requests were forwarded in 1748 and 1750. I don't have a complete list of the signers of those petitions.

John Houay

John Howey, c1715-c1782, immigrated from Ireland and was in Smithfield, Bucks county, Pennsylvania as early as 1738. In 1744 he had land "at the Round Meadow near the Bush Kiln [river]." His son, John, was baptized in 1745 in the Walpack RDC while his son Boudewyn was baptized in the Smithfield church in 1749. His homestead on the Big Bushkill river was burned during the Indian raids of 1755 and he fled south, living in Hunterdon and Gloucester county, New Jersey for a time. At one point he owned the land next to Thomas Hessom of Smithfield. Also as Howay, Houwy, Hooey, and Howeyus.

More than one creek is named Bushkill. The waterway of concern to us is the Big Bushkill. The Little Bushkill creek empties into the Big Bushkill which then flows into the Delaware river near the village of Bushkill, at Wallpack Bend.

In the fall of 1746 a son, John, was born and christened in the Reformed Dutch church in Walpack, Sussex county, New Jersey. His parents were Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn. Witnesses were Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn syn Huys vr. Antje, or Anne, was Catherina's sister. The family probably gathered in Walpack for the christening dinner.

A Dutch Christening Celebration

The arrival of a new baby was an event of great happiness in the Dutch household. There were varying customs following the birth of the child, particularly the customs involving the baptism of the child and the celebration which ensued. According to the resolutions of the church, the child had to be baptized as soon as possible after birth, this usually meant about a week later, or when the mother was able to attend.

For the baptism, the child was dressed in a christening robe which was as costly as the parents' means would allow. The child's bonnet showed whether the child was a boy or a girl - six plaits for a boy and three for a girl. Once the baby was dressed, neighbors and friends were invited to come and visit, and light refreshments were offered. Then the christening-party started for the church.

The father had to be present at the baptism, and it was left to him to bring brothers or sisters as witnesses, provided these were members of the Reformed Church and did not stand under "censure" or excommunication.

Once the christening-party returned from church, the child was blessed by the father, and dressed in another outfit, called a presentation robe, to be presented to the friends and relatives who were invited to the christening dinner.

In the meantime, the berkemeyer, or large glass goblet with a cover, filled with sugared Rhine wine, or the silver brandy bowl, was passed around. The christening dinner was a very costly and elaborate affair and differed little from the wedding feast. During the dinner, the child was again presented to the guests, when songs were sung and speeches and toasts were made. Among these delicacies were the suikerdelbol gaan, or sugared roll, kraamvetjes, cakes made hollow and filled with sugar. Aniseeds covered with a coating of white sugar, rough for boys and smooth for girls, were also served. The kandeel pot, caudle cup or cinnamon cup, was never missing. This was a tall drinking cup filled with Rhine wine sweetened with sugar. In it was placed a stick of cinnamon, - a long one if the child were a boy and a short one if a girl. When this was handed, the sugar was stirred in the cup with the cinnamon stick by the person who presented it.

Uninvited guests sometimes entered the house on the sly on such occasions, for the more merriment and drinking the more honor for the baby. Being at a christening was long remembered, and in later years people often remarked to a young man or woman, "Oude Kennis, ik heb bij je nog een stik met suiker gehad", "Old friend, I had a sugar piece with you."

At the christening dinner gifts for the child were presented or promised. These presents were kept in the "show cabinet" where the bride's wedding gifts and the bridegroom's pipe were on exhibition. - from "Dutch New York" by Esther Singleton, 1930, and "The Dutch and English on the Hudson".

A daughter, Ann, was christened in October 1748 in the Walpack church. This time Thomas' name was spelled Hesson, though Catherina's name was spelled properly. Dirk Kermer and Jacomyntje Keyser, syn Huys vr. were witnesses.

Catherina Kleyn and Johannes Kleyn, probably her brother, were witnesses at the baptism of Johannes, the son of Thomas Brinck and Antje Kleyn, on 25 December 1748. - from "The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record." Johannes Kleyn and Eva Brink were witnesses at the baptism of Catherina's son, William, in 1754.

In 1748 the village of Smithfield was established near the present site of Stroudsburg.

A Thomas Jr. was born in about 1750 and Abner probably followed in 1752, though these weren't in any church registers that I have been able to find. I suspect they were christened at another of the Dutch churches in the region, one whose records were lost or haven't been put on the internet.

A son, William, was baptized in 1754 at the Walpack church and Thomas Sr's' name was again spelled Hisson. Johannes Kleyn and Eva Brink were witnesses.

Note that while I'm usually pretty willing to accept different spellings for the Heysham/Hissem surname, when you get to Hesson you begin to run into a name that was being misspelled from another root name. That Hesson ends up being German, derived from Hussong-Hessong-Hesson, and sometimes Hisson. There was a colonial era Pennsylvania family descended from Balthazar Hussong. They were members of the German Reformed Church.

At this time about 3,000 European settlers lived in the Upper Delaware river valley, though the area north of the Blue Mountains was still considered to be "thinly settled."

Thomas Hisson and Catharina Kleyn syn Huys vr. [the wife of] were witnesses at the baptism of Cathrina, the daughter of Johannes Bosch and Mary Johnson, on 2 February 1755 at the Dutch Reformed Church in Walpack, New Jersey - from "The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record."

Indian Troubles

What in America was known as the French & Indian War, and in Europe the Seven Years War, began in 1755 and lasted until 1763. During this period the generally friendly, or at least not hostile, relations the Pennsylvanians had with the Indians broke down under the provocation of French insurgents and the long simmering anger over the Walking Purchase.

All through the summer and early fall of 1755 there were whispers of alarming disaffection among the Indian tribes. Inflamed by French provocateurs and emboldened by the English General Braddock's defeat in July 1755 by a combined French & Indian force in the west, they saw a chance to win back lost territory.

The thunderbolt finally fell in November with an attack on Moravian settlers on the Mahoning Creek.

"A letter from Bethlehem, dated December the eighteenth [1755], states, "that a party of Indians had gathered behind the Blue mountains, to the number of two hundred, and had burned the greatest part of the buildings, and killed upward of a hundred of the inhabitants; and that they threatened the uper Moravian places, as Christiansbrun, Gnadenthal, Nazareth, and Friedenthal." - from "The History of Pennsylvania" by Thomas Francis Gordon
27 November 1755. "The Dwelling-house, Meeting-house and all their Out-houses were burnt to Ashes, with all the Grain and Hay, the Horses, and more than forty Head of fat Cattle for the Use of the Brethren at Bethlehem and their other settlements." - The Pennsylvania Gazette, Dec. 4, 1755. - from "Extracts from American Newspapers, Relating to New Jersey. 1704-1775"
A few days later the Indians hit the Smithfield community, attacking the farm of Daniel Brodhead, near the mouth of the Brodhead creek. This attack was repelled and the Indians proceeded to the homes of other settlers in the area, burning homes, barns and ricks, and killing and scalping many of the settlers.
"Mr. Broadhead estimated the number of warriors at two hundred. This attack upon the settlement was marked by the same atrocity characterizing much of the border warfare. As all the Susquehanna and Lackawanna Indians except the Monseys [the Minsi tribe of the Lenni-Lenape, or Delaware] were disposed for peace in the spring of 1757, Mr. Miner [in his "History of Wyoming"] concludes that the Oneidas and Senekas [sic] from the lakes formed the war party." - from "History of the Lackawanna Valley" by Horace Hollister, 1885
"Another letter, from Union works, Jersey, of the 20th [December 1755], says, "the barbarous and bloody scene which is now open in the upper parts of Northampton county, is the most lamentable that perhaps ever appeared. There may be seen horor and desolation; populous settlements deserted; villages laid in ashes; men, women, and children, cruelly mangled and massacred; . . ." To this letter was annexed a list of seventy-eight persons killed, and more than forty settlements burned." - from "The History of Pennsylvania" by Thomas Francis Gordon

The region, long used to peace, succumbed to panic and the people fled, seeking safety in the south. It was reported soon after that the river, from Broadhead creek south to Easton, was deserted in the aftemath of the attacks.


"Colonel John Anderson, who was on his March towards Gnadenhutten [the Moravian Settlement] with some of the New Jersey Militia, and a Company from the Irish Settlement, . . . judged it improper to advance against so large a Body at that Hour, and therefore retreated back to the Gap of the Mountains, to secure that Pass till he should obtain further Intelligence." . . . and that the Deponent [Moses Totamy], upon the Credit of the above Report was removing his Family, from the Forks [of the Delaware] to Trenton for Safety." - The Pennsylvania Gazette, Dec. 4, 1755. - from "Extracts from American Newspapers, Relating to New Jersey. 1704-1775"
"The Forks of the Delaware" is at Easton, south of the Blue Mountains, where the Lehigh River empties its waters into the greater Delaware. It is across the river from Warren county, New Jersey.
29 November 1755. "By three Expresses arrived from Northampton County within three Days past, we have Advice, That last Monday Night the French and Indians burnt a small village seven Miles beyond the Gap, and killed all the People but two; and Tuesday Night burnt a House above the Mountain, six Miles from where Delaware crosses Penaqualing, or Pequetin, Mountains, all in the aforesaid County." - from "Extracts from American Newspapers, Relating to New Jersey. 1704-1775"
The Pequetin mountains are a small range just north of the Blue, or Kittakinny, Mountains and just south of the Brodhead creek region. The Pequetin and Blue mountains are separated by Cherry creek, which empties into the Delaware river at Aaron Depui's 1725 homestead.

Those who chose to stay despite the danger collected themselves together in some one house for a common defense. "After Indians began attacking homesteands in Lower Smithfield Township in Northampton County, for example, nine families gathered at Philip Bozart's dwelling, while "a great Number" of others convened at the farms of two other neighbors. These houses were frequently fortified in some manner and stood as makeshift forts, the main purpose of which was to protect women and children. Thus, even after they heard gun shots at a nearby house, the people at Bozart's house "were afraid to venture to go and see what had happened that Day, as they had many Woman [sic] and Children to take Care of, who it they had left might have fallen an easy Prey to the Enemy." - from "Friends and Enemies in Penn's Woods."

An inscription on a stove plate cast in 1756 memorialized the dreadful times:

"This is the year in which raged the Indian war parties." - from "Sweet Land of Liberty: The Ordeal of the American Revolution in Northampton County, Pennsylvania," by Francis S. Fox.

The Hesoms lived on Brodhead creek, about four miles upstream from Daniel Brodhead's farm. They too were hit by Indian attacks and Thomas' daughter, Molly, was taken prisoner. She was carried off and it is not clear whether the family ever saw her again.

"Raiders also used psychological war against civilians. Particularly on the northern border of Pennsylvania, Indian raiders mutilated the bodies of women and children, displaying them at crossroads or other locations where they would be sure to be discovered. These tactics were largely responsible for the mass panic on the frontier and proved immensely successful in persuading thousands of settlers to abandon their homes." - from "Breaking the Backcountry" by Matthew C. Ward.

A Captive of the Indians

Molly was probably outside the house, perhaps drawing water for her mother, when an Indian raiding party attacked and seized her. During extended raids, as occurred along the Brodhead creek that day, the Indians would tie their captives to a tree, then come back for them as they made their retreat. If the settlers organized quickly and counter-attacked, the Indians would kill these captives and take their scalps to prove their participation in the raid.

The next few days would have been a horror to the 10 year old Molly. For those who have read "The Lord of the Rings," think of the capture of Merry and Pippin and their forced march across Rohan. The raiding party lived by its speed and stealth. Any prisoner who could not keep up with their killing pace, those who stumbled, those who slackened, were summarily tomahawked. Molly would have noticed and would have been terrified to show any weakness.

It is not known where the party took Molly initially, but it would not be out of the ordinary for them to have run the entire way to the French forts on Lake Ontario, either Niagara, on the west end of the lake, or Oswego, at the east end. There Molly might have been sold to the French as a house servant or field laborer, but may as well have been adopted into an Indian family to replace one of their own lost in battle, especially as she was young. Some female captives married local French settlers. Another film to consider is John Ford's "The Searchers" for the tale of a young girl taken by the Indians, and later rescued. Note the equivocal feelings evinced about a woman who had been "amongst" the Indians.

A large number of the homesteads along the Brodhead were burnt. The following is from a letter describing the destruction.

Philadelphia, December 25.
Extract of a Letter from the Union Iron Works in
the Jersey, dated December 20, 1755.

"The inclosed is a List of the Persons killed, and of the Houses Burnt on the Upper parts of Northampton, as near as I could collect, which may [be] depended upon as authentick; for I have strictly enquired of the Particulars, and chuse rather to deminish than add - The barbarous and bloody Scene which is now opened in the above Place is the most lamentable that perhaps ever appeared; -- there is no Person who is possessed of any Humanity, but would commiserate the deplorable Fate of those unhappy People: There may be seen Horror and Desolation;-- populous Settlements deserted;--Villages laid in Ashes;--Men, Women and Children, cruelly mangled and massacred; -- some found in the Woods, very nauseous for want of Interment: Some just reeking from the Hands of their Savage Slaughterers, and some hacked and covered all over with Wounds. -Samuel Depuy seems to be very near being in the same deplorable Condition, and will unavoidably share the same Fate with his Neighbours; for the fatal Blow is impending. - on his applying to Mr. Stewart and myself, we raised a fine Company of Men to go to his Assistance, and when we arrived there, we were informed that Broadhead's House which is about five Miles further up, was surrounded and besieged by the Indians: Upon which we marched to his relief, and escorted him and his Effects to Depuy's, with what Cattle and Provisions we could find in the Neighborhood. - We continued thereabouts four Days, and all the while heard nothing but Outcries and Alarms, and our Centries were fired upon by some Indians hovering about Depuy's House, which may be deemed a sure Prognostick of its Destruction. Last Tuesday Morning we had Intelligence of some Indians being in the Swamp, about two Miles distant form Robert Allison's; whereupon we went in Quest of them with the utmost Expedition, and soon got sight of them, driving off a Parcel of large Hogs, when we imprudently dismounted our Horses, but we were obliged to halt, and acknowledge ourselves no Match for them at the Heels : However we recover'd the Hogs, and had we kept our Horses, we would have undoubtedly have taken and killed every one of them."

On the back of the above was wrote, -- I have, while sealing this Letter, an Express, acquainting, that the Indians have crossed Delaware in a large Body. -

A List of the people killed, and the Houses burnt,
by the Indians at the Minisinks.
Killed, viz.


John Rush, his Wife, Son and Daughter, 4
Lambert Brink, 1
Benjamin Tidd and Family, 10
Matthew Rue, 1
Daniel Williams, his Wife, and five Children, 7
Piercewell Goulding, 1
Mr. Head, and ten of his Family 11
Cornelius Vanaken, and Guizebert Vancamp With fifteen of their Families 17
Several Palatines, and their Families, supposed to be about, 20
Hans Vanfleara, 4
Adam Snell, no Account of his Family, but Supposed about 5
--
in all 78

Houses burnt

Robert Hannah's ; William James'; senior ; William M'Nabb's ; Robert Allison's ; John Atkins's, Esq; John Fish's ; Robert Harris's ; Thomas Hill's ; Giles Churchill' ; Jacob Petty's ; William Lawrence's ; Abraham Garno's ; Dennis Rozor's ; Robert Park's ; Ephraim Culver's Saw and Grist Mills ; John Drake's, senior; John M'Michael's ; Samuel Gutteridge's; Francis Jone's ; Abraham Hartman's ; Daniel Brundidge's ; Benjamin Tidd's ; junior ; Solomon Jenkins's ; William Tidd's; John Tidd's ; Capt. Johnson's ; Joshua Parker's ; Job Beckhorn's ; John Hiliman's ; Mr. Countryman's ; Daniel Reever's ; Samuel Drake's ; Daniel Logan's ; Abraham Miller's ; Jacob Sly's ; Jacob Roror's ; William James's, junior ; Bodewine Vanderlap's ; William Whittin's ; and John Hoey's.

- The N.Y. Mercury, Dec. 29, 1755" - from "Extracts from American Newspapers, Relating to New Jersey. 1704-1775"
Thomas Hesom's neighbor, at least in 1766, John Houay [above as Hoey], had his homestead burnt.

The frontier populace was terrified, and vengeful, and in reaction Pennysylvania took unprecedented steps. It declared war on the Indians, agreed to raise a militia, built a series of frontier forts and put a bounty on Indian scalps. This sea-change in Pennsylvania politics horrified the Quakers and caused them to leave the government en-masse, severing their 70-year hold on government.

Benjamin Franklin was commissioned a Colonel by the Governor to take charge of the forts' construction, as well as of the entire line of operations along the Northampton frontier. One of the new frontier forts was Fort Hamilton, located at Brodhead creek.

The Frontier Forts: Forts Hamilton and Hyndshaw

The initial Indian attacks on the Hoeth and Brodhead families in the winter of 1755 caused a panic. The Pennsylvania Assembly agreed to raise a militia and the militia members overwhelmingly voted Benjamin Franklin, a member of the Assembly, as their "general." The Governor and the proprietors, political opponents of Franklin, were not happy, but felt they could do little to oppose the popular Franklin. They appointed Franklin and James Hamilton "military commissioners" for the county.

The commissioners arrived at Easton, just south of Lower Smithfield township, on 23 December 1775. They directed that the first of a line of forts be constructed in what today is the town of Stroudsburg, on Brodhead creek, at the homstead of PeterLa Bar. This fort was named Fort Hamilton in honor of James Hamilton, Franklin's fellow commissioner, and was built in January 1756 by a team of volunteer militia under the command of Captains Trump and Ashton. This, and the other frontier forts, were rude affairs, more stockades than fortresses. Trump became its first commander.


A modern recreation of a frontier stockade with blockhouse

Attacks continued during the building of the fort and those families trying to return to their homes, even when under armed escort, did not escape the threat. The family of Hess was almost completely wiped out in this manner. About this same time a Palatine, while breaking flax on the farm of Philip Bossert in Lower Smithfield, was shot and killed by an unseen Indian. One of Bossert's sons ran out of the house on hearing the gun and was also shot and killed. Philip, himself, then appeared and exchanged shots with the enemy and was saved only by the arrival of his neighbors which caused the enemy to retreat.

Fort Hamilton was not considered a post of especial importance. While it was in a geographically important position, it stood in a more or less sparsely settled district. The sudden outbreak of hostilities in that vicinity caused an excitement which resulted not only in its immediate erection, but also in the building of Fort Hyndshaw just a few miles away, as well as the occupation by a garrison at Dupui's house, which was also in the vicinity.

Fort Hyndshaw was probably located at the mouth of the Big Bushkill river where it emptied into the Delaware, no one is quite certain. Note that the road from Fort Hamilton to Fort Hyndshaw led past Depui's, which was along the river and that we are told it was an "open road from Depui's to Fort Hyndshaw." Captain Van Etten had his homestead on Bushkill creek.

The fort was a seventy-foot square stockade, with two bastions, around the Hyndshaw home. It was located on Bushkill creek, south of present-day Bushkill, in Lehman township, Pike county, Pennsylvania. From January 1756 to July 1757 it was the extreme northeastern post garrisoned by Pennsylvania troops. It was evacuated on orders of Governor Denny and the men moved to Fort Hamilton. - from "Forts on the Pennsylvania Frontier, 1753-1758" by William Albert Hunter

For defense the colony planned to erect 12 stockaded forts, 15 miles apart, that could house 50 men each. These fortifications were to run from the Upper Delaware Valley southwestward across the colony to the Susquehanna river to act as guard posts to protect and prevent raids on the more populated areas in the southeast. Four forts were planned for Northampton County, but only two were built, Fort Hamilton, in present-day Stroudsburg, and Fort Hyndshaw, standing along Bushkill creek near present-day Bushkill, in Pike county. The armchair strategists will quickly realize that these forts would constitute less a wall than a sieve and isolate their small cadre of defenders to be picked off one by one.

In January 1756 Benjamin Franklin issued the following instructions to raise a force for the protection of Upper Smithfield.

"To Cap’t Vanetta [John Van Etten], of the Township of Upper Smithfield.
Sir:
1 – You are to proceed immediately to raise a Company of Foot, consisting of 30 able Men, including two Sergeants, with which you are to protect the Inhabitants of Upper Smithfield assisting them while they thresh out and Secure their Corn, and Scouting from time to time as you judge necessary, on the Outside of the Settlements, with Such of the Inhabitants as may join you to discover the Enemy’s Approaches and repel their Attacks.

2 – For the better Security of the Inhabitants of that District, you are to post your men as follows: Eight at your own house, Eight at Lieutenant Henshaw’s, Six with a Serjeant at Tishhock ____, and Six with another Serjeant at or near Henry Cortracht’s, and you are to settle Signals, or Means of Suddenly alarming the Inhabitants, and convening your whole Strength with the Militia of your District, on any necessary Occasion.

3 – Every Man is to be engag’d for one month, and as the Province cannot at present furnish Arms or Blankets to your Company, you are to allow every Man enlisting and bringing his own Arms & Blanket, a Dollar for the Use thereof over and above his Pay.

4 – You are to furnish your Men with provisions, not exceeding the Allowance mentioned in the paper herewith given you and your reasonable Accounts for the same shall be allowed and paid.

5 – You are to keep a Diary or Journal of every Day’s Transactions, and an exact Account of the Time when each Man enters himself with you, and if any Man desert or die you are to note the Time in your Journal, and the Time of engaging a new Man in his Place, and submit your Journal to the Inspection of the Governor when required.

6 – You are to acquaint the Men, that if in their Ranging they meet with, or are at any Time attack’d by the Enemy, and kill any of them, Forty Dollars will be allow’d and paid by the Government for each Scalp of an Indian Enemy so killed, the same being produced with proper Attestations.

7 – You are to take care that your Stores and Provisions be not wasted.

8 – If by any means you gain Intelligence of the Design of the Enemy, or the March of any of their Parties towards any Part of the Frontier, you are to send Advice thereof to the Governor, and to the other Companies in the Neighborhood, as the Occasion may require.

9 – You are to keep good Order among your Men, and prevent Drunkenness and other Immoralities, as much as may be, and not Suffer them to do any Injury to the Inhabitants whom they come to protect.

10 – You are to take Care the Men keep their Arms clean and in good Order, and that their Powder be always kept dry and fit for Use.

11 – You are to make up your Muster Roll at the Month’s End, in order to receive the Pay of your Company, and to make Oath to the Truth thereof before a Justice of the Peace, and then transmit the same to the Governor.

B. FRANKLIN

January 12th, 1756" - from the Pennsylvania Archives
Van Etten must have foreseen this request because on the same day Thomas Hesom and 45 other men signed up for militia duty.
"Allegations of Soldiers, 1756."
Jany 12th, 1756.

No. 1001.

We the Subscribers, do hereby engage ourselves to serve as Soldiers in his Majesty's Service under the Command of Captain John Vanetta [Van Etten], for the Space of one Month, and who ever of us shall get drunk, desert, or prove cowardly in Time of Action, or disobedient to our Officers, shall forfeit his Pay. This Agreement we make in Consideration of being allow'd at the rate of Six dollars pr. Month Wages, One Dollar for the use of a Gun and Blanket to each Man who furnish himself with them, and the Provisions and Rum mentioned in a Paper hereunto annex'd."

Signed [among others]
". . .
Hugh Clark. H his mark.
William Battey.
Francis Wright.
William Wright.
Thomas Little.
James Gray.
Corme rine, V his mark.
Henry Cole.
thomas heson.
James E molen, his mark.
Steward mackee.
Gert van Binslehaten.
Elias Decker.
gidon van aken.
. . ." - from "Officers and Soldiers in The Service of the Province of Pennsylvania, 1744-1765," the Pennsylvania Archives
Thomas signed his name while several others only made their mark, that is, they were illiterate. I don't know if there was any significance in Thomas' name being all in lower caps; capitalization in the list above does seem to be inconsitent.

"During the month of January, the Indian aggressions were continued, but were not so extensive as in the prior and succeeding months. The latter part of February, and throughout the month of March, they were very active and mischievous along the whole western and northern border." - from "The History of Pennsylvania" by Thomas Francis Gordon.

Fort Hamilton was garrisoned in June 1756 with a Lieutenant and 15 men. Fort Hyndshaw was garrisoned by 30 men under Captain John Van Etten and Lieutenant James Hyndshaw in 1756. On 20 April 1756 a letter to the Governor reported on “Capt. Vanetten at Minisinks, a Lieut. [Hyndshaw] And 30 men.” The fort was called Hyndshaw in honor of their Lieutenant, James Hyndshaw, and also because it was on his property. Note that in the Allegations above there were 46 signatories, not 30, none of which were Van Etten or Hyndshaw, though two men, John Kirman and John Stull, were shown as Sergeants. I suspect the use of the number 30 was a general one and that Captain Van Etten was happy to have as many men as he could hold on to.

Captain John Van Etten (c1720)

He was born in Knightsfield, Ulster county, New York in 1720 and married Maratje "Mary" Westfael. He was commissioned a Captain of the militia by Benjamin Franklin and placed in charge of Fort Hyndshaw. He was later in charge of Fort Hamilton in Smithfield. In 1754 he was judge of the orphan court and was, in 1760, coroner of the county. He later moved to North Carolina.

Lietenant James Hyndshaw (c1720)

He was born in about 1720 and was a contemporary of Thomas Hesom. He first married Hanna Varway, but she died. He then married Maria Depuy. He was a deacon and elder, and later an overseer of the Smithfield Dutch Reformed Church.

As early as 1755 James was an officer in provincial service, a Lieutenant under the command of Colonel James Burd. In 1756 he was a Lieutenant in Captain Wetterholt's [Nicholas Wetherholt] company, in charge of provincial forces stationed at Fort Hyndshaw. - from "Pennsylvania Archives." Late, in 1761, Captain James Hyndshaw was sent by the Governer to observe the Connecticut settlement in the Wyoming Valley and made a deoposition of his findings.

Captain Van Etten kept a journal of his time as commander of Fort Hyndshaw and Fort Hamilton which is a combination of army drudgery, boredom, and occasional battle with the elusive Indians. Van Etten and James Hyndshaw were selected to head this unit because they resided in the Upper Smithfield region. Since Thomas signed up with them does this imply that his farm was closer to that region than to Lower Smithfield, as previoulsy thought? Bushkill in today in Lehman township, Pike county. The family of Bernardus Swartwout Jr., whose widow Thomas Hesom would marry circa 1768, lived in Lehman township.

The Frontier Forts: Forts Hamilton and Hyndshaw

Commissary James Young, while inspecting the forts in that same year, made the following report, writing from the “Fort 10 miles above Depues, Commonly call’d Hyndshaw Fort.”

"June 23, 1756 - At 3 P. M. we sett out from Fort Noris on our way to Fort Hamilton. At 6 P.M. we came to Philip Bosarts a Farmer, 12 miles from Fort Noris, here we Stayed all Night, on our way to this house the road very hilly and Barran, past by three Plantations Deserted and the houses Burnt down, in Bossart's house are 6 Families from other Plantations."

24 June, Fort Hamilton. - At 4 A.M. sett out from Basarts [sic], at 6 Came to Fort Hamilton at ab't 7 miles from Bosarts, a Good Waggon road, and the Land better than any I had seen on the N'o side of the Mountain. Fort Hamilton stands in a Corn field by It Farm house in a Plain and Clear Country, it is a Square with 4 half Bastions all very Ill Contriv'd and finish'd, the Staccades open 6 inches in many Places, and not firm in the ground, and may be easily pull'd down, before the gate are some Staccades drove in the Ground to Cover it which I think might be a great Shelter to an Enemy, I therefore order'd to pull them down, I also order'd to fill up the other Staccades where open. Provincial Stores: 1 Wall Piece [probably a swivel gun], 14 G'd Muskets, 4 wants Repair, 16 Cartootch Boxes, filled with Powder and Lead, 28 lb Powder, 30 lb. Lead, 10 Axes, 1 Broad Axe, 26 Tomahauks, 28 Blankets, 3 Drawing Knives, 3 Splitting Knives, 2 Adses, 2 Saws, 1 Brass Kettle.

June 24, 1756 – At 8 A.M. I sett out from Fort Hamilton for Sam’l Depues where Cap’tn Weatherholt’s Lieu’t and 26 men are Stationed, when I came there his Muster Roll was not ready, I therefore proceeded to the next Fort [Hyndshaw] 10 miles higher up the River, at 1 P.M. Came there, it is a good Plain Road from Depue’s, many Plantations this way, but all Deserted, and the houses Chiefly Burnt. Found at this Fort Lieut. Ja’s Hyndshaw w’th 25 men he told me the Cap’tn with 5 men was gone up the River yesterday, and did not Expect him back these two days, they had been informed from the Jerseys that 6 Indians had been seen, and fired at the night before 18 miles up the River. – Provincial Stores, 11 Good Muskets, 14 Rounds of Powder & Lead for 30 men, 4 lb Powder, 30 Blankets."

"This Fort is a Square ab’t 70 f’t Each way, very Slightly Staccaded. I gave some direction to alter the Bastions which at present are of very little use, it is clear all round for 300 yards, and stand on the Banks of a Large Creek, and ab’t ¼ mile from the River Delaware, and I think in a very important Place for the Defence of this Frontier; at 3 P.M. I muster’d the people, and find them agreeable to the Lieu’ts Roll, Regularly inlisted. Finding here such a small Quantity of Powder and Lead, and this Fort the most Distant Frontier, I wrote a Letter to Cap’tn Arrend (Orndt), at Fort Norris, where there is a Large Quantity desiring he would deliver to this Fort 30 lb Powder, and 90 lb Lead, and I promised he should have proper orders from his Superior Officer for so doing, in the meantime my letter should be his Security, in which I hope I have not done amiss as I thought it very necessary for the Good of this Service."

I drew much of this information from Frontier Forts of Pennsylvania. It also includes Captain Van Etten's log, which well describes the long periods of boredom, interrupted by grissly actions like the following.
"My Serj’t Leonard Den, with 2 men of, for subsistence to Sam’ll Depues, having got within about 2 milds of s’d Depues, s’d Sej’t was shot, the 2 men Return’d and inform’d me of it, where upon an alarm was beat, and the neighbours all gather’d to the fort; myself with 7 men went of immediately and found him Kill’d and Scalp’d, and intirely Strip’d and shamefully cut, that his bowls was Spred on the Ground, I immediately sent of 3 men to s’d Depues for a Wagon, which being come we carried him to s’d Depues, where we kept guarde that night . . . Early in the morning we Buried him in a Christian manner, & all Return’d to Fort Hyndshaw."
In April 1757 Captain John Van Etten took charge of Fort Hamilton, but by March 1758 it had been abandoned as a military camp.

I don't know how long Thomas remained with these volunteers. It is clear that the government thought the emergency would be a short one, hence the short enlistment, but I suspect Thomas responded to the call numerous times throughout the violent years of 1756 to 1758, taking his turn manning the fort and scouting out the enemy.

The Heysham's had another daughter, Elizabeth, who I think was born around 1756. I base that year on her probable age when her first son was baptized and where there exists a gap in the birth order. There was no minister to baptize this child. The Reverend Fryenmoet had fled the Indian troubles, moving to Kinderhook, New York in 1756 and a new minister was not found until 1760 [or 1764], when Thomas Romeyn began his service.

Indian Troubles

Attacks, mainly on isolated homsteads, continued in 1756 and 1757, the Indians "all painted and white Feathers on their Heads." In one attack the newly raised militia was heavily defeated. From a letter of Benjamin Franklin to the Governor:

"As we draw near this place, we met a number of wagons, and many people moving off with their effects and families, from the Irish settlement and Lehigh township, being terrified by the defeat of Hays company, and the burnings and murders committed in the townships on New Years Day. We found this place filled with refugees, the workmens shops, and even the cellars, being crowded with women and children; and we learned that Lehigh township is almost entirely abandoned by the inhabitants."

In April 1757 Andreas Gundryman, about 17 years old, went with two horses and a sleigh to fetch some fire wood that lay about 80 'perches' from Fort Hamilton, in order to bring it to his father's house, about 10 perches from the Fort. Two guns were heard to fire. Upon investigation Andreas Gundryman was found, just 300 yards from the fort, lying dead and scalped to the eyes.

In June 1757 George Ebert, 16, went with two wagons from Plainfield Township to assist the inhabitants of Lower Smithfield who had a few days before been attacked by Indians, to bring off some of their best effects. While working together they were attacked by fifteen Indians and 3 of the men were killed. The Indians then took the other two men hostage. The next day the Indians fell in with another company of about 24 Indians who had as prisoners Abram Miller, his mother, and Adam Snell's daughter. Coming to some Indian cabins they saw another prisoner, a girl about eight or nine years old. She told them that she had been a prisoner since Christmas. While Ebert and his friend were eventually able to escape, Abram Miller's mother and Adam Snell's daughter were both killed, being unable to keep up with the Indian party.

In the same year two soldiers of the garrison at Fort Hamilton were walking among the scrub oaks and were killed by a party of Indians in an ambush. Detachments of soldiers were also sent from the fort to guard the harvesters, but the soldiers were too few to perform the duties required of them. Needless to say, the settlers were alarmed and the government could afford them little or no protection. They wrote to the governor:

"The Petition of the Few Remaining Inhabitants of the Township of Lower Smithfield, in the County of Northampton, and in the Province of Pennsylvania:"

"That the Situation of the Petitioners being part of the Frontiers of the Province have for some time past suffered many and great Difficulties by the Excursions of the Savages, until your Hon'rs accession to this Province, and the Treaty held with the Indians at Easton, which afforded the prospect of a Peace, and gave your Petitioners encouragement to return to their Farms, in order to Plant and to Support their Distressed Familys in a peacable manner; But so it has happened, and please your Honour, to our inexpressible surprise, these perfidious murderers have renewed their Barbarities by killing, Scalping, and Captivating the Inhabitants in a most dreadful manner, which has obliged your honours petitioners to assemble with their Familys together for their Better defence, But as the Number of men now here will not be sufficient to defend themselves and Familys any long time against the Enemy, they must inevitably fall into their hands to be massacrey'd or desert the post now at _____, Either of which must be attended with fatal Consequences to the next Frontiers, and being well assured (under those dismall apprehensions) that the next under Divine Providence your Honour is our Protector, and therefore Desire that our deplorable Circumstances may be taken into Consideration, and that such relief therein may be Granted, as your Honour in your Wisdom shall direct, and your Honours Petitioners as in duty bound Shall ever Pray."

The Hesom family apparently fled Lower Smithfield, relocationg to Hunterdon county, New Jersey, perhaps as far south as Trenton. The neighboring counties offered no security against attack.

"The first inroads of the savages were down the Susquehanna through Berks and Northampton Counties, across the Delaware into New Jersey. Some of the scalping parties penetrated within thirty miles of Philadelphia. A letter from Easton, dated December 25th, 1755, states that the "country all above this town for fifty miles is mostly evacuated and ruined. The people have mostly fled into the Jerseys . . . During the winter of 1755 and 1756 marauding parties of French and Indians hung around this western border. To guard against their incursions, a chain of forts and block houses was erected along the mountains and at favorable points on the east bank of the Delaware." - from "The First Century of Hunterdon County, State of New Jersey" by George S. Mott, 1878
Was Elizabeth Hesom born in Pennsylvania, or in New Jersey where the family had taken shelter during the awful Indian onslaught?

New Jersey Prepares for War

As the war with France and its Indian allies expanded New Jersey's Governor worked with the colonial Assembly to find means to combat the "Perfidious French with their Cruel Allies the Savage and Barbarous Indians." In March 1756 an Act was passed to raise a force of 250 men to support and replace the militia already in place "at the several Forts on the Frontiers."

Soon after reports were received of two Indian attacks, including one on the home of Anthony Swartwood. His wife and three children had been murdered and Anthony Swartwood and three of his children were missing.

The Act of 1756 had also authorized the construction of frontier forts. Four blockhouses were built in Sussex county along the Delaware River. By 1757 there were a total of six blockhouses: the largest, at Fort Johns, was the headquarters for the New Jersey colonial defenses, in Walpack township. Fort Nominack was to the north and Fort Walpack, at the old church, was to the south. There was also Fort Van Camp, in Pahquarry township, Fort Cole, at Port Jervis and and Fort Shipeconk, about 6 miles south of there. Eventually there would be a 14 forts and posts in northwestern New Jersey.

Towards the end of 1757 Pennsylvania sent a plea for assistance against the Indian "outrages" to the other colonies, but, in light of the Quaker Assembly's previous reluctance to fund a militia, New Jersey's Governor Belcher wondered, "if the people of Pennsylvania, who may readily raise twenty thousand or thirty thousand men, will do nothing for the defense of their country, or for saving the lives of their wives and children, I am afraid the Assembly of this poor little Province will not think it reasonable to send their people out of the Province."

Extract of a Letter from Lower Smithfield, to a Gentleman in the Jerseys, dated Jan. 22, 1756

"I am left in a deplorable Condition, by the Province I belong to, and for what Reason I know not, and what to do I know not. To leave all to Savage Enemies is very hard, to be left by my own Country, and to be forced to fall their Pray, is still harder . . . The Gap is way-laid, so that No-body can Pass, but what are shot at." - Samuel Depui

- from "Extracts from American Newspapers, Relating to New Jersey. 1704-1775"

Governor Belcher ordered a muster of the militia in Morris, Essex, Hunterdon, and Bergen counties against the French and Indians who are "burning and murdering at the Forks of the Delaware." New Jersey sent a 500-man regiment north to New York as part of the planned conquest of Canada and a further 200 to the defense of the frontier in Sussex county.

We next find Thomas Hesom serving in the New Jersey militia. Apparently, like many others in the region, he had found Brodhead creek too dangerous and exposed to future attack, and had fled across the river. In March 1756 the New Jersey Colonial Assembly had established a frontier guard of 250 men, to be quartered in four forts along the Delaware river. The following notice was published by the New Jersey militia commander in July 1756.

"This is to give notice to all able bodied freeman not inhabitants of the county who are willing to enter the service of the province of New Jersey in defending the frontier parts of said province, that on their application to me the subscriber at Fort Johns or elsewhere in the county of Sussex they shall immediately be enlisted and be upon the province pay at TWO SHILLINGS proclamation money per day dated 22 June, 1756 (signed) Colonel Jacob De Hart Commander of the forces on the frontier service."
Thomas, forced off his land, would have been reduced to being a common laborer in a market flooded by other refugees. The pay promised in the advertisement above would have been enticing. Fort Johns was in Walpack township, just eight miles from Lower Smithfield, and was the headquarters of the New Jersey frontier defenses.

In early May 1757 Governor Belcher of New Jersey sent a force of 120 militia to the frontier in response to "Complaint & Certain Advice of the Indians Killing and Scalping Several Persons." These men were divided into 3 companies, Capt. Lemuel Bowers' Morris county company, Capt. Andries Ten Eick's Somerset county company, and Capt David Stout's Hunterdon county company. A muster was taken (referred to as C-11) and Thomas Hyson was listed as serving in Captain Stout's company. The enlistments with the Frontier Guard, like that of the Northampton militia, were for one month.

"A Muster Roll of the Detachment from Hunterdon County under the Command of Captain David Stout from the 9th May 1757 to the 11th June following Inclusive
Name . . . Notes
Stout, David (Captain) Probably of Hopewell
. . .
Hysom (Hessom/Hisom), Thomas Sergt to Jan. 16, 1758 " - from New Jersey Frontier Guard
I don't recognize the names of any of the other men in this muster. I would have expected to see Thomas in a Sussex county unit, as that county was just across the river from Lower Smithfield. A couple of scenarios suggest themselves.
- Thomas may have felt that Sussex county was too exposed as well and fled south, all the way to Hunterdon county, where Captain Stout recruited him for his company. Trenton, where Thomas was born, is located in Hunterdon county, just south of the village of Hopwewell, where Captain Stout had his plantation. Could Thomas have returned to his birthplace? Could his parents have still been living there?
- The other scenario is more prosaic. Captain Stout and most of his men may have come from Hunterdon county, but, after having been ordered to the frontier by Governor Belcher, other men were recruited locally, around Fort Johns, and were placed in Stout's company to bring the unit up to strength. Thomas was perhaps one of these men.

Hunterdon County

Hunterdon County was created in 1714 and was, at the time, the largest county in the state. It extended from the Assunpink Creek in Trenton to the New York state border. Old Hunterdon county was split in 1739, the northern part forming Morris County. Morris county was split in 1753, the western part, bordering the Delaware river, forming Sussex County. Sussex was split in 1824, the southern part forming Warren county. In 1838 Hunterdon county was split again, the southern part forming Mercer County, which included Trenton. Somerset was an inland county.

In June 1757 the New Jersey Colonial Assembly passed an Act authorizing pay for 120 militia. The privates were to be paid 20 pence a day [£2 10s per month], the sergeants 2 shillings, Lieutenants 3 shillings and the Captain 4. Each was to provide himself with "with a good and sufficient Musquet, Cartouch Box, Powder-Horn, Cutlas or Hatchet, Blanket, Knapsack, and Wearing-Apparel."

Captain Richard Gardiner took command of this force on 8 June 1757 and another muster was taken (referred to as C-14). Of the earlier county force of 120 men, 84 men had gone home and were replaced by 79 new men.

"Muster Roll of the Provincial Forces Commanded by Capt. Richard Gardiner on the Frontiers of New Jersey from the 8th of June to the 20th day of July 1757
Name ex Militia Notes
Gardiner, Richard (Captain) .
. . .
Hysom, Thomas (Sgt/Crp?) H also sp. Hessom/Hisom; Pvt May57 (C11); prob. Sgt/Cpr Jun 57 (C14); Sgt Jul57-Jan58 (C15/18) "
- from New Jersey Frontier Guard
Amongst the Privates were Nicholas Brink, Anthony Bush, Hermanus Decker, Daniel Depuy, Jacob Swartwout, and Benj'n Swartwout who look like Broadhead creek residents.
- Nicholas Brink was of Walpack.
- Hermanus Decker was of Walpack.
- Daniel Depuy was of Lower Smithfield. In 1752 he, his brother Samuel, and Abraham Van Campen directed the construction of the RDC at Lower Smithfield.
- Benjamin Swartwout was of Upper Smithfield.
"H" refers to Thomas' previous service with the Hunterdon militia - this was Capt David Stout's Hunterdon county company. Thomas was a Private in May 1757 on muster list C11, promoted to Sergeant in June on the C14 muster, remaining so until January 1758, when presumably he left the force.

Richard Gardiner was a magistrate in Sussex county. In other documents he was referred to as a Colonel. He was a descendent of Thomas Gardiner, of Burlington, above.

At each enlistment, that is every month, the "soldier was was required to take an oath from Col. Abraham Van Campen, Richard Gardiner's co-commander, or Judge John Rosencrans with an officer as witness. A certificate would then be issued to the captain stating the recruit's age, height, complexion, and place of residence. These certificates would be compiled into a muster-roll, and at the end of the pay period, the paymaster would examine the certificates and certify the muster-roll." I wonder if those certificates still exist?

Another muster was taken in September 1757 (referred to as C-15).

"Muster Roll of Provincial Forces Stationed on the Frontiers of the Province of New Jersey under the Command of Capt. Richard Gardiner . . . from the 20th July to 12th September 1757 first day included
Name ex Militia Notes
Gardiner, Richard (Captain) . Capt Jun57-Jul58 (C14/20)
. . .
Hyson, Thomas (Sergeant) H Also sp. Hessom/Hisom; Pvt May57 (C11); prob Sgt Jun57 (C14); Sgt Jul57-Jan58 (C14/18) "
- from New Jersey Frontier Guard
All of the Privates noted above were present, with the addition of Cornelius Schoonover and Jacob Brink as those who look like Broadhead creek residents.
- Cornelius Schoonover was of Walpack.
- Jacob Brink was of Walpack.

Another muster was taken in October 1757 (referred to as C-16).

"Muster Roll of Provincial Forces Stationed on the Frontiers of the Province of New Jersey under the Command of Capt. Richard Gardiner . . . from the 12th September to 18th October 1757 first day included
Name ex Militia Notes
Gardiner, Richard (Captain) . Capt Jun57-Jul58 (C14/20)
. . .
Hyson, Thomas (Sergeant) H Also sp. Hessom/Hisom; Pvt May57 (C11); prob Sgt Jun57 (C14); Sgt Jul57-Jan58 (C14/18) "
- from New Jersey Frontier Guard
All of the Privates noted above were present, with the addition of Jacob Stroud.
- Jacob Stroud was of Lower Smithfield.

Another muster was taken in December 1757 (referred to as C-17).

"Muster Roll of Provincial Forces Stationed on the Frontiers of the Province of New Jersey under the Command of Capt. Richard Gardiner . . . from the 18th October 1757 to 2d December first day included
Name ex Militia Notes
Gardiner, Richard (Captain) . Capt Jun57-Jul58 (C14/20)
. . .
Hyson, Thomas (Sergeant) H Also sp. Hessom/Hisom; Pvt May57 (C11); prob Sgt Jun57 (C14); Sgt Jul57-Jan58 (C14/18) "
- from New Jersey Frontier Guard
All of the Privates noted above were present, with the addition of James Brink for Jacob Brink, and John Lambertson. Jacob Swartout disappears.

Thomas was also in the militia muster roll for January 1758 (C-18), but it is, unfortunately, a bad link.

Indian Troubles

After 1757 the inroads of the Indians became less frequent. Efforts were made to bring about peace with the various tribes and the Delaware tribe was won over to the British side. As a result it was decided to abandon the Forts of the Minisink and the soldiers were moved south of the Wind Gap. In 1757 Fort Hynshaw was abandoned and in 1758 Fort Hamilton was also given up. The Mohawk, however, were still fighting on the side of the French and in June 1758 they attacked the settlements north of the ungarrisoned Fort Hamilton.

Despite these latter attacks, peace did return to region by the end of 1758. At about that time the Quakers helped negotiate a settlement with the Eastern Delawares that dramatically calmed the situation in Pennsylvania.

Beginning in 1758 the new British Prime Minister, William Pitt, put into action a strategy which dramatically altered the situation in America, and around the world, throwing the French onto the defensive and leading to the most sweeping victory in war in the history of England.

Sometime after January 1758, Thomas Hesom resigned from the New Jersey militia and returned to his homestead on Broadhead creek. A treaty was completed with the Delaware and Shawnee at Easton on 26 October 1758 and frontier life was not disrupted again until Pontiac's War in 1762.

On 25 July 1759 British troops under the command of Sir William Johnson captured the French fort at Niagara after a long siege. Inside they found

"numerous English men, women and children, who had been held captive there, some of them for years . . . One young woman was Molly Heysham, carried off in a raid in "the Blue Mountains," probably the Virginia frontiers [sic], four year before;" - from Publications of the Buffalo N.Y. Historical Society.
The Blue Mountains, known in New Jersey as the Kittatinny, formed the southern border of Lower Smithfield. The author of the citation above has confused this region with the Blue Ridge mountains of Virginia. Note the use of the name Heysham which the British officers would have "known" was the correct way to spell the name. Molly must have been carried off in 1755 and could have been as old as 10 at the time, or 14 when finally released. This would probably be the minimum age at which she could have been described as a "young woman" vice a child. The captives had been used as servants and laborers by the French and Indians of the fort.
"Heysham, Molly. Made captive "at the Blue Mountains," probabably in Virginia [sic], about 1755. She was found at Fort Niagara, with numerous other prisoners, when it surrendered to the British, July 25, 1759, and was no doubt sent to New York by way of Oswego, with the other rescued prisoners of the French and the surrendered garrison, which included a number of French women and children." - from "The Tale of Captives at Fort Niagara; Publications of the Buffalo Historical Society, volume IX"
Oswego was a French fort on the south shore of Lake Ontario. It was due north of Smithfield, in present day New York state. Molly's story was also cited in a contempory source, the New York Mercury of 20 August 1759.

There is no other evidence for Molly's existence so it cannot be determined whether she ever saw her folks again, but it was a long way back to Smithfield through hostile Indian territory, in the middle of a war that was to last 4 more years. I suspect she married a nice young man near the fort and settled down where she was.

Historical Timeline: Reign of Kings
1760-1820 George III

The American & French Revolutions. Napoleanic Wars. During the King’s fits of madness the Prince of Wales ruled as Regent (the Regency period). Also Elector, later King, of Hanover.

By 1800 the population of England and Wales had exploded to 16.3 million.

In 1760 or 1762 David, my forebear and the last son of Thomas Hesom, was born.

Indian Troubles

For five years the peace was kept, with only occasional attacks and reprisals. In 1763, however, the chief of the Delawares was killed by a party of Mohawk warriors, burnt alive in his own house. The Mohawk had been accustomed to look upon the Delawares with contempt as "women" and not true warriors, and were not happy with the Delaware's role in securing a peace. The Mohawk then blamed the death on local white settlers which incited the Delaware to break the peace. This occurred at the same time as the rising of Pontiac's War in the west.

Pontiac had put together a wide-ranging alliance of tribes, some of whom descended again on Northampton county, the outlier of Pennsylvania settlements. Smithfield was struck hard and many cabins were burned and their occupants killed. Refugees once again clogged the trails heading south. Panic spread as far as Philadelphia, where the Assembly met to address the danger. Attacks continued in the Smithfield region into 1764. The defeat of Pontiac in the west, and the effect of an aroused militia, finally succeeded in stopping the attacks, but not before more than 60 settlements had been burned.

There is an excellent old movie, "Drums Along the Mohawk," starring Henry Fonda and Claudette Colbert, and directed by John Ford, that gives a good feel to life on the frontier under the threat of Indian attack.

Catherina Kleyn died after about 1760-2, perhaps in the birth of her last child, David, or during the Indian troubles of 1763-64.

Thomas was witness to the will of Thomas Brink of Walpack, the husband of Catherina's sister, Anne.

"1761, Dec. 8. Brink, Thomas, of Walpack Twsp., Sussex Co., yeoman; will of. Wife, Anne, 1/2 of my whole estate, and at her death the whole to be given to my 11 children, viz., Nicholas, James, Eve, Hendrika, Rachel, Cathrine, Sarah, John, Thomas, Yanatie, and Franzintie. Executors — Emanuel Gonsales, of Upper Smithfield, Northampton Co., Penna., and my wife. Witnesses — Thomas Hesom, James Bartron, Joseph Chestnore. Proved June 25, 1763.

1762, July 7. Inventory, £64.3.0, made by Thomas Hesom, and John Westbrook. Lib. 11, p. 466."
- from "Calendar of New Jersey Wills, Administrations, etc" by Elmer Tindall Hutchinson, 1947
The Brink family lived in the Walpack precinct not far from the church. Of the children in Thomas Brink's will above, Nicholas, James, Eva, Hendrickje and Franzintie were the children of Thomas' first wife, Francis Schoonhoven, the others belonged to Anne.

Thomas Brink's executor, Emanuel Gonsales, was a leading member of the community. His name is widely noted throughout this page. James Bartron, of Walpack, was the son of David Bartron. His daughter, Sarah, would marry Thomas Brink's youngest son, Thomas Jr., in 1786.

A researcher of the Howey family notes a warrant [a land warrant?] for a property in Smithfield, Pennsylvania in 1766:

"John Howey shown next to Thomas Hessam in Smithfield. Warrant Appl. #2538; Survey map C-86-136" - from "Ancestors of Robert T. Howey."
Since Thomas' name was noted in the list of land warrants I'll assume that means that he owned his land. John Howey was born in Ireland circa 1715 and emigrated circa 1745. He joined Thomas Heson and others in 1746 in an unsuccessful petition to formally organize Smithfield township, above. His homestead was burnt out in the Indian attacks of 1755. John Howey died in Smithfield, circa 1782.

Thomas remarried sometime after 1768. Based on baptismal records of the Lower Smithfield Dutch Reformed Church and other records, I believe Thomas married Elizabeth Brink. She was Lambert Brink's great-grand-daughter, through Lambert's youngest son, Pieter Lambertsen Brink, and his son, Cornelius. She was the widow of Bernardus Swartwout Jr., who had died in 1768. I think the local minister, seeing Thomas, with six sons and no wife, and Elizabeth, with five sons and no husband, brought the two together for their mutual benefit. I do not believe the two had any children together.

In the Proprietary tax of 1772 for Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county our Thomas was again listed with John Howey,

"Howey, John, fa'r, 1.6.8
Hysem, Tho's, fa'r [farmer], 1.6.8" - from "Proprietary, Supply, and State Tax Lists of the Counties of Northampton and Northumberland for the Years 1772 to 1787" by Northampton County (Pa.)
The tax was 1 pound, 6 shillings, and 8 pence. No other Hissom-variant names were listed. Items referenced for the Howey/Howay/Houay family that I need to look into include (should I ever get to Pennsylvania):
- Marriage Index: New Jersey, 1680-1900. Produced by Family Tree Maker Family Archives.
- Warrant Registry, 1741-1752, microfilm roll, Pennsylvania Archives, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
- Copied Surveys, microfilm roll, Pennsylvania Archives, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
- Bucks/Northampton County Deed Book.
- Bucks County Court of Common Pleas File #4556, Spruance Library, Doylestown, Pennsylvania.
- Collections of the New York Genealogical & Biographical Society, Vol. V, VIII and XL.
- Register of Wills, Main Office, City Hall Room 180, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. - "The Reformed Dutch Church Records and the Presbyterian Church Records at Smithfield"
See also Some Baptisms and Burials and More.

The Story of Elizabeth Brink and Her Sons

In several baptismal records Thomas Heysham and Elizabeth Brink were linked as witnesses. This included two Heysham baptisms in 1788; for Joab Heysham, the son of David Heysham, and for James Heysham Sullivan, the son of Elizabeth Heysham and Daniel Sullivan, but also for the daughter of Levi Swartwout, Thomas' step-son, and Rachel White at the Smithfield church. This daughter was Elizabeth, born in December 1791. The Swartwout’s second child, Mary, was born in August 1792 (quick work), but did not have her christening witnessed by the pair.

While I don't have anything as certain as a marriage certificate, I think its clear that Thomas and Elizabeth were married. That would mean that Thomas raised the five [or six] Swartwout boys as well as his own six. That part of the theory would hang together better if Levi Swartwout, above, had been listed in the will of his grandfather, Bernardus Swartwout Sr, from where the other five Swartwout names come. Note that Levi's father, Bernardus, had predeceased his father by at least 5 years so this will should have been inclusive.

A note in favor of Levi Swartwout as a son of Elizabeth Brink includes a request for a Revolutionary War pension made by David Heysham, Thomas's youngest son. In it David claimed that "the family Bible left by affiants [one who makes an affidavit] father, in which his age was recorded, fell into the hands of a Levi Swartwoot a stepson of affiants father, after his fathers death . . ."

A recently discovered source contains another indication of the close relationship between Thomas and the Swartwood boys, in this case, Gerardus:

Court on March 1783
Guardian for Gerardus Swartwood, over 14 yrs, grandson of Bernardus Swartwood, Delaware Twp.
Petitioner: Thomas Heysham, next friend
Guardian: Emanuel Gonzalez [Gonsales] - from "Genealogical Abstracts of Orphans Court Records - Northampton County, Pennsylvania, Volumes A-E - 1752 - 1795" by Candace E. Anderson
If Gerardus was born in 1766, he would have been 17 at the time of this petition. What does this document mean? Several scenarios suggest themselves, but I think it likely that Emanuel had been named guardian in Bernardus Swartwout's will, he was a close friend of Bernardus Sr., and Thomas was petitioning for guardianship as the boy's step-father.

What the Heck was Manuel Gonsales Doing in Colonial Pennsylvania?

This was Emanuel Gonsales, sometimes as Gonzalez, Gunsaulus, or Gunsalis.

(18) Emmanuel Gonsales-Duk (c1670)

The suffix is sometimes Dolk or Duck and, while some researchers want to read this as Duke, I suspect, in line with Spanish surname practice, it denoted the family name of Emmanuel's mother. He was probably a Spanish Puritan or Huguenot who fled Spain, or more likely the Spanish Netherlands, for America. There were supposedly three brothers who came at the same time: Peter, Manuel and Richard, but there is no further information on the other brothers or their descendents. Emmanuel lived amongst the Dutch in Ulster county, New York. He first married Marritje Christoffels [Christophers] Davids. His second wife was Rebecca Westfall. Manuel died on 18 April 1758 and was buried in Wurtsboro, Sullivan county, New York.

(19) Emmanuel Gonsales (1694)
(18) Emmanuel Gonsales-Duk (c1670)

The eldest son of Emmanuel and Marritje, he was baptized on 16 November 1694 in Kingston, Ulster county, New York. He married Rymerick Quick on 25 September 1719 in Kingston. He settled in Wurtsboro. His father, Emmanuel Sr., died while visiting him there and was so buried in Wurtsboro.

(20) Emanuel Gonsales (c1720)
(18) Emmanuel Gonsales-Duk (c1670) (19) Emmanuel Gonsales (1694)

Emanuel is mentioned in many documents about the Minisink, usually associated with the leading men of the community. He first married Rachel Louw. His second wife was Jannetjen, the daughter of Jacob van Etten.

"March 23, 1750 Manuel Gonsales, widower of Rachel Louw, dwelling at Memmekatting to Jannetje Van Etten, young woman, born at Nepenack and dwelling at Nameback, married the 23d ditto." - from "Jacobus Jansen Van Etten" by Eva Alice Scott
She was born 20 April 1729. They resided near Bushkill, Pennsylvania.

Emanuel Gonsales was an associate of Redolphus [sic] Schoonover and Lieutenant James Hyndshaw, Thomas Hesom's commanding officer. In 1763 Lt. Hyndshaw and Emanuel Gonsales organized a petition of Pennsylvania's Colonial Governor, Andreas Digman, to obtain state assistance in the face of renewed Indian attacks. Hyndshaw recommended that Emanuel be designated the Commissary for the district during the emergency. Emanuel was also mentioned in the 1773/4 will of Bernardus Swartsworth [Swartwout] Sr., of Delaware township, as a friend. Bernardus was the father-in-law of Thomas Hesom's second wife, Elizabeth Brink. Emanuel was the exectutor of several Denmark family wills in the 1750's.

During the run-up to the Revolution Emanuel was elected to the Committee of Observation for Northampton county in 1774. Others included Peter Kachline, Jacob Arndt, John Wetzel, and Nicholas Depui Sr, the leaders of the community.

Emanuel Gonsales [could this be his son?] served in the Revolution as First Lieutenant of the 10th Company, Mamakating Precinct, of James Clinton's Second Regiment of the Ulster county militia. He fought at Fort Montgomery, as did John Hissom, Thomas Heson's eldest son.

The will of Manuel Gonsales, of Delaware township, was probated on 20 March 1789.

The Swartwout boys were Samuel (1754), Anthony (1756), Benjamin (1758), Gerardus (1760), Moses (1761), and Levi [if David is to be believed]. They were all born in the adjacent Lehman township of Northampton county.

The Brink family

The word Brink means "park, square or village green" in the Dutch language.

(17) Lambert Huybertsen Brink (1638)

He was born in 1638 in Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands. He married Hendrickje Cornelisse while in the Netherlands and before his emigration to America. He arrived in New Amsterdam in December, 1659 aboard the GELOOVE (FAITH). On 12 February 1696 he made and executed his last will and testament, which will was proved on 11 April 1702. He died in Hurley, Ulster county, New York.

(18) Huybert Lambertsen Brink (1656)
(17) Lambert Huybertsen Brink (1638)

The eldest son of Lambert and Hendrickje. He was born in July 1656 in Gelderland. He married Hendrickje Swartwout on 16 March 1679 in Kingston, New York. He died in Hurley, New York.

(19) Thomas Brink (1685)
(17) Lambert Huybertsen Brink (1638) (18) Huybert Lambertsen Brink (1656)

Thomas Brink was born on 6 December 1685 in Kingston, Ulster county, New York, the third son of Huybert and Hendrickje. He first married Francis Schoonhoven on 15 May 1729 in Kingston. ". . . Thomas Brink purchased 1,210 acres of land at Lower Walpack, just above the river bend Oct. 10, 1725, and donated and deeded 1737, to the "Christian people" of that community the church and burial grounds for the First Walpack Church, near the bend." - from "The Rosenkrans Family in Europe and America" by Allen Rosenkrans. Nicholas, James, Eva, Hendrickje and Franzintie were the children of Thomas and Francis.

Second he married Anne Kleyn, the sister of Catherina Kleyn, Thomas Hesom's wife, in about 1740. He died in 1761 in Montague, Sussex county, New Jersey. Rachel, Catherine, Sarah and John were Thomas and Anne's children.

(18) Pieter Lambertsen Brink (1670)
(17) Lambert Huybertsen (Brink)

He was the youngest child of Lambert and Hendrickje, baptized on 26 Jun 1670 in Kingston/Hurley, Ulster county, New York. He died on 2 May 1757 in Minisink, Orange county, New York. He was married to Geertruy Matthysen Nieuwkirk in about 1692 in New York.

(19) Cornelius Brink (1697)
(17) Lambert Huybertsen (Brink) (18) Pieter Lambertsen Brink (1670)

Cornelius was born on 25 July 1697 in Kingston. He married Maria Cool (Kool) on 14 December 1724. She was christened on 20 June 1708 at the Kingston Dutch Reformed Church, Ulster County, New York. Her parents were Harom Kool and Cornelia Vanleuven. The Kools (Cools) had been in America since before 1647.

(20) Elizabeth Brink (1732)
(17) Lambert Huybertsen (Brink) (18) Pieter Lambertsen Brink (1670) (19) Cornelius Brink (1697)

She was christened on 29 October 1732 in Kingston township, Ulster county, New York, or was born about 1732 in Walpack township, Sussex county, New Jersey, depending on your sources. She first married Bernardus Swartwout Jr. on 24 December 1753 in the Walpack Dutch Reformed Church, New Jersey. He died in 1768. She then married Thomas Heysham.


The Dutch in the Delaware Valley

In the 1690s the western part of what is now Orange County, New York, as well as a 40-mile section of the Delaware River from present day Stroudsburg, Pennyslvania, north to Port Jervis, New York, was known as the Minesink. This name, Indian in origin, was given to this area by the Dutch and the Swedes who first settled it. Some say it refers to the zinc mines, while others say it refers to the Indians who lived there. Thomas and Bernardus Swartwout are named on the first land patent for the area.

The settlers would cross back and forth across the Delaware River from New Jersey, where it was already fairly well civilized and where a road had been built connecting the region to New York, to the Pennsylvania side. It was common for settlers to live in New Jersey and have their farm in Pennsylvania. It was not until the end of the Revolution that the Indian threat on the Pennsylvania side of the river subsided.


The Swartwout Family

Also as Swartworth, Swarthwout, Swartwoot and Swartwood.

(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634)

He was born on 1 June 1634 in Amersterdam, Noord Holland, the Netherlands. He married Eva Albertsen Bradt.

(18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634)

He was born on 11 May 1664 in Wiltwyck, Ulster county, New York. He married Jannetje Jacobus Coobes. The Swartwout family had acquired a patent for land in the northern end of the Minisinck, in an area today known as Deerpark, from the Governor of New York in 1697.

(19) Bernardus Swartwout Sr. (1697)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664)

He was born on 31 October 1697 in Kingston, Ulster county, New York. He married Grietje Decker. This is in the counties of Orange and Ulster. Bernardus died on 24 March 1774 in Lehman township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania. He had writeen a will on 7 June 1773:

“In the name of God Amen. I Bernardus Swartsworth [sic] of the township of Delaware in the County of Northampton of the Province of Pennsylvania, Yeoman, being weak in body but of sound disposing mind and memory (blessed by God therefore) do this day being the seventh of June in the year of our Lord Christ one thousand seven hundred and seventy-three make and publish this my last will and testament in manner and form following (that is to say) . . .

Item I give and bequeath unto the five sons of my beloved son, Bernardus Swartsworth [sic], deceased, to wit Samuel, Anthony, Benjamin, Moses, and Geradus, twenty pounds Proclamation to each and every one of them severally; to be paid to them by my executors as they and each of them shall arrive to the age of twenty-one years. To Samuel twenty pounds, to Anthony twenty pounds, to Benjamin twenty pounds, to Moses twenty pounds, and to Geradus twenty pounds. And in case any one or more of the last mentioned brethren die under age, then my will is that the surviving brothers share and share alike . . .

Lastly I do hereby nominate and appoint and by these processes constitute and ordain my well beloved friends Mr. John Depue and Mr. Benjamin Depue my sole and only executors to this my last will and testament recommending to them the assistance to my good friends Mr. John Brink and Mr. Manual Gonsalin as proper persons to be aiding and advising in the process to whom I shall appoint as overseers to take care that this my last will and testament be actually fulfilled according to the true intent and meaning thereof in witness whereof I the said Bernardus Swarthsworth have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day month and year first above written
his
Berbardus B Swartsworth
mark”
Notice that Manuel Gonsales was listed as a "good friend."

(20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr. (1728)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697)

The first husband of Elizabeth Brink. Bernardus, the younger, was born on 28 January 1727 in Kingston (or Rochester), Ulster county, New York (some sources say New Jersey), the son of Bernardus Swartwout Sr. and Grietje Decker. He married Lisabeth Brinck [sic] on 24 December 1753 in the Walpack Dutch Reformed Church, New Jersey. He died in 1768. Bernardus did not leave a will so his wife, Elizabeth Brink along with Jacob Swartwood, her brother-in law, and the eldest surviving son of Bernardus Swartwout Sr, filed for and were issued Letters of Administration to probate his estate. The total value came to 53 pounds, 16 shillings & 8 pence. Their boys changed the spelling of their names to Swartwood (Anglicizing it). After Bernardus’ death, Elizabeth married Thomas Heysham. Thomas then raised the Swartwood boys.

The children of Bernardus and Elizabeth were Samuel, Anthony, Benjamin, Moses, Gerardus, and, I think, Levi.

(21) Samuel Swartwood (1754)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr. (1728)

He was born in about 1754 in Lehman Township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania. There is a Samuel Swartwood in the General Muster Roll of the Eighth company, 6th Battalion of the Pennsylvania Militia of 14 May 1778.

(21) Anthony Swartwood (1756)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr.

He was born in about 1756 in Lehman Township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania. An Anthony Swartwood is listed as a Private in the Muster Roll in the Second Battalion of Associators in the County of Northampton and Province of Pennsylvania which is to component part of the Flying Camp of ten thousand men commanded by Colonel Hart and in Captain Henry Hagenbuch's Company 6 August 1776 at Perth Amboy. This was the same unit that William & Abner Heysham were in. From Perth Amboy the unit marched into the Battle of Long Island.

(21) Benjamin Swartwood (1758)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr.

He was born in about 1758 in Lehman township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania. He died on 3 January 1776 [some sources claim 1778], a casualty of the Revolutionary War, probably while imprisoned in New York City according to Davis's 1877 "History of Northampton Co, PA." He appears to have fought at the battles of Long Island and Fort Washington in Captain Rundio's Company. William & Abner Heysham were taken prisoner at the same time and held in the prison hulks in the bay. Abner probably also died in captivity.

(21) Moses Swartwood (1761)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr.

He was born on 14 March 1761 in Lehman township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania (other sources indicate Walpack, New Jersey). He was in the pay roll of Captain Christopher Keller's company of the Fifth Battalion of the Northampton County Militia commanded by Colonel Nicolas Kern on the expedition to the Wyoming Valley [Luzerne county] in August 1784. John Heysham may have been as well.

He married Mary Magdalena Arnold in about 1786. A Moses Swartwout was listed as a Federal pensioner living in Pennsylvania in 1820. He died on 11 September 1844 in Upper Mount Bethel, Northampton county, Pennsylvania.

(21) Gerardus Swartwood (1766)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr.

He was born on 24 May 1766 in Lehman township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania (others, based on the below, say Walpack, New Jersey). He was christened in the Dutch Reformed Church, Walpack township, Sussex county, New Jersey.

(21) Levi Swartwoot (c1767)
(17) Roeloff (Tomys) Swartwout (1634) (18) Antoni Thomas Swartwout (1664) (19) Bernardus Swartwout (1697) (20) Bernardus Swartwout, Jr.

He was cited in David Heysham's Declaration for a Pension as a stepson of Thomas Heysham. Not otherwise listed as a child of Bernardus Jr. Was he so young at the time of his grandfather's death that he was overlooked in the will? He was cited in the baptismal records of the Reformed Dutch Church of Smithfield on 5 April 1793 - A Levi Swartout and his wife, Rachel White, had their daughter, Mary, christened. There were no witnesses. More importantly, on 16 June 1791 Levi Swartwood and his wife, Rachel White, had their daughter, Elizabeth, christened. Witnesses were Thomas Heysham and Elizabeth Brink.

Levi apparently followed his step-brothers, John, Thomas and David Heysham, to Westmoreland county. In the 1800 census of Mount Pleasant, Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania as Levi Swartwood, 26 to 44 years old [1756-1774]. Levi was, perhaps, 33 at the time.

In the 1810 census of East Huntingdon, Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania as Levi Swartwood, 45 and over. In the 1820 census of Tate township, Clermont county, Ohio as Levi Swartwood [Smallwood in Ancestry.com]. In the 1830 census of Jackson township, Monroe county, Ohio as Levi Swathwood. Monroe county is just across the river from Tyler county, West Virginia. In the 1840 census of Perry township, Monroe county, Ohio as Levi Swartwood [Smartwood in Ancestry.com].


Historical Timeline: Colonial America
1754-1763 French & Indian War. For the settlers these wars meant an increase in the severity of Indian raids. In the Treaty of Paris the French gave up all of their territory east of the Mississippi to England.
1760 Population of American colonies reaches 1.5 million.

In the aftermath of the French & Indian Wars England and their American colonies begin to drift apart. The British government was consumed by the need to pay off their massive war debt while the Americans, no longer needing protection against the French, became less and less inclined to defer to British interests and concerns.

Thomas Hesom supported the American views opposing England in the runup to the Revolution and was described by his son as "a violent Whig."

While Pennsylvania had initially looked for volunteers for the rebellion, the supply of eager young men rapidly dried up. The militia law of March 1777 required all adult males, 18 to 53, to join and attend musters. In 1777 Thomas Sr. would have been about 57, so it is no surprise that his name was not on the militia lists. Pennsylvania historical society records do show that Thomas' sons, John, William, Abner, Thomas Jr. and David, served as Revolutionary War soldiers, either at the front or as Indian fighters on the frontier.

After the war there existed a pent-up demand for new land and westward migration. In a letter dated 24 April 1783, a Thomas Hissam was included in a list of Householders in Wyoming [a valley in Pennsylvania up the Susquehanna river, only 60 miles from Lower Smithfield] who wished to support the laws of Pennsylvania. A separate list shows those who supported the laws of Connecticut. This reflected the continuing issue with residents from Connecticut who claimed the valley for their state. Which Thomas was this, our Thomas or his son? Note that David, Thomas Sr.'s youngest son, lived in Luzerne county, the location of the Wyoming valley, from about 1795 to 1798. On one list, in "The Susquehannah Company Papers," Thomas' name was transcribed as Hissam and on another as Hassham.

The Federal Tax of 1785 for Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county for married freemen.

Heysham, Thomas, 350 acres, 2 horses, 2 cattle, 0 sheep, 1.8.2 tax
. . .
Heysham, Thomas, Jun'r, 0 acres, 0 horses, 2 cattle, 0 sheep, 1.6 tax
Interestingly, Thomas and Thomas Jr. are not together on the list that otherwise appears to be alphabetical. Thomas Jr. was amongst the names appended to the end of the list, almost as an afterthought. David was probably still living at home at this time, not marrying until 1786. Was John already living in New Jersey by this time?

The 1786 Federal Tax for Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county for married freemen shows,

"Hisham, Thomas, 100 acres, 1 horse, 3 cattle, 0 sheep, 7.2 tax
. . .
Hisham, Thomas, Jun'r., 0 acres, 0 horses, 2 cattle, 0 sheep, 1.2 tax" - from "Proprietary, Supply, and State Tax Lists of the Counties of Northampton and Northumberland for the Years 1772 to 1787" by Northampton County (Pa.)
That's a big drop, from 350 to 100 acres. 1786 was the year that David married and he was probably still living with his father at the time the tax was recorded.

The 1788 Federal Tax for Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county for married freemen shows

"Hissom, Thomas, 0 acres, 2 horses, 1 cow, 2.3 tax
Hissom, Thomas, Ju'r., 100 acres, 2 horses, 1 cow, 5.5 tax
Hissom, David, 0 acres, 1 horse, 1 cow, 1.8 tax" - from "Proprietary, Supply, and State Tax Lists of the Counties of Northampton and Northumberland for the Years 1772 to 1787" by Northampton County (Pa.)
Had Thomas Sr. given his land to Thomas Jr? Again, was John living in New Jersey?

On 29 August 1788 Thomas Heysham and Elizabeth Brink were witnesses to the baptism of grandchildren James Heysham Sullivan, the son of Daniel Sullivan and Elizabeth Heysham, and Joab Heysham, the son of David Heysham and Elizabeth Bush, at the Smithfield church. There were a total of 12 baptisms done that day.

The Pennsylvania Archives, Third Series, Vol. 26 (Northampton County) shows a Thomas Hysham with 100 acres. Date of Survey: March 13, 1789. It is not clear, but, based on the above, this was probably Thomas Jr.

In 1790 the first Federal census was held. Thomas Hysham and his sons, Thomas Jur., John and David, were listed as living in separate households in Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county. In Thomas' household were 2 men over 16, 1 boy under 16, and 3 women. The woman just above Thomas, Rachel Vancampen, had two slaves. I had previously misread the record thinking Thomas had those slaves. Thomas' other known sons, William and Abner, died during the Revolution at the Battle of Long Island.

Slavery in Pennsylvania

While not wide spread north of the Blue Mountains, slavery had existed in the Delaware valley since its settlement by the Dutch in the 1600's. Its later Quaker settlers were also not adverse to slave-holding, at least initially. However, worried by the propriety of owning another person and not wanting to appear worldly, by 1758 the Yearly Meeting had proclaimed that slave-ownership to be a bar to membership and in 1774 made it a cause for disowning. In 1778 serious discussions of aboliton began.

"Easton, Northampton County, Sept. 13, 1779. Committed to this Gaol, the 8th inst. William Sisko, a mulatto, who says he belongs to James Byers, living in Paxton Township, Lancaster County. His Master is therefore desired to come, pay the Charges, and take him away. Peter Ehler, Gaoler." - from an advertisement in "The Pennsylvania Gazette," September 15, 1779.
The pace of events was accelerated by the fact that slavery had never been a large part of the Pennsylvania economy and just did "not work" in the wheat growing regions of the state. A gradual emancipation act for Pennsylvania was passed in 1780. It did not free the slaves, but set the state on a course to be free of slavery in 28 years. On a more positive note, the law did immediately raise all restrictions, except the right to vote, from free blacks in the state.

On 16 June 1791 Thomas Heysham and Elizabeth Brink were witnesses at the baptism of their grandchild, Elizabeth Swartwood, the daughter of Levi Swartwood and Rachel White, at the Smithfield church. Their were no witnesses at the baptism of Levi Swartwood's next child, Mary, on 5 April 1793, which may imply the death of Thomas and Elizabeth before that time.

In 1793 there were two Thomas Heysham Jr.’s listed in "Warrantees of Land in the County of Northampton," both for 400 acres, but no Thomas Sr. The date of this survey was 26 February 1793. The repetition could be a misprint or mis-transcription. The use of Jr. implies that a Sr. was still living, though it might also mean a very recent decease.

Thomas Heysham Sr. was not noted in the 1800 Federal census; only David Hysham was in still living in Northampton county at that time, while both John and Thomas Jr. had moved to Westmoreland county, in western Pennsylvania.

Life in Early America

The early pioneers were a restless group, pulling up stakes frequently, continually moving westward in search of new land and greater opportunity. When they looked for a place to settle, they usually chose a heavily wooded plot. The belief at the time was that open, unforested land indicated poor soil. If trees didn’t, or wouldn’t, grow there, then the soil must be bad. The western prairies, now home to vast wheat and corn fields, where then called a desert for this reason. This choice dictated that the first few years on a site were filled with the backbreaking work of clearing the forest.

In the first year a section of trees was felled and a small crop of corn was planted amongst the stumps to provide a minimum of food for the family over the next winter. On the next year stumps could be cleared, the roots having begun to rot. Slowly a man could begin to clear enough land to produce a surplus for sale. In the Middle Colonies they grew wheat, barley, oats, rye, and corn. After a home and outbuildings were built, and the necessary fences were in place, most of the felled trees were burned, there being no ready market or way of transporting the logs.

American's were considered to be poor farmers by visiting Europeans. The American method of farming resulted from the differences in land value with the Old World. There land was expensive and labor was relatively cheap, so great effort was put into 'scientific' farming to increase and preserve the land's output. The aristocrats of the era took a great interest in modern methods and even King George III took pride in his farming. In America, in contrast, nothing was so plentiful, or so cheap, as land while labor was scarce and expensive, so little effort was put into preserving the land. After some years of intensive farming the land was played-out and the settlers moved on.

Wildlife was plentiful. Men hunted deer and smaller game without the restrictions of the Forest Laws of the Old World. Birds, such as pheasant and turkey, were also available in abundance. One report noted flights of pigeons so large that they darkened the sky and flew so low that men could knock them from the air with a stick. The early settlers also harvested fish from the sea and from streams. Brodhead creek was and is an excellent trout stream. Oysters were available in such abundance that they were considered a “poor man’s” dish.

Outside the few large cities, most houses were constructed of unsplit logs, made plentiful with the clearing of the land. They were rude dwellings with dirt floors and, unless the chinks were carefully filled, often drafty.

The women were always industrious. A woman's place was in the home, but it was a huge and necessary job. A man might marry for love, but he could not effectively run a farm without the aid of a wife. In addition to caring for the younger children, the wife maintained a vegetable garden and a flock of chickens, churned the butter, made all the meals [and in this era 'from scratch' meant milling the flour and plucking the chicken], spun and wove linen and woolen, sewed new clothes, mended torn items, washed the clothes by either beating them against stones in the river or using a simple washboard and tub, and saw to the family's moral upbringing. There were no hours when her hands were not busy. The idea that "cleanliness was next to godliness" was, in part, recognition of how hard cleanliness was to achieve.

For the common diet, milk and bread, and a pie, formed the breakfast meal, and good pork or bacon, and a wheat-flour pudding or dumplings, with butter and molasses were given for dinner. Mush, or hominy, with milk and butter, and honey, formed the supper. Chocolate was only occasionally procured and used with maple sugar.

When wheat and rye grew thick and tall on new land, and all was ready to be cut with sickles, the men, and many of the women and older chidlren, entered the fields. About twenty acres of wheat could be cut and shocked in half a day.

Rum was the common beverage. A bottle was handed about at all venues, each taking his draw from the neck of it, by a swallow or more. At weddings, and even at funerals, mixed and stewed rum, called spirits, was an expected and common entertainment. Rum was even put on toasted bread occasionally. Beer and ale were also brewed, often at home. Taverns were uncommon in the country. George Washington had his own favorite recipe for the beer he brewed at Mount Vernon.

The first settlers were accustomed to wear a strong and coarse dress, such as buckskin. It was used for both breeches and jackets. As times became more settled oznaburg cloth, made of hemp tow and flax, began to be used for shirts and coarse tow for knee-breeches. Stockings of cotton were usually worn with knee breeches, but farmers and other laborers usually protected these costly items with leggings of burlap or leather. By 1790 trousers were replacing knee-breeches. Most of these clothes were colorless. Dyes made from sumac berries or the hulls of walnuts or butternuts were available, but produced only a limited range of rust, brown or yellow grey colors. These were referred to as drab, snuff, liver or sad-color. The Colonial tri-cornered hat was seldom worn in the country. The English round hat of felt with a wide brim provided better protection from sun and rain and was to endure as the familiar slouch hat.

Thomas and Catherine had the following children:
(21) Mary "Molly" Heysham (1745)
(21) John Hisson (1746)
(21) Ann Hesson (1748)
(21) Thomas Hissom (1750)
(21) Abner Hissom (1752)
(21) William Hissom (1754)
(21) Elizabeth Heysham (c1756)
(21) David Heysham/Hissem (1762)

(21) Mary "Molly" Heysham (1745)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687) (20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)

In the fall of 1759 British troops under the command of Sir William Johnson captured the French Fort at Niagara after a long siege. Inside they found:

"Heysham, Molly. Made captive "at the Blue Mountains," probably in Virginia [sic], about 1755. She was found at Fort Niagara, with numerous other prisoners, when it surrendered to the British, July 25, 1759, and was no doubt sent to New York, by way of Oswego, with the other rescued prisoners of the French and the surrendered garrison, which included a number of French women and children." - from Publications of the Buffalo N.Y. Historical Society.
She was carried off in 1755 when the first raids of the French and Indian War hit the Brodhead creek area, which, of course, is in the Blue Mountains of Pennsylvania. Assuming she was born 9 months after her parents married, she could have been as old as 10 at the time of her capture, or 14 when finally released. This would probably be the minimum age at which she could have been described as a "young woman" vice a child. The captives had been used as servants and laborers by the French and Indians of the fort. There is no other evidence for Molly's existence so it cannot be determined whether she ever saw her folks again, but it was a long way back to Smithfield through hostile Indian territory, in the middle of a war that was to last 4 more years. I suspect she married a nice young man and settled down where she was.

Note that Molly was a common English nickname for Mary. That she was known in this instance by the name Heysham perhaps indicates that a British officer wrote down her name. That is, a man familiar with the way the surname was then spelled in England, vice the way Mary's family spelled it at that time.

Molly

In England if the original name contained an "r" it was common for the nickname to contain an "l." Hence, Prince Harold was known as Prince Hal, Sarah became Sally and Mary was Molly, or Moll.

A second meaning for Moll is as a disreputable woman. As early as 1604 it was a synonym for prostitute and a moll house was a term for a brothel. Daneil Defoe's novel, "Moll Flanders," perhaps picked up on this shady connotation in the name for his loose-living heroine.


(21) Ann Hesson (1748)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687) (20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)

A daughter of Thomas Heysham. She was christened on 30 October 1748 in the Dutch Reformed Church at Walpack, New Jersey. She was referred to in church records as Ann, the daughter of Thomas Hesson and Catherina Kleyn. Witnesses were Dirk Kermer and Jacomyntje Keyser, syn Huys vr. [wife of …] - from "The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record." Ann married unknown and no children are known.

**Dirk Kermer was baptised on 23 May 1697 in the Kingston Reformed Dutch Church, Ulster, New York. He married Eva Schoonhoven on 24 October 1719. She appears to have died sometime between 1726 and 1748 (Eva’s mother was Cornelia Swartout – small world). He then married Jacomyntjr Keyser, who was the daughter of Jacob Keyser and Marytje de Lange. She was born in 1709. The Keyser’s were Swedish and the de Lange’s were Dutch. All of these families lived in Marbleton and Ulster, New York, but were part of the Minisinck Reformed Dutch Church.

(21) Abner Hissom (1752)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687) (20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)

Abner was born in about 1752 in Lower Smithfield township, Northampton county, Pennsylvania. His name was not entered in the Walpack Reformed Dutch church register, as it was for his older brother, John, and younger brother, William. This may be because he was baptized at one of the other churches in the region. A single traveling minister served four churches in the Minisinck valley and, I presume, children were baptized where and when he was available. The Pennsylvania archives lists an Abner Hissom, born in Pennsylvania is 175?. There are similar entries for Thomas and William Hissom.

Like his brothers, I assume that Abner got an education in farming, animal husbandry and woodcraft from his father. Any formal schooling he may have received would have been severely limited. He may have been able to read and write, and do simple sums; nothing else was really necessary. His political education in these increasingly turbulent times would have occurred at church and in the tavern. Frontier farmers, used to making their own way, had lost the automatic deference for authority their forefathers had in England - no one was tugging his forelock as the lord road by.

There was also conflict within the colony that fueled revolutionary feeling. The Quakers of Philadelphia and the southern counties had ruled the colony for generations. In great part this was due to gerrymandering. The northern counties, settled mainly by Dutch, Scotch-Irish, and German Calvinists, had not been granted the same number of representatives in the Assembly as the southern counties, though they had an equal population. The "northerners" were resentful and saw the impending revolution as a chance to get around the Quaker dominated Assembly by going directly to the Continental Congress.

The other complaint with the Quakers was their pacifism. The Assembly repeatedly refused to grant the funds needed raise a militia to defend the frontier. The northern counties, forced to defend themselves against Indian attack without the Assembly's help, resented the "free-ride" the southern counties got from their military actions. This resentment flared during the Revolution when Quakers refused to aid the patriots and traded, as neutrals, with the enemy.

A year of violent confrontations in 1775 between colonists and the British army, mainly centered in Massachusetts, had roused the populace. Fault lines were now clearly apparent in support for the crown with Northampton county a hotbed of Whigish sympathies. The demand for equal representation found a ready audience in the county which gained a reputation for radicalism.

The newly signed Declaration of Independence was being read to the public and it galvanized support for the Revolution. George Washington, commanding General of the Continental army, put out a call for troops and asked that a "flying camp" of 10,000 men be created as a mobile reserve.

The Flying Camp

In June 1776 General Washington appealed to the Continental Congress for more troops. He wanted a 10,000 man strategic mobile reserve, or Flying Camp. The term Flying Camp was a literal translantion of the French camp volant. On 3 June 1776 the Continental Congress resolved, "That a flying camp be immediately established in the middle colonies." The Northampton Flying Camp were “special battalions of Pennsylvania Line troops recruited from the Pennsylvania Associators.” Other militia units from New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia also created Flying Camps. Their duties would include protecting their state from invasion, protecting the Continental Army's supply lines, suppressing roving bands of Tories and acting as a ready reserve should Washington have need of reinforcements.

Pennsylvania sent some 2,000 Associators, many of who were quickly drafted into service by General Washington for the defense of New York. Of the Pennsylvania men, Heckman writes, “…some of these had seen service in border Indian warfare, and all of them were frontier hunters and sharpshooters…” Gallagher describes the Pennsylvania long rifle as the “preferred weapon of farmers,” who “could hit a target the size of a deer’s brain at 150 yards.” Experience gave the British great respect for the effective range of this showpiece of Pennsylvania German technology, some fearing to expose themselves to American riflemen at anything less than 300 yards.

The Flying Camp had a brief but eventful existence. It was fraught with difficulties almost from its inception and, never realizing its full potential, was disbanded by the end of November 1776, shortly after the fall of Fort Washington. For more information, see Dr. Francis E. Devine’s “The Pennsylvania Flying Camp, July-November 1776,” in the magazine Pennsylvania History (46: January 1979, pages 59-78).


The Associators

Pennsylvania had no militia. The Quakers who originally founded the colony were by religion opposed to violence of any kind and would not authorize a colonially funded military. The Military Association, or "Battalion of Associators," was an invention of Benjamin Franklin created to act as a militia to defend Philadelphia against privateers, in 1747, and Indians during the French & Indian wars.

In 1774 the people of Pennsylvania were ordered to prepare for the worst. They started organizing companies for military use, and enlisting and drilling volunteers between the ages of 16 and 50. The Associators were the militia of Northampton county, existing before a Militia Act was finally enacted in 1777. The website of the Pennsylvania State Archives describes the Associators as “volunteers who comprised the Military Association, a civilian reserve designed to repel any invasion of Pennsylvania . . ."

The Association collapsed in the aftermath of the New York campaign and was replaced on the state level by a militia in 1777.

Abner and William Hissom, below, enlisted as privates in Captain Timothy Jayne's company of the First Battalion of Associators in the County of Northampton. This was some months after their brother, Thomas, had joined the Pennsylvania Rifle Regiment. The Northampton battalion was under the command of Johann Peter Kichlein. From the Pennsylvania Archives, Revolutionary War Military Abstract Card File:

"Private Abner Hissom, Active Duty, Line, Flying Camp (Northampton), Captain Timothy Jayne's Company, 1st Battalion, Time of Service: 9 July 1776"
Abner's enlistment was probably for a period of 6 months; most of the Pennsylvania Flying Camp enlistments expired on 1 December 1776. Note that his brother, Thomas, had signed up with the rifle regiment until January 1778. The Northampton county battalion never attained more than half-strength.

Johann Peter Kichlein

His last name is rendered as Kachline, Kechline, Kichline and Kichlein. Known as Peter, he was born in Nassau, Weilberg, Germany in 1722. He attended the University of Heidelberg before coming to America in 1742 and settling in Northampton county, Pennsylvania. He was a member of the Committee of Safety and of the first Constitutional Convention, and, later, was was chief burgess of Easton, Pennsylvania, where he died in 1789.

He commanded the Northampton Battalion of the Flying Camp at the Battle of Long Island, where they covered the retreat of the Continental forces, and saved the army from capture. He was wounded and captured, and was not exchanged until 1778. "One writer has said that 'Long Island was the Thermopylae of the American Revolution, and the Pennsylvania Germans were its Spartans.' He forgot to add that Colonel Kichlein was its Leonidas."

From "The Muster Rolls and Papers Relating to the Associators and Militia of the County of Northampton" -
County Lieutenants
John Weitzel . . . 16 May 1777
Peter Kechlein . . . 30 March 1780

Committe of Observation, chosen 21 December 1774
. . . Peter Kechline *also Standing Committee of Correspondence for the county.

Associators, 1775
Easton Company
Captain, Peter Kechlein, 22 May 1775
Lower Smithfield Company
Captain, Jacob Stroud, 22 May 1775
Lieutenant, Samuel Drake
Total rank and file, 127 men


Captain Timothy Jayne

Timothy Jayne, of Northampton, Pennsylvania formed the Kaltius Battalion during the Revolutionary War. He had 49 members in his company, all of whom were supposedly captured at Fort Washington, with only eighteen of them returning, the others having died on the Jersey prison ship. Captain Jayne was exchanged on 8 December 1776 and was commanding a Northampton militia company in 1778.

By the end of July the companies of the Flying Camp had begun their march, passing through eastern Pennsylvania to Easton, where they joined under the command of Colonel Kechline. Captain Timothy Jayne’s company was drawn up at New Brunswick, New Jersey on 27 July 1776, where the other units soon joined them.

"Muster Roll in the First Battalion of Associators in the County of Northampton, & Province of Pennsylvania, which is to compose part of the Flying Camp of Ten Thousand Men, Commanded by Col. Hart, and in Capt. Timothy Jayne's Company, July 27th, 1776, at Brunswick.
. . .
Privates
Abner Hissom
William Hissom"
"It would seem that the other companies in Kichline’s battalion arrived a little later. Nagel, of Kern’s company, says that after reaching Easton, “in a few days [they] crossed the Delaware, and marched to New Brunswick, where they arrived on Saturday evening, and left on Monday, and from thence they marched by way of Amboy…” Hagenbuch’s company arrived in Perth Amboy at least as early as 6 August . . . " - from "Samuel Wirth: Historical Information".

From New Jersey, the men were transferred, piece-meal, to Manhattan and then on to Long Island, some of them not reaching the island until 26 August, the day before the Battle of Long Island. For the battle, the American force were divided into five divisions, with Kechline's Associators assigned to General Sullivan's division. “John Sullivan… commanded a division composed of Lord Stirling’s brigade — one Maryland regiment, one from Delaware, a Pennsylvania rifle regiment [Miles’ - to which Thomas Hissom, Abner's brother, belonged], a Pennsylvania musketry battalion [Atlee’s], and three corps of Pennsylvania militia… Up to a short time before the battle, Sullivan’s [division was] posted in and about the city.” Their encampment was below Brooklyn, some two miles south towards Staten Island.

The Battle of Long Island

The British landed on Long Island on 22 August and from that date until the main battle there were serious daily skirmishes involving Pennsylvania riflemen. The Americans actually fought quite effectively in these skirmishes and caused a fair amount of trouble, especially to the Hessians at Flatbush. A Hessian officer involved in this skirmishing said of the Pennsylvania riflemen, “[they] have some very good marksmen, but some of them have wretched guns, and most of them shoot crooked. But they are clever at hunter’s wiles. They climb trees, they crawl forward on their bellies for one hundred and fifty paces, shoot, and go as quickly back again. They make themselves shelters of boughs, etc.”

The Americans formed a line on high ground some distance in front of heavy fortificatons they had built on Brooklyn Heights.

The British plan of battle was to heavily engage, and hold in place, the middle and right of the American line, where Kechline's forces were located. British scouts had discovered that the American left was not secure so, while the Americans were thus engaged, the majority of the British army would swing around the American's left, flanking them to fall on the American rear. The Battle of Long Island began on 27 August 1776 and, as contemporaries noted, the American's got a “drubbing” and were “prettily taken in.”

The battle began early with a surprise pre-dawn attack by the British. The Pennsylvania rife men fought well, displaying great markmanship and even withstanding withering fire in open positions, but the British were not really interested in forcing the Amerrican line. The outcome was determined when the British successfully entered upon the American rear and caused a panic. The "History of Lehigh County" states that “…there was great danger of the annihilation of the greater part of the American forces, when Kichlein’s men, with part of Lutz’s and Atlee’s commands stemmed the tide sufficiently to allow the demoralized troops to rally under the guns of General Putnam’s fortifications [at Brooklyn Heights].”

Once the Americans had fought their way back to their fortifications in the Brooklyn Heights area, the battle subsided because General Howe hesitated to storm these positions. Some have suggested that this hesitation was directly attributable to the catastrophic outcome of just such a head-on attack on the fortified positions at Bunker Hill. There the British attackers had been repeatedly mowed down in shocking numbers and were only able to take the American positions when the defenders’ gunpowder ran out.

On 29 August, General George Washington effected a brilliant, Dunkirk-like evacuation under cover of darkness and fog, recruiting boats from sympathetic locals and removing all of his surviving troops (approximately 10,000!) across the East River to Manhattan. The plan was betrayed at the last minute by Tories who observed the evacuation and sent a servant to inform the British. But British troops arrived only in time to fire a few desperate shots at the last boat disappearing into the fog. Legend has it that Washington himself was the last man to leave.

Kichlein and at least two of his four captains, Henry Hagenbuch and Timothy Jayne, were captured during the battle. Another, John Arndt, was wounded. Hagenbuch and Jayne were later released, on 8 December 1776, in a prisoner exchange.

For more on the battle, see Samuel Wirth: Historial Information.

A deposition by a soldier in Kern's company describes the last frantic moments of the battle on Long Island,

"at about four o’clock in the afternoon his Colonel [Kechline], who was commanding on foot, collected about two hundred of them together and had their arms put in order, for we were in a hollow, and the enemy on a hill. He said he would break through their lines and escape to New York. When we got about half way up the hill, the fire of the British came so hard, and so many fell, that the Colonel ordered a retreat. In a few minutes he was taken prisoner, and we all fled in confusion into some briars and high grass, along a pond. About sunset the British and Hessians came upon us and took us prisoners."
From the Pennsylvania Archives is a note, undated, from Captain Timothy Jayne,
"The following were taken in the Battle of Long Island prisoners, belonging to my company . . .
William Hissom,
Abner Hissom . . ."
But does this mean taken prisoner on Long Island itself, or in the campaign, which included the Battle of Fort Washington and the loss of Manhattan? Note that Captain Jayne himself was taken prisoner on Long Island. He was released in a prisoner exchange on 8 December 1776, after the fall of Fort Washington, thus escaping his men's fate. Who then took the muster of William and Abner's absence? There were many gruesome tales of Americans being bayonetted after surrendering.

The Pennsylvania Associators were amongst the last American troops to quit the field for the safety of the Brooklyn fortifications. It is possible that William and Abner Hissom were taken at this time too. To the contrary are the sources that claim that Timothy Jayne "had 49 members in his company, all of whom were supposedly captured at Fort Washington, with only eighteen of them returning, the others having died on the Jersey prison ship. "

A number of Kechline's men did make it behind American lines and took part in the evacuation. After the battle General Washington ordered Kechline's Battalion to be joined with Colonel Hand's 1st Pennsylvania battalion. The unit never regained its strength or independent identity. Eventually the remnants of Kechline's four companies were placed under Colonel Baxter and attached to Hart's Battalion. They garrisoned Fort Washington, on Manhattan. I think the following goes here. From "The Muster Rolls and Papers Relating to the Associators and Militia of the County of Northampton":

Flying Camp, Northampton County Battalion:
Colonel, [Joseph] Hart
Lieutenant Colonel, Peter Kechlein, 17 July 1776
1st Battalion, led by Colonel Hart
- 1st Company - Captain John Arndt, 9 July 1776, total men, 92. Of the 1st Battalion.
- 4th Company - Captain Timothy Jayne, 9 July 1776. Of the 1st Battalion. 1st Lt Peter Middaugh, 2nd Lt Benjamin Ennis, Ens Abner Everitt, total men, 49

2nd Battalion, led by Lieutenant Colonel Kechlein
- 2nd Company - Captain Henry Hagenbuck, 9 July 1776, total men, 120. Of the 2nd Battalion.
- 3rd Company - Captain Nicholas Kern [Horn?], 9 July 1776, total men, 57. Of the 2nd Battalion.

Here's an interesting note,

"This minute," Colonel Joseph Hart reported from Perth Amboy, New Jersey, on September 2, 1776, to Pennsylvania's Council of Safety, "I received information . . . that there was two or three companies of the Third Battalion in said county [Bucks] commanded by Colonel Kichline who do not intend to march forward in defence of their country." - from "The Day is Ours!" by William M. Dwyer.
This sounds very similar to the mutiny of units of the Pennsylvania Rifle Regiment.

The Battle of Fort Washington

After the defeat in Long Island the issue still remained whether to attempt to hold Manhattan in the face of the British Fleet. Failing to make the correct decision in time, it was soon too late to safely remove the garrison. Fort Washington commanded the highest point on Manhattan and most of the remnants of the Northampton County associators had been positioned there. During the battle the Northampton county men, under Colonel Baxter, initially fought outside the fort, behind earthworks on high ground about half a mile to the east. Greatly outnumbered in the British attack, they were driven back to the fort and Colonel Baxter was killed.

In the end their position was hopeless. Under continuous bombardment and outnumbered 15 to 1, their commander finally surrendered the fort.

Abner's younger brother, Thomas, was also at the battle of Long Island. After the war he joined Captain Jayne and others in requesting reimbursement from the Pennsylvania government for the 'loss of arms' at Fort Washington. It is not clear whose arms these were. They could have been Thomas' or those of his brothers. Note that in this early period all American soldiers would have carried personal firearms, not government issue. However, this seems to indicate that at least one of the three brothers was at the fort.

The Moravian records, at Bethlehem, contain the following about the Flying Camp's experience at Long Island:

"In these days, parties of militia on their return from New York, passed, bringing the intelligence that a battalion from the county [Lieut. Col. Kechlein], had suffered severely at the engagement with the British on Long Island, on the 27th of August last, having left most of its men either dead or wounded."

(21) William Hissom (1754)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687) (20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)

William, the son of Thomas Hisson and Catherina Kleyn, was christened on 19 May 1754 in the Dutch Reformed Church, Walpack, Sussex county, New Jersey. Witnesses were Johannes Kleyn and Eva Brink - from "The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record." I assume Johannes was related to Catherina, William's mother; perhaps her brother?

Sussex county

This is in northwestern New Jersey, between Warren county, to the south, and New York, to the north. Its western border is the Delaware river. It is part of the Minisinck Valley.

Why was William, and his brother John, christened in Walpack, across the river from Smithfield township? Did Catherina return to a church closer to the rest of her extended family for these important rites? Another proposed solution is that, as a traveling minister supported several churches in the area, this baptism was conducted in Walpack because that’s where the minister was at the time.

The Pennsylvania archives also lists a William Hissom, birthdate 175?. There are similar entries for a Thomas and Abner Hissom.

Most of the information that applies to Abner, above, applies equally to his brother. They served togehter in the Northampton Battalion of the Flying Camp. From the Pennsylvania Archives, Revolutionary War Military Abstract Card File:

- Private William Hissom, Active Duty, Line, Flying Camp (Northampton), Captain Timothy Jayne, 1st Battalion, Time of Service: 9 July 1776.
William is also on a Muster Roll of the First Battalion of Associators in the county of Northampton, 'which is to compose part of the Flying Camp of Ten Thousand Men,' Commanded by Colonel Hart and in Captain Timothy Jayne's company, 27 July 1776, at New Brunswick.

I wonder why William's brother, Thomas, didn't join the same unit as well? See above for the story of the Flying Camp and the Battles of Long Island and Fort Washington.

From the Pennsylvania Archives is a note from Captain Timothy Jayne, "The following were taken in the Battle of Long Island prisoners, belonging to my company . . . William Hissom, Abner Hissom . . ."

If he survived his capture William would have been confined to the prison ships. Of the 2,200 Pennsylvania Germans captured at Fort Washington, about 1,900 perished within two months, according to the proceedings of the Pennsylvania German Society. There were prisoner exchanges and paroles, but it is probable that William remained on the ships for about 6 months to a year. Abner appears in no further records.

American Prisoners of the Revolution

The British took so many American prisoners at Long Island and on Manhattan that prison space became a premium. Every conceivable building was turned into a prison: three sugar houses, several Dutch churches, the Old City Hall, and Kings College [now Columbia] for a while. These soon became packed, and bad food and infectious disease quickly took their toll.

The British used the ships at Wallabout Bay, later the site of the Brooklyn Navy Yard, for naval prisoners on this side of the Atlantic. The prisoners included men captured on American privateers, merchant ships, French, Spanish, and Dutch vessels, and British Army prisoners of war. After April 1780, the JERSEY was the receiving ship where names were entered into records. At left is the monument at Fort Green Park to the prisoners who suffered at Wallabout Bay. The bones of a number of these prisoners are buried beneath the monument.


The Prison Ships

More Americans died in British prison ships in New York Harbor than in all the battles of the Revolutionary War. There were at least 16 of these floating prisons anchored in Wallabout Bay on the East River for most of the war and they were sinkholes of filth, vermin, infectious disease and despair. It is estimated that half of the inmates, who totaled over 13,000, died during their captivity. The ships were uniformly wretched, but the most notorious was the JERSEY.

Built in 1735 as a 64-gun ship-of-the-line, the JERSEY was converted into a prison ship in the winter of 1779-1780.

The sacrifices and suffering of the survivor's of the Flying Camp were taken into account when the Militia Act of 1777 was put into effect in Northampton County. John Nicholas Kline explained: “The remnant of the Flying Camp Militia was put into class no. 8 with the avowed reason that they, (if called out at all) should be the last, as they had suffered much in the service before."

On 18 July 1786 there was a survey of 400 acres in Northumberland county, Pennsylvania in the name of William Heysham [there are in fact two citations for William, but they are identical]. The Pennsylvania Archives, Third Series, Vol.26 (Northampton County) shows a William Heysham with 400 acres. Date of Survey; Sept. 7, 1789. These were most probably references to land deals made by Captain William Heysham of Philadelphia.

Only Thomas, Thomas Jr., John and David Hysham [Hissom] were listed in the 1790 census of Lower Smithfield.

(21) Elizabeth Heysham (c1756)
(15) Raphe Hesome (c1550) (16) William Hesome (c1577) (17) George Hesom (c1600) (18) John Heesom (c1650) (19) Unknown Heesom (c1687) (20) Thomas Hesom (c1720)

A daughter of Thomas Heysham. Though I have no record of her birth I picked 1756 because there was room in the birth order there for her. She married Daniel Sullivan.

(22) James Heysham Sullivan (1786)

He was born on 20 August 1786, but not baptized until 29 August 1788, the same day as his cousin, Joab. The baptism was performed by the Reverend Elia Van Bunshofen at the Reformed Dutch Church of Smithfield, Pennsylvania. At one time I thought James was illegitimate because he was called James Heysham and his father's name was Sullivan, but after a review of the baptismal records I note that illegitimacy was clearly indicated, where appropriate, and that children were shown only by their given names, so the notation James Heysham only meant that he had two given names, not that his father was a scoundrel.

Witnesses at the baptism were Thomas Heysham and Elizabeth Brink. Note also, the baptism date for Joab Heysham, David Heysham’s first son, was held the same day, though they were born years apart. The delay in James' baptism was in part due to the lack of a minister, there was none in the Minisink between 1770 and 1785. The further delay may have been because of the backlog or, having done without for so many years no one was now in a hurry.

James married Mary Blackburn on 11 November 1836 in Jefferson county, Pennsylvania. Mary was born in 1805, making her 29 years old to his fifty [the dirty old man]. Jefferson county is in northwestern Pennsylvania and was once part of Westmoreland county, gaining its current form in 1830. Punxsutawney Phil, the prognosticating ground hog, makes his home there.


Strays

The following are Heysham-Hissems that cannot be placed and which may be erroneous. That is, they have no real relationship to the family. Some of these are Germans, the name being a variation on Hussong, Hesse and, perhaps, Heismann.

New York Hissam's

(??) Deborah Hesam (c1755-1774)

In the 1800 census of Charlton, Saratoga county, New York as Deborah Hesam. In the household were 2 boys under 10, 1 boy 10 to 16 years old, and a man, 26 to 45 years old. Women in the house included 1 girl under 10, a women 16 to 26, and another 26 to 45. There were also 2 slaves. Normally I would assume the two adults, 26 to 45, were married, but since Deborah was the head of the household, I assume not.

(??) Daniel Hissam

In the 1810 Federal census of Flushing, Queens county, New York as Daniel Hissam. Last name could be Kissam. I suspect this family was Dutch. The household contained 2 boys under 10, 1 aged 16 to 20, and one man 45 or over. Women included two girls 10 to 15, one 16 thru 25, one 26 thru 44. One other was under the title "all other pree persons. Two slaves were listed.

Note that in the 1870 census of Ward 14, District 8, New York City there is a black family of Jacob Hissam, 77, John Hissam, 56, and Fanny Hissam, 3. Suspect these were the slaves and their descendentts of Daniel Hissam.

Benjamin Hissam

In the 1810 Federal census of Flushing, Queens county, New York as Benjamin Hissam. Last name could be Kissam. The household contained two boys 16 thru 25 years old, and one man 45 or older. The women included one girl 10 thru 15, one 26 thru 44 and one 45 or over. Two other free persons were listed.

Hewlitt Hissam

In the 1810 Federal census of Flushing, Queens county, New York as Hewlitt Hissam. Last name bould be Kissam. The household contained one boy 10 thru 15 years old, and a man 45 or over. The women included four girls under 10, 1 10 thru 15, and one 26 thru 44.


The following are from the 1820 Federal census.

William Hissam

Living in Fairfield township, Fairfield county, Connecticut in 1820. The household contained one man and one women, 26 to 45 years old. No children were listed.


The following is from the 1840 census of Ward 13, New York City, New York.

Joseph Hissam

The household included one man 30 to 40 years old and another who was between 60 and 70. I suspect Joseph is the younger man, taking care of his aged father, who could be any one of the New York Hissam's above. There is also a woman in the house, 50 to 60 years old.

Colonel Heson

From the Pennsylvania Archives, 6th S., XIV, 129.

Steve Hissem
San Diego, California